Advertisement

Konventionelle Röntgendiagnostik und Schnittbildverfahren

  • A. Thalhammer
  • V. Jacobi
  • T. Vogl
Part of the Onkologie aktuell book series (ONKAKTUELL)

Zusammenfassung

Für die konventionelle Untersuchung des Ösophagus und des Magens stehen neben wasserlöslichen Kontrastmitteln Bariumsuspensionen zur Verfügung. Bei Aspirationsgefahr sollte ein isotones Kontrastmittel verwendet werden.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Cherukuri R, Levine MS, Furth EE, Rubesin SE, Laufer I (2000) Giant hyperplastic polyps in the stomach: radiographic findings in seven patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175/5:1445–1448Google Scholar
  2. Dux M, Grenacher L, Lubienski A, Schipp A, Richter GM, Hansmann J (2000) Carcinoma of the stomach. Role of imaging for primary diagnosis and preoperative tumor staging. Röfo Fortschr Geb Röntgenstr Neue Bildgeb Verfahr 172/8:661–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dux M, Richter GM, Hansmann J, Kuntz C, Kauffmann GW (1999) Helical hydro-CT for diagnosis and staging of gastric carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23/6:913–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hansen CP, Oskarsson K, Mortensen D (2000) Computedtomography for staging of oesophageal cancer. Ann Chir Gynaecol 89/1:14–18Google Scholar
  5. Lee JH, Jeong YK, Kim DH, Go BK, Woo YJ, Ham SY, Yang SO (2000) Twophase helical CT for detection of early gastric carcinoma: importance of the mucosal phase for analysis of the abnormal mucosal layer. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24/5:777–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Markland CG, Manhire A, Davies P, Beggs D, Morgan WE, Salama FD (1989) The role of computed tomography in assessing the operability of oesophageal carcinoma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 3/1:33–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Oberstein A, Bockhorn H, Meves M (1987) The value of computerized and magnetic resonance tomography for staging esophageal and cardiac cancer in comparison with conventional diagnosis. Bildgebung 56/3:91–96Google Scholar
  8. Paramo JC, Gomez G (1999) Dynamic CT in the preoperative evaluation of patients with gastric cancer: correlation with surgical findings and pathology. Ann Surg Oncol 6/4:379–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pokieser P, Memarsadeghi M, Danzer M, Prokesch R, Partik B, Wenzl E (1999) Staging of carcinomas of the upper gastrointestinal tract. The current status of diagnostic imaging. Radiologe 39/7:555–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Rankin SC, Taylor H, Cook GJ, Mason R (1998) Computed tomography and positron emission tomography in the pre-operative staging of oesophageal carcinoma. Clin Radiol 53/9:659–665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ruf G, Brobmann GF, Grosser G, Wimmer B (1985) Value of computer tomography for evaluation of local operability and choice of surgical procedure in esophageal cancer. Langenbecks Arch Chir 365/3: 157–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sohn KM, Lee JM, Lee SY, Ahn BY, Park SM, Kim KM (2000) Comparing MR imaging and CT in the staging of gastric carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174/6:1551–1557Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Thalhammer
    • 1
  • V. Jacobi
    • 1
  • T. Vogl
    • 1
  1. 1.Klinikum der Johann-Wolfgang- Goethe-Universität Zentrum für RadiologieInstitut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie Haus 23AFrankfurtGermany

Personalised recommendations