Skip to main content

New Developments in Colonoscopy

  • Chapter
Radiology and Imaging of the Colon

Part of the book series: Medical Radiology ((Med Radiol Diagn Imaging))

  • 249 Accesses

Abstract

Colonoscopy has revolutionised our understanding and management of colorectal disease by providing direct, in vivo, colour images of the mucosal surface. In expert hands the procedure can be performed with little or no sedation and can inspect the entire colorectal mucosa with up to 50 cm of the terminal ileum in 95%–99% of patients. Most importantly it also provides biopsy diagnosis and access for direct therapy, which often precludes the need for surgery. The all-round capability of the procedure makes it the optimal investigation for suspected colonic neoplasia, colonic bleeding, suspected inflammatory mucosal disease and for surveillance of those at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Radiologists should be aware that conventional colonoscopy is constantly developing as a technique. Recent developments have seen better instruments that are easier to pass to the caecum and better visualisation and identification of mucosal abnormalities thus increasing diagnostic accuracy. Colonoscopy provides internal access for therapy and is enabling a new form of minimally invasive surgery with endoscopic resection of very large polyps, early cancers, treatment of colonic stenoses with dilatation and stenting and mucosal ablation to treat bleeding lesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akahoshi K, Yoshinaga S, Soejima A, Nagaie T, Koyanagi N, Nakanishi K, Harada N, Nawata H (2001) Transit endoscopic ultrasound of colorectal cancer using a 12 MHz catheter probe. Br J Radiol 74:1017–1022

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bladen JS, Anderson AP, Bell GD, Heatley DJ (1993a) A non-radiological technique for the real time imaging of endoscopes in 3 dimensions. Conference record of the 1993 IEEE nuclear science symposium and medical imaging conference, 1891–1894

    Google Scholar 

  • Bladen JS, Anderson AP, Bell GD, Heatley DJ (1993b) Non-radiological technique for three-dimensional imaging of endoscopes. Lancet 341:719

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brooker JC, Saunders BP, Shah SG, Williams CB (2000) A new variable stiffness colonoscope makes colonoscopy easier: a randomised controlled trial. Gut 46:801–805

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brooker JC, Saunders BP, Shah SG, Thapar CJ, Thomas HJ, Atkin WS, Cardwell CR, Williams CB (2002) Total colonic dye-spray increases the detection of diminutive adenomas during routine colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 56:333–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eisen GM, Kim CY, Fleischer DE, Kozarek RA, Carr-Locke DL, Li TC, Gostout CJ, Heller SJ, Montgomery EA, Al-Kawas FH, Lewis JH, Benjamin SB (2002) High-resolution chromoen-doscopy for classifying colonic polyps: a multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 55:687–694

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fenlon HM, Nunes DP, Schroy PC 3rd, Barish MA, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT (1999) A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med 341:1496–1503

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fritscher-Ravens A, Swain CP (2002) The wireless capsule: new light in the darkness. Dig Dis 20:127–133 (Gastroenterology 2001,120:1657–1665)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ishiguro A, Uno Y, Ishiguro Y, Munakata A, Morita T (1999) Correlation of lifting versus non-lifting and microscopic depth of invasion in early colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 50:329–333

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jass JR, Whitehall VL, Young J, Leggett BA (2002) Emerging concepts in colorectal neoplasia. Gastroenterology 123: 862–876

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kay CL, Kulling D, Hawes RH, Young JW, Cotton PB (2000) Virtual endoscopy-comparison with colonoscopy in the detection of space-occupying lesions of the colon. Endoscopy 32:226–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kudo S, Kashida H, Tamura T, Kogure E, Imai Y, Yamano H, Hart AR (2000) Colonoscopic diagnosis and management of nonpolypoid early colorectal cancer. World J Surg 24: 1081–1090

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kudo S, Rubio CA, Teixeira CR, Kashida H, Kogure E (2001a) Pit pattern in colorectal neoplasia: endoscopic magnifying view. Endoscopy 33:367–373

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kudo S, Tamegai Y, Yamano H, Imai Y, Kogure E, Kashida H (2001b) Endoscopic mucosal resection of the colon: the Japanese technique. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 11:519–535

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Laghi A, Iannaccone R, Carbone I, Catalano C, Di Giulio E, Schillaci A, Passariello R (2002a) Detection of colorectal lesions with virtual computed tomographic colonography. Am J Surg 183:124–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laghi A, Iannaccone R, Carbone I, Catalano C, Panebianco V, Di Giulio E, Schillaci A, Passariello R (2002b) Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): blinded prospective comparison with conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasia. Endoscopy 34: 441–446

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto T, Hizawa K, Esaki M, Kurahara K, Mizuno M, Hirakawa K, Yao T, Iida M (2002) Comparison of EUS and magnifying colonoscopy for assessment of small colorectal cancers. Gastrointest Endosc 56:354–360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mycek MA, Schomacker KT, Nishioka NS (1998) Colonic polyp differentiation using time-resolved autofluorescence spectroscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 48:390–394

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Odori T, Goto H, Arisawa T, Niwa Y, Ohmiya N, Hayakawa T (2001) Clinical results and development of variable-stiffness video colonoscopes. Endoscopy 33:65–69

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Postic G, Lewin D, Bickerstaff C, Wallace MB (2002) Colonoscopic miss rates determined by direct comparison of colonoscopy with colon resection specimens. Am J Gastroenterol 97:3182–3185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rembacken BJ, Fujii T, Cairns A, Dixon MF, Yoshida S, Chalmers DM, Axon AT (2000) Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK. Lancet 355:1211–1214

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rex DK (2000) Colonoscopic withdrawal technique is associated with adenoma miss rates. Gastrointest Endosc 51:33–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rex DK (2001) Effect of variable stiffness colonoscopes on cecal intubation times for routine colonoscopy by an experienced examiner in sedated patients. Endoscopy 33:60–64

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rex DK (2002) Rationale for colonoscopy screening and estimated effectiveness in clinical practice. Gastrointest Endosc Clin North Am 12:65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT, Rahmani EY, Clark DW, Helper DJ, Lehman GA, Mark DG (1997a) Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 112:24–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rex DK, Rahmani EY, Haseman JH, Lemmel GT, Kaster S, Buckley JS (1997b) Relative sensitivity of colonoscopy and barium enema for detection of colorectal cancer in clinical practice. Gastroenterology 112:17–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rex DK, Vining D, Kopecky KK (1999) An initial experience with screening for colon polyps using spiral CT with and without CT colography (virtual colonoscopy). Gastrointest Endosc 50:309–313

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saitoh Y, Waxman I, West AB, Popnikolov NK, Gatalica Z, Watari J, Obara T, Kohgo Y, Pasricha PJ (2001) Prevalence and distinctive biologic features of flat colorectal adenomas in a North American population. Gastroenterology 120:1657–1665

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders BP, Bell GD, Williams CB, Bladen JS, Anderson AP (1995) First clinical results with a real time, electronic imager as an aid to colonoscopy. Gut 36:913–917

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shah SG, Brooker JC, Williams CB, Thapar C, Saunders BP (2000a) Effect of magnetic endoscope imaging on colonoscopy performance: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 356:1718–1722

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shah SG, Saunders BP, Brooker JC, Williams CB (2000b) Magnetic imaging of colonoscopy: an audit of looping, accuracy and ancillary maneuvers. Gastrointest Endosc 52:1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shah SG, Brooker JC, Thapar C, Williams CB, Saunders BP (2002a) Patient pain during colonoscopy — an analysis using real-time magnetic endoscope imaging. Endoscopy 34:435–440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shah SG, Pearson HJ, Moss S, Kweka E, Jalal PK, Saunders BP (2002b) Magnetic endoscope imaging: a new technique for localizing colonic lesions. Endoscopy 34:900–904

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shah SG, Thomas-Gibson S, Brooker JC, Suzuki N, Williams CB, Thapar C, Saunders BP (2002c) Use of video and magnetic endoscope imaging for rating competence at colonoscopy: validation of a measurement tool. Gastrointest Endosc 56:568–573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shah SG, Brooker JC, Williams CB, Thapar C, Suzuki N, Saunders BP (2002d) The variable stiffness colonoscope: assessment of efficacy by magnetic endoscope imaging. Gastrointest Endosc 56:195–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shah SG, Lockett M, Thomas-Gibson S, Brooker JC, Vance M, Thapar CJ, Saunders BP (2002e) Effect of magnetic endoscope imaging (MEI) on acquisition of colonoscopy skills. Gut 50[Suppl2]:A41

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith GA, O’Dwyer PJ (2001) Sensitivity of double contrast barium enema and colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal neoplasms. Surg Endosc 15:649–652

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tamura S, Ookawauchi K, Onishi S, Yokoyama Y, Yamada T, Higashidani Y, Tadokoro T, Onishi S (2002) The usefulness of magnifying chromoendoscopy: pit pattern diagnosis can predict histopathological diagnosis precisely. Am J Gastroenterol 97:2934–2935

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsuda S, Veress B, Toth E, Fork FT (2002) Flat and depressed colorectal tumours in a southern Swedish population: a prospective chromoendoscopic and histopathological study. Gut 51:550–555

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tung SY, Wu CS, Su MY (2001) Magnifying colonoscopy in differentiating neoplastic from nonneoplastic colorectal lesions. Am J Gastroenterol 96:2628–2632

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang TD, Crawford JM, Feld MS, Wang Y, Itzkan I, van Dam J (1999) In vivo identification of colonic dysplasia using fluorescence endoscopic imaging. Gastrointest Endosc 49: 447–455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams CB, Guy C, Gillies DF, Saunders B (1993) Electronic three-dimensional imaging of intestinal endoscopy. Lancet 341:724

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winawer SJ, Stewart ET, Zauber AG, Bond JH, Ansel H, Waye JD, Hall D, Hamlin JA, Schapiro M, O’Brien MJ, Sternberg SS, Gottlieb LS (2000) A comparison of colonoscopy and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance after polypectomy. National Polyp Study Work Group. N Engl J Med 342:1766–1772

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff WI, Shinya H (1971) Colonofiberoscopy. JAMA 217: 1509–1512

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff WI, Shinya H (1973) Polypectomy via the fiberoptic colonoscope. Removal of neoplasms beyond reach of the sigmoidoscope. N Engl J Med 288:329–332

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida M, Tsukamoto Y, Niwa Y, Goto H, Hase S, Hayakawa T, Okamura S (1995) Endoscopic assessment of invasion of colorectal tumors with a new high-frequency ultrasound probe. Gastrointest Endosc 41:587–592

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Saunders, B.P. (2004). New Developments in Colonoscopy. In: Chapman, A.H. (eds) Radiology and Imaging of the Colon. Medical Radiology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18834-3_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18834-3_28

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-62314-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-18834-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics