Advertisement

A Value and Model Driven Method for Patient Oriented KPI Design in Health Care

  • Erik Perjons
  • Paul Johannesson
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 127)

Abstract

In all societies, large resources are spent on health care. However, service quality is still unsatisfactory in large parts of the health care sector. One reason for this state of affairs is the complexity of health care organisations, which make them difficult to govern. Furthermore, due to the high degree of specialisation, health care organisations often need to cooperate, which adds to the complexity. One possible way to improve the cooperation and management of health care organisations is the use of performance management, which is a management approach aiming at optimising the performance of an organisation. The main instrument in performance management is the use of Key Performance Indicators (KPI), which measure how well an organisation fulfills its goals. Designing effective KPIs is a complex and time consuming task that requires substantial efforts. Therefore, there is a need for methods that support organisations in designing KPIs. This paper proposes a value and model driven method for identifying patient oriented KPIs.

Keywords

Performance management KPI Enterprise modelling Service quality SERVQUAL 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Walburg, J.: The outcome quadrant. In: Walburg, J., Bevan, H., Wilderspin, J., Lemmens, K. (eds.) Performance Management in Health Care. Improving patient outcomes: an integrated approach. Routledge, UK (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eckerson, W.: Performance Dashboards. In: Measuring, Monitoring and Managing Your Business, John Wiley, Chichester (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jun, M., Peterson, R.T., Zsidisin, G.A.: The identification and Measurment of Quality Dimension in Health Care: Focus Group Interview Results. Health Care Management Review 23(4), 81–96 (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Adair, C.E., Simpson, L., Birdsell, J.M., Omelchuck, K., Casebeer, A.L., Gardiner, H.P., Newman, S., Beckie, A., Clelland, S., Hayden, K.A., Beausejour, P.: Performance Measurement Systems in Health and Mental Health Servicws: Models, Practices and Effectiveness. A State of the Science Review. The Alberta Heritage Founddation for Medical Research (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Grönroos, C.: A Service Quality Model and Its Marketing Implication. European 18(4), 36–44 (1984)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L.: SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perception of service quality. Journal of Retailing 64(1), 12–40 (1988)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L.: A conceptual model of service quality and its implication for future research. Journal of Marketing 49(4), 41–50 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gupta, H.D.: Identifying Health Care Quality Constituents: Service Providers’ Perspective. Journal of Management Research 8(1) (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kilbourne, W.E., Duffy, J.A., Duffy, M., Giarchi, G.: SERVQUAL in cross-national measurements of health care quality. Journal of Service Markeing 18(7), 524–533 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Karassavidou, E., Glaveli, N., Papadoupoulos, C.T.: Quality in NHS hospitals: no one knows better than patients. Measuring Business Excellence 12(1), 34–46 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gill, L., White, L.: A critical review of patient satisfaction. Leadership in Health Services, vol. 22(1), pp. 8–19. Emerald Group Publishing (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kartseva, V., Hulstijn, J., Gordijn, J., Tan, Y.-H.: Control Patterns in a Healthcare Network. In: Brnong, A., and Janssen, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 8th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (DGO 2007), Digital Government Research Center, pp. 66–75 (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Johannesson, P., Perjons, E.: Managing Complexity through Value Modeling. Healthcare IT Management 4(2) (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    CONTSYS, EN-13940-1:2007, Health Informatics – Systems of concepts to support continuity of care. Part 1: Basic Concepts (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    UN/CEFACT Modeling Methodology User Guide, http://www.unece.org/cefact/
  16. 16.
    Henkel, M., Johannesson, P., Perjons, E., Zdravkovic, J.: Value and Goal Driven Design of E-Services. In: The IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering (ICEBE 2007), Hong Kong, China, October 24-26, pp. 295–303 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erik Perjons
    • 1
  • Paul Johannesson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer and Systems SciencesStockholm UniversityKistaSweden

Personalised recommendations