Advertisement

Neutrino Physics From Cosmological Observations

  • Steen Hannestad
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Physics book series (SPPHY, volume 92)

Abstract

Cosmological observations have in the past few years become an increasingly powerful method for determining parameters within the neutrino sector, such as the presence of sterile states and the mass of neutrinos. I review the current status of the field in light of recent measurements of the cosmic microwave background by the WMAP collaboration, as well as current large scale galaxy surveys.

Keywords

Neutrino Mass Cosmological Parameter Neutrino Physics Neutrinoless Double Beta Decay Cosmological Observation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    S. Hannestad and J. Madsen, Phys. Rev. D 52, 1764 (1995) [arXiv:astroph/9506015]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. D. Dolgov, S. H. Hansen and D. V. Semikoz, Nucl. Phys. B 503, 426 (1997) [arXiv:hep-ph/9703315]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    G. Mangano, G. Miele, S. Pastor and M. Peloso, arXiv:astro-ph/0111408Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. Fukuda et al. [Super-Kamiokande Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3999 (2000) [arXiv:hep-ex/0009001]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    N. Fornengo, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia and J. W. Valle, Nucl. Phys. B 580 (2000) 58[arXiv:hep-ph/0002147]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz, M. A. Tortola and J. W. Valle, arXiv:hep-ph/0207227Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    See the SNO homepage http://sno.phy.queensu.caGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. N. Bahcall, M. C. Gonzalez-Garcia and C. Pena-Garay, arXiv:hep-ph/0204314Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    K. Eguchi et al. [KamLAND Collaboration], Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 021802 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ex/0212021]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    V. A. Kostelecky and S. Samuel, Phys. Lett. B 318, 127 (1993)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. M. Fuller, J. R. Primack and Y. Z. Qian, Phys. Rev. D 52, 1288 (1995) [arXiv:astro-ph/9502081]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    D. O. Caldwell and R. N. Mohapatra, Phys. Lett. B 354, 371 (1995) [arXiv:hepph/9503316]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    S. M. Bilenky, C. Giunti, C. W. Kim and S. T. Petcov, Phys. Rev. D 54, 4432 (1996) [arXiv:hep-ph/9604364]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    S. F. King and N. N. Singh, Nucl. Phys. B 596, 81 (2001) [arXiv:hep-ph/0007243]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    H. J. He, D. A. Dicus and J. N. Ng, arXiv:hep-ph/0203237Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    A. Ioannisian and J. W. Valle, Phys. Lett. B 332, 93 (1994) [arXiv:hep-ph/9402333]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    P. Bamert and C. P. Burgess, Phys. Lett. B 329, 289 (1994) [arXiv:hepph/9402229]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. N. Mohapatra and S. Nussinov, Phys. Lett. B 346, 75 (1995) [arXiv:hepph/9411274]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    H. Minakata and O. Yasuda, Phys. Rev. D 56, 1692 (1997) [arXiv:hep-ph/9609276]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    F. Vissani, arXiv:hep-ph/9708483.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    H. Minakata and O. Yasuda, Nucl. Phys. B 523, 597 (1998) [arXiv:hep-ph/9712291]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    J. R. Ellis and S. Lola, Phys. Lett. B 458, 310 (1999) [arXiv:hep-ph/9904279]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. A. Casas, J. R. Espinosa, A. Ibarra and I. Navarro, Nucl. Phys. B 556, 3 (1999) [arXiv:hep-ph/9904395]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    J. A. Casas, J. R. Espinosa, A. Ibarra and I. Navarro, Nucl. Phys. B 569, 82 (2000) [arXiv:hep-ph/9905381]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    E. Ma, J. Phys. G 25, L97 (1999) [arXiv:hep-ph/9907400]Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    R. Adhikari, E. Ma and G. Rajasekaran, Phys. Lett. B 486, 134 (2000) [arXiv:hepph/0004197]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    J. Bonn et al., Nucl. Phys. Proc. Suppl. 91, 273 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    W. Hu, D. J. Eisenstein and M. Tegmark, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5255 (1998) [arXiv:astro-ph/9712057]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    R. A. Croft, W. Hu and R. Dave, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1092 (1999) [arXiv:astroph/9903335]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    M. Fukugita, G. C. Liu and N. Sugiyama, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1082 (2000) [arXiv:hep-ph/9908450]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ø. Elgarøy et al., arXiv:astro-ph/0204152Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    S. Hannestad, arXiv:astro-ph/0205223Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    A. Lewis and S. Bridle, arXiv:astro-ph/0205436Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    D. N. Spergel et al., astro-ph/0302209Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    G. Steigman, D. N. Schramm and J. E. Gunn, Phys. Lett. B 66, 202 (1977)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    U. Seljak and M. Zaldarriaga, Astrophys. J. 469, 437 (1996)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    J. Peacock et al., Nature 410, 169 (2001)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    M. Tegmark, A. J. S. Hamilton and Y. Xu, arXiv:astro-ph/0111575Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    S. Hannestad, arXiv:astro-ph/0211106Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    C. L. Bennett et al., astro-ph/0302207Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    A. Kogut et al., astro-ph/0302213Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    G. Hinshaw et al., astro-ph/0302217Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    L. Verde, et al., astro-ph/0302218Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    X. Wang, M. Tegmark, B. Jain and M. Zaldarriaga, arXiv:astro-ph/0212417Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    S. Hannestad, JCAP 0305, 004 (2003) [arXiv:astro-ph/0303076]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ø. Elgarøy and O. Lahav, astro-ph/0303089.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    A. Pierce and H. Murayama, arXiv:hep-ph/0302131Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    C. Giunti, arXiv:hep-ph/0302173Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    E. Pierpaoli, arXiv:astro-ph/0302465Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    P. Crotty, J. Lesgourgues and S. Pastor, arXiv:astro-ph/0302337Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    S. Hannestad, Phys. Rev. D 64, 083002 (2001) [arXiv:astro-ph/0105220]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    K. N. Abazajian, arXiv:astro-ph/0205238Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    D. Kirkman et al., astro-ph/0302006Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    K. A. Olive, G. Steigman and T. P. Walker, Phys. Rept. 333, 389 (2000) [arXiv:astro-ph/9905320]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    G. F. Giudice, E. W. Kolb and A. Riotto, Phys. Rev. D 64, 023508 (2001) [arXiv:hep-ph/0005123]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri and N. Sugiyama, Phys. Rev. D 62, 023506 (2000) [arXiv:astro-ph/0002127]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    V. Barger, J. P. Kneller, H. S. Lee, D. Marfatia and G. Steigman, Phys. Lett. B 566, 8 (2003) [arXiv:hep-ph/0305075]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    R. H. Cyburt, B. D. Fields and K. A. Olive, arXiv:astro-ph/0302431Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz, M. A. Tortola and J. W. Valle, Nucl. Phys. B 643, 321 (2002) [arXiv:hep-ph/0207157]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    S. Hannestad, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4203 (2000) [arXiv:astro-ph/0005018]ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steen Hannestad
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdense MDenmark

Personalised recommendations