Advertisement

CT and MRI of Pulmonary Emphysema: Assessment of Lung Structure and Function

  • Alexander A. Bankier
  • Pierre Alain Gevenois
Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) is a radiological modality that provides transverse anatomical images. In these images, the value of each picture element (pixel) corresponds to the X-ray attenuation of a defined volume of tissue (voxel). The X-ray attenuation values for each set of projections (slice) are registered by a computer and organized in the form of a matrix. The number of calculated pixels not only determines the image matrix size, but also impacts on the image resolution, and should therefore be as high as possible. In clinical practice, the matrix size is 512×512 pixels. The X-ray attenuation, that is sometimes termed “tissue density”, is numerically expressed in Hounsfield units (HU). The scale of attenuation values ranges from -1000 HU, corresponding to the attenuation value of air, to 3000 HU, with 0 HU corresponding to the attenuation value of water. The thousands of pixels and respective attenuation values included in one scan make CT the most precise modality for the in vivo assessment of pulmonary parenchyma (Hoffman and McLennan 1997).

Keywords

Quantitative Compute Tomography Total Lung Capacity Pulmonary Emphysema Lung Volume Reduction Surgery Compute Tomography Section 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altes TA, Powers PL, Knight-Scott J et al. (2001) Hyperpolarized 3He MR lung ventilation imaging in asthmatics: preliminary findings. J Magn Reson Imaging 13:378–384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angus GE, Thurlbeck WM (1972) Number of alveoli in the human lung. J Appl Physiol 32:483–485PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bae KT, Slone RM, Gierada DS, Yusen RD, Cooper JD (1997) Patients with emphysema: quantitative CT analysis before and after lung volume reduction surgery. Radiology 203: 705–714PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bankier AA, Maertelaer V de, Keyzer C, Gevenois PA (1999) CT of pulmonary emphysema: subjective assessment and objective quantification by densitometry and macroscopic morphometry. Radiology 211:851–858PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bergin CJ, Muller NL, Miller RR (1986a) CT in the quantitative assessment of emphysema. J Thorac Imaging 1:94–103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergin C, Müller N, Nichols DM et al. (1986b) The diagnosis of emphysema: a computed tomographic-pathologic correlation. Am Rev Respir Dis 133:541–546PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Black RD, Middleton HL, Cates GD et al. (1996) In vivo He-3 MR images of guinea pig lungs. Radiology 199:867–870PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Boren HG (1962) Alveolar fenestrae: relationship to the pathology and pathogenesis of pulmonary emphysema. Am Rev Respir Dis 85:328–344PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen Q, Levin DL, Kim D et al. (1999) Pulmonary disorders: ventilation-perfusion MR imaging with animal models. Radiology 213:871–879PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen XJ, Hedlund LW, Moller HE, Chawla MS, Maronpot RR, Johnson GA (2000) Detection of emphysema in rat lungs by using magnetic resonance measurements of 3He diffusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:11478–11481PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cluzel P, Similowski T, Chartrand-Lefebvre C, Zelter M, Derenne JP, Grenier PA (2000) Diaphragm and chest wall: assessment of the inspiratory pump with MR imaging-preliminary observations. Radiology 215:574–583PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cooper JD, Lefrak SS (1996) Is volume reduction surgery appropriate in the treatment of emphysema? Yes. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 153:1201–1204Google Scholar
  13. Cosio MG, Shiner RJ, Saetta M, Wang N, King M, Ghezzo H, Angus E (1986) Alveolar fenestrae in smokers. Relationships with light microscopic and functional abnormalities. Am Rev Respir Dis 133:126–131PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Coxson HO, Rogers RM, Whittall KP, D’Yachkova Y, Paré PD, Sciurba FC, Hogg JC (1999) A quantification of the lung surface area in emphysema using computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 159:851–856PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. De Lange EE, Mugler JP III, Brookeman JP et al. (1999) Lung air spaces: MR imaging evaluation with hyperpolarized 3He gas. Radiology 210:851–857Google Scholar
  16. Dirksen A, Dijkman JH, Madsen F et al. (1999) A randomized clinical trial of a1-antitrypsin augmented therapy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 160:1468–1472PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Dunnill MS (1962a) Postnatal growth of the lung. Thorax 17: 329–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dunnill MS (1962b) Quantitative methods in the study of pulmonary pathology. Thorax 17:320–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dunnill MS (1964) Evaluation of a simple method of sampling the lung for quantitative histological analysis. Thorax 19: 443–448PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eda S, Kubo K, Fujimoto K, Matsuzawa Y, Sekiuchi M, Sakai F (1997) The relations between expiratory chest CT using helical scanning and pulmonary function tests in emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 155:1290–1294PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Edelman RR, Hatabu H, Tadamura E, Li W, Prasad PV (1996) Noninvasive assessment of regional ventilation in the human lung using oxygen-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Nat Med 2:1236–1239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Geddes D, Davies M, Koyama H, Hansell D, Pastorino U, Pepper J, Agent P, Cullinan P, McNeill SJ, Glodstraw P (2000) Effect of lung-volume reduction surgery in patients with severe emphysema. N Engl J Med 343:239–245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gelb AF, Hogg JC, Müller NL et al. (1996) Contribution of emphysema and small airways in COPD. Chest 109:353–359PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gelb AF, Brenner M, Mc Kenna RJ Jr, Fischel R, Zamel N, Schein MJ (1998) Serial lung function and elastic recoil 2 years after lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema. Chest 113:1497–1506PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gevenois PA, Yernault JC (1995) Can computed tomography quantify pulmonary emphysema? Eur Respir J 5:843–848Google Scholar
  26. Gevenois PA, Zanen J, Maertelaer V de, Vuyst P de, Dumortier P, Yernault JC (1995a) Macroscopic assessment of pulmonary emphysema by image analysis. J Clin Pathol 48: 318–322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gevenois PA, Maertelaer V de, Vuyst P de, Zanen J, Yernault JC (1995b) Comparison of computed density and macroscopic morphometry in pulmonary emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 152:653–657PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Gevenois PA, Vuyst P de, Maertelaer V de, Zanen J, Jacobovitz D, Cosio MG, Yernault J-C (1996a) Comparison of computed density and microscopic morphometry in pulmonary emphysema. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 154:187–192PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Gevenois PA, Vuyst P de, Sy M, Scillia P, Chaminade L, Maertelaer V de, Zanen J, Yernault J-C (1996b) Pulmonary emphysema: quantitative CT during expiration. Radiology 199:825–829PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Gierada DS, Slone RM, Bae KT, Yusen RD, Lefrak SS, Cooper JD (1997) Pulmonary emphysema: comparison of preoperative quantitative CT and physiologic index values with clinical outcome after lung volume reduction surgery. Radiology 205:235–242PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Gierada DS, Saam B, Yablonskiy D, Cooper JD, Lefrak SS, Conradi MS (2000) Dynamic echo planar MR imaging of lung ventilation with hyperpolarized (3)He in normal subjects and patients with severe emphysema. NMR Biomed 13:176–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gillooly M, Lamb D (1993a) Airspace size in lungs of lifelong non-smokers: effect of age and sex. Thorax 48:39–43PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gillooly M, Lamb D (1993b) Microscopic emphysema in relation to age and smoking habit. Thorax 48:491–495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gould GA, Macnee W, McLean A, Warren M, Redpath A, Best JJK, Lamb D, Flenley DC (1988) CT measurements of lung density in life can quantitate distal airspace enlargement: an essential defining feature of human emphysema. Am Rev Respir Dis 137:380–392PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Gurney JW (1998) Pathophysiology of obstructive airways disease. Radiol Clin North Am 36:15–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gurney JW, Jones KK, Robbins RA, Gossman GL, Nelson KJ, Daughton D, Spurzem JR, Rennard SI (1992) Regional distribution of emphysema: correlation of high-resolution CT with pulmonary function tests in unselected smokers. Radiology 183:457–463PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Haragushi M, Shimura S, Hida W, Shirato K (1998) Pulmonary function and regional distribution of emphysema as determined by high-resolution computed tomography. Respiration 65:125–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hartley PG, Galvin JR, Hunninghake GW, Merchant JA, Yagla SJ, Speakman SB, Schwartz DA (1994) High-resolution CT-derived measures of lung density are valid indexes of interstitial lung diseases. J Appl Physiol 76:271–277PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Hayhurst MD, Flenley DC, McLean A, Wightman AJA, MacNee W, Wright D, Lamb D, Best J (1984) Diagnosis of pulmonary emphysema by computerised tomography. Lancet 2: 320–322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hoffman EA, Mc Lennan G (1997) Assessment of the pulmonary structure-function relationship and clinical outcomes measures. Acad Radiol 4:758–776PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hruban RH, Meziane MA, Zerhouni EA, Khouri NF, Fishman EK, Wheeler PS, Dumler JS, Hutchins GM (1987) High resolution computed tomography of inflation-fixed lungs: pathologic-radiologic correlation of centrolobular emphysema. Am Rev Respir Dis 136:935–940PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kalender WA, Fitche H, Bautz W, Skalej M (1991) Semiautomatic evaluation procedure for quantitative CT of the lung. J Comput Assist Tomogr 15:248–255PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kauczor HU, Kreitner KF (1999) MRI of the pulmonary parenchyma. Eur Radiol 9:1755–1764PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kauczor HU, Ebert M, Kreitner KF et al. (1997) Imaging of the lungs using 3He MRI: preliminary clinical experience in 18 patients with and without lung disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 7:538–543PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kauczor HU, Heussel CP, Fisher B, Klamm R, Mildenberger P, Thelen M (1998) Assessment of lung volumes using helical CT at inspiration and expiration: comparison with pulmonary function tests. AJR Am J Roentgenol 171:1091–1095PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Kauczor HU, Heussel CP, Thelen M (1999) Update on diagnostic strategies of pulmonary embolism. Eur Radiol 9: 262–275PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kauczor HU, Chen XJ, Beek EJ van, Schreiber WG (2001) Pulmonary ventilation imaged by magnetic resonance: at the doorstep of clinical application. Eur Respir J 17:1008–1023PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kauczor HU, Hanke A, Beek EJ van (2002) Assessment of lung ventilation by MR imaging: current status and future perspectives. Eur Radiol 12:1962–1970PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Kazerooni EA (1999) Radiologic evaluation of emphysema for lung volume reduction surgery. Clin Chest Med 20:45–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kinsella M, Müller NL, Abboud RT, Morrison NJ, DyBuncio A (1990) Quantitation of emphysema by computed tomography using a “Density Mask” program and correlation with pulmonary function tests. Chest 97:315–321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Knudson RJ, Standen JR, Kaltenborn WT, Knudson DE, Rehm K, Habib MP, Newell JD (1991) Expiratory computed tomography for assessment of suspected pulmonary emphysema. Chest 99:1357–1366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Kohz P, Stäbler A, Beinert T, Behr J, Egge T, Heuck A, Reiser MF (1995) Reproductibility of quantitative, spirometrically controlled CT. Radiology 197:539–542PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Kuwano K, Matsuba K, Ikeda T, Murakami J, Araki A, Nishitani H, Teruyoshi I, Yasumoto K, Shigematsu N (1990) The diagnosis of mild emphysema: correlation of computed tomography and pathology scores. Am Rev Respir Dis 141:169–178PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Lamers RJ, Thelissen GR, Kessels AG, Wouters EF, Engelshoven JM (1994) Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: evaluation with spirometrically controlled CT lung densitometry. Radiology 193:109–113PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Mai VM, Chen Q, Bankier AA, Edelman RR (2000) Multiple inversion recovery MR subtraction imaging of human ventilation from inhalation of room air and pure oxygen. Magn Reson Med 43:913–916PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. McLean A, Warren PM, Gillooly M, MacNee W (1992) Microscopic and macroscopic measurements of emphysema: relation to carbon monoxide gas transfer. Thorax 47: 144–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. McNamee JE (1991) Fractal perspectives in pulmonary physiology. J Appl Physiol 71:1–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Miller RR, Muller NL, Vedal S, Morrison NJ, Stapels CA (1989) Limitations of computed tomography in the assessment of emphysema. Am Rev Respir Dis 139:980–983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Mishima M, Hirai T, Itoh H et al. (1999a) Complexity of terminal airspace geometry assessed by lung computed tomography in normal subjects and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 8829–8834PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mishima M, Itoh H, Sakai H et al. (1999b) Optimized scanning conditions of high resolution CT in the follow-up of pulmonary emphysema. J Comput Assist Tomogr 23:380–384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Morgan MDL (1992) Detection and quantification of pulmonary emphysema by computed tomography: a window of opportunity. Thorax 47:1001–1004PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Morrison NJ, Abboud RT, Ramadan F, Miller RR, Gibson NN, Evans KG, Nelems B, Müller NL (1989) Comparison of single breath carbon monoxide diffusing capacity and pressure-volume curves in detecting emphysema. Am Rev Respir Dis 139:1179–1187PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Müller NL, Thurlbeck WM (1996) Thin-section CT, emphysema, air-trapping, and airway obstruction. Radiology 199: 621–622PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Müller NL, Stapels CA, Miller RR, Abboud RJ (1988) “Density Mask”: an objective method to quantitate emphysema using computed tomography. Chest 94:782–787PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nagai A, Inano H, Matsuba K, Thurlbeck WM (1994) Scanning electron microscopy morphometry of emphysema in humans. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 150:1411–1415PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Nakano Y, Sakai H, Hirai T, Oku Y, Nishimura K, Mishima M (1999) Comparison of low attenuation areas on computed tomographic scans between inner and outer segments of the lung in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: incidence and contribution to lung function. Thorax 54:384–389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Nishimura K, Murata K, Yamagishi M et al. (1998) Comparison of different computed tomography scanning methods for quantifying emphysema. J Thorac Imaging 13:193–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Park KJ, Bergin CJ, Clausen JL (1999) Quantification of emphysema with three-dimensional CT densitometry: comparison with two-dimensional analysis, visual emphysema scores, and pulmonary function test results. Radiology 211:541–547PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Rienmüller RK, Behr J, Kalender A, Schätzl M, Altmann I, Merin M, Beinert T (1991) Standardized quantitative high resolution CT in lung diseases. J Comput Assist Tomogr 15:742–749PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rodarte JR, Chaniotakis M, Wilson TA (1989) Variability of parenchymal expansion measured by computed tomography. J Appl Physiol 67:226–231PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Russi EW, Bloch KE, Weder W (1999) Functional and morphological heterogeneity of emphysema and its implication for selection of patients for lung volume reduction surgery. Eur Respir J 14:230–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Saetta M, Shiner RJ, Angus GE, Kim WD, Wang NS, King M, Ghezzo H, Cosio MG (1985) Destructive index: a measurement of lung parenchyma destruction in smokers. Am Rev Respir Dis 131:764–769PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Saitoh T, Koba H, Shijubo N, Tanaka H, Sugaya F (2000) Lobar distribution of emphysema in computed tomographic densitometric analysis. Invest Radiol 35:235–243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Salerno M, Lange EE de, Altes TA, Truwit JD, Brookeman JR, Mugler JP III (2002) Emphysema: hyperpolarized helium 3 diffusion MR imaging of the lungs compared with Spirometric indexes-initial experience. Radiology 222: 252–260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sanders C, Nath PH, Bailey WC (1988) Detection of emphysema with computed tomography: correlation with pulmonary function tests and chest radiography. Invest Radiol 23:262–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Snider GL, Kleinerman JL, Thurlbeck WM, Bengali ZH (1985) The definition of emphysema. Report of a national Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Division of Lung Disease Workshop. Am Rev Respir Dis 132:182–185Google Scholar
  77. Soeijima K, Yamaguchi K, Kohda E et al. (2000) Longitudinal follow-up study of smoking-induced lung density changes by high resolution computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 161:1264–1273Google Scholar
  78. Stern EJ, Franck MS (1994) CT of the lung in patients with pulmonary emphysema: diagnosis, quantification, and correlation with pathologic and physiologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162:791–798PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Stockley RA (2000) Alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency: what next? Thorax 55:614–618PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Stoel BC, Vrooman HA, Stolk J, Reiber JHC (1999) Sources of error in lung densitometry with CT. Invest Radiol 34:303–309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Suga K, Tsukuda T, Awaya H et al. (1999) Impaired respiratory mechanics in pulmonary emphysema: evaluation with dynamic breathing MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 10:510–520PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Tepper J, Pfeiffer J, Aldrich M, Tumas D, Kern J, Hoffman E, McLennan G, Hyde D (2000) Can retinoic acid ameliorate the physiologic and morphologic effects of elastase instillation in the rat? Chest 117:242S–244SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Thurlbeck WM (1967a) The internal surface area of nonemphysematous lungs. Am Rev Respir Dis 95:765–773PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Thurlbeck WM (1967b) Internal surface area and other measurements in emphysema. Thorax 22:483–496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Thurlbeck WM, Müller NL (1994) Emphysema: definition, imaging, and quantification. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163: 1017–1025PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Thurlbeck WM, Dunnill MS, Hartung W, Heard BE, Heppleston AG, Ryder RC (1970) A comparison of three methods measuring emphysema. Hum Pathol 1:215–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Turner P, Whimster WF (1981) Volume of emphysema. Thorax 36:932–937PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Uppaluri R, Mitsa T, Sonka M, Hoffman EA, McLennan G (1997) Quantification of pulmonary emphysema from lung computed tomography images. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 156:248–254PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Viallon M, Berthezene Y, Decorps M et al. (2000) Laser-polarized 3He as a probe for dynamic regional measurements of lung perfusion and ventilation using magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 44:1–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Watanuki Y, Shunsuke S, Nishikawa M, Miyashita A, Okubo T (1994) Correlation of quantitative CT with selective alveolobronchogram and pulmonary function tests in emphysema. Chest 106:806–813PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Weder W, Thurnheer R, Stammberger U, Bürge M, Russi EW, Bloch KE (1997) Radiological emphysema morphology is associated with outcome after surgical lung volume reduction. Ann Thorac Surg 64:313–320PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Weibel ER (1963) Morphometry of the human lung. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alexander A. Bankier
    • 1
  • Pierre Alain Gevenois
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria
  2. 2.Université Libre des Bruxelles - Hopital ErasmeBruxellesBelgium

Personalised recommendations