Skip to main content
  • 378 Accesses

Abstract

Chromium is so called because of the brightness of many of its salts, hence the use of the Greek word for colour. Chromium can occur in every one of the oxidation states from −2 to +6, but the ground states 0, +2, +3, and +6 are common (Love 1983). Chromium metal itself does not act as an allergen and must do so in combination with a protein. Only the trivalent and hexavalent salts are able to act as haptens; that is, they form potentially antigenic bonds with proteins. The metal is highly resistant to corrosion in the atmosphere and many aqueous solutions and is an unlikely cause of contact allergy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bidstrup PL (1983) Effects of chrome compounds on the respiratory system. In: Burrows D (ed) Chromium: metabolism and toxicity. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 31–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrows D (1972) Prognosis in industrial dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 87:145–148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burrows D (1987) Comparison of 0.25 and 0.5% potassium dichromate in patch testing. Bull Dermatol Allerg Profess 2:117–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrows D, Calnan CD (1965) Cement dermatitis. Trans St Johns Hosp Dermatol Soc 51:27–39

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burrows D, Cooke MD (1980) Trivalent chrome plating. Contact Dermatitis 6:222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burrows D, Andersen KE, Camaras JG, et al (1989) Trial of 0.5% versus 0.375% potassium dichromate. Contact Dermatitis 21:351

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Decaestecker AM, Marez T, Jdaini J, et al (1990) Hypersensitivity to dichromate among asymptomatic workers in a chromate pigment factory. Contact Dermatitis 23:52–53

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dornan JD (1981) Occupational dermatoses amongst chrome platers in the Sheffield area 1977-80. Contact Dermatitis 7:354–355

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer T, Rystedt I (1985) False positive follicular and irritant patch test reactions to metal salts. Contact Dermatitis 12:93–98

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goh CL, Wong PH, Kwok SF, et al (1986) Chromate allergy: total chromium and hexavalent chromium in the air. Derm Beruf Umwelt 34:132–134

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halbert AR, Gebaver KA, Wall LM (1992) Prognosis of occupational chromate dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 27:214–219

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan DJ, Dannaker W, Lai S, et al (1990) An international survey of the prognosis of occupational contact dermatitis of the hands. Derm Beruf Umwelt 38:143–147

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Langard S (1983) The carcinogenicity of chrome compounds in man and animals. In: Burrows D (ed) Chromium: metabolism and toxicity. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 13–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Love G (1983) Chromium — biological and analytical considerations. In: Burrows D (ed) Chromium: metabolism and toxicity. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Nethercott JR (1982) Results of routine patch testing of 200 patients in Toronto, Canada. Contact Dermatitis 8:389–395

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Niklasson B, Bjorkner B, et al (1996) In vive evaluation of an active barrier cream in nickel contact allergy. Jadassohn Centenary Congress, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltonen L, Fraki J (1983) Prevalence of dichromate sensitivity. Contact Dermatitis 9:190–194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Romaguera C, Grimalt F, Vilaplana J, Carreras E (1985) Formulation of a barrier cream against chromate. Contact Dermatitis 13:49–52

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder CA, Udasin I, Waterman SJ, Taioli E, Gochfield M (1996) Reduced IL-6 levels among individuals in Hudson County, New Jersey, an area contaminated with chromium. Arch Environ Health 51:26–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Valsecchi R, Cainella T (1984) Chromium dermatitis and ascorbic acid. Contact Dermatitis 10:252–253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wall LM (1982) Chromate dermatitis and sodium dithionate. Contact Dermatitis 8:291–293

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams N (1996) A survey of respiratory and dermatological diseases in the chrome plating industry in West Midlands, UK. Occup Med 46:432–434

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Burrows, D. (2004). Chromium. In: Kanerva, L., Elsner, P., Wahlberg, J.E., Maibach, H.I. (eds) Condensed Handbook of Occupational Dermatology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18556-4_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18556-4_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-44348-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-18556-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics