Advertisement

Technical Aspects

  • Alexis JacquierEmail author
Chapter
  • 532 Downloads

Abstract

Each cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) sequence must be adapted to the patient in terms of heart rate and duration of apnea. Cardiac gating is a prerequisite in a CMR study. Electrocardiogram leads have to be MR compatible and positioned to provide a clear, strong electrocardiogram signal. Peripheral vein access must be available to inject contrast medium during the scan session. Different CMR techniques at 1.5T, proposed for the evaluation of a cardiac mass, are described further on [1–6].

Keywords

Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Coronary Anatomy Detector Collimation Phase Sensitive Inversion Recovery Cine Sequence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Mollet NR, Dymarkowski S, Volders W et al (2002) Visualization of ventricular thrombi with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with ischemic heart disease. Circulation 106:2873–2876PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barkhausen J, Hunold P, Eggebrecht H et al (2002) Detection and characterization of intracardiac thrombi on MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:1539–1544PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Paydarfar D, Krieger D, Dib N et al (2001) In vivo magnetic resonance imaging and surgical histopathology of intracardiac masses: distinct features of subacute thrombi. Cardiology 95:40–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brown LR, Aughenbaugh GL (1991) Masses of the anterior mediastinum: CT and MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 157:1171–1180PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Libicher M, Kauffmann GW, Hosch W (2006) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for evaluation of cardiac tumors. Eur Radiol 16:1858–1859PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lund JT, Ehman RL, Julsrud PR, Sinak LJ, Tajik AJ (1989) Cardiac masses: assessment by MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 152:469–473PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pennell DJ, Sechtem UP, Higgins CB et al (2004) Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): consensus panel report. Eur Heart J 25:1940–1965PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saeed M, Saloner D, Martin A et al (2007) Adeno-associated viral vector-encoding vascular endothelial growth factor gene: effect on cardiovascular MR perfusion and infarct resorption measurements in swine. Radiology 243:451–460PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Simonetti OP, Kim RJ, Fieno DS et al (2001) An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction. Radiology 218:215–223PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hedstrom E, Arheden H, Eriksson R, Johansson L, Ahlstrom H, Bjerner T (2006) Importance of perfusion in myocardial viability studies using delayed contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 24:77–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Flacke SJ, Fischer SE, Lorenz CH (2001) Measurement of the gadopentetate dimeglumine partition coefficient in human myocardium in vivo: normal distribution and elevation in acute and chronic infarction. Radiology 218:703–710PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Messroghli DR, Greiser A, Frohlich M, Dietz R, Schulz-Menger J (2007) Optimization and validation of a fully-integrated pulse sequence for modified look-locker inversion-recovery (MOLLI) T1 mapping of the heart. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:1081–1086PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim RJ, Fieno DS, Parrish TB et al (1999) Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function. Circulation 100:1992–2002PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Saeed M, Lee RJ, Weber O et al (2005) Scarred myocardium imposes additional burden on remote viable myocardium despite a reduction in the extent of area with late contrast MR enhancement. Eur Radiol 16:1–10Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jacquier A, Boussel L, Amabile N et al (2008) Multidetector computed tomography in reperfused acute myocardial infarction. Assessment of infarct size and no-reflow in comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol 43:773–781PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Croisille P, Viallon M, Jacquier A et al (2004) Comparison of new late enhancement MR imaging techniques for myocardial infarction lesion assessment at 1.5 T. In: ISMRM. TokyoGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Huber AM, Schoenberg SO, Hayes C et al (2005) Phase-sensitive inversion-recovery MR imaging in the detection of myocardial infarction. Radiology 237:854–860PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jacquier A, Revel D, Saeed M (2008) MDCT of the myocardium a new contribution to ischemic heart disease. Acad Radiol 15:477–487PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mahnken AH, Bruners P, Katoh M, Wildberger JE, Gunther RW, Buecker A (2006) Dynamic multi-section CT imaging in acute myocardial infarction: preliminary animal experience. Eur Radiol 16:746–752PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lardo AC, Cordeiro MA, Silva C et al (2006) Contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography viability imaging after myocardial infarction: characterization of myocyte death, microvascular obstruction, and chronic scar. Circulation 113:394–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gerber BL, Belge B, Legros GJ et al (2006) Characterization of acute and chronic myocardial infarcts by multidetector computed tomography: comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance. Circulation 113:823–833PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Baks T, Cademartiri F, Moelker AD et al (2006) Multislice computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of reperfused acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:144–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brodoefel H, Reimann A, Klumpp B et al (2007) Assessment of myocardial viability in a reperfused porcine model: evaluation of different MSCT contrast protocols in acute and subacute infarct stages in comparison with MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:290–298PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Buecker A, Katoh M, Krombach GA et al (2005) A feasibility study of contrast enhancement of acute myocardial infarction in multislice computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and gross morphology in pigs. Invest Radiol 40:700–704PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mahnken AH, Koos R, Katoh M et al (2005) Assessment of myocardial viability in reperfused acute myocardial infarction using 16-slice computed tomography in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:2042–2047PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Blumenthal RS et al (2006) Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Committee on cardiovascular imaging and intervention, council on cardiovascular radiology and intervention, and committee on cardiac imaging, council on clinical cardiology. Circulation 114:1761–1791PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cademartiri F, Schuijf JD, Pugliese F et al (2007) Usefulness of 64-slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography to assess in-stent restenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:2204–2210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hoffmann U, Nagurney JT, Moselewski F et al (2006) Coronary multidetector computed tomography in the assessment of patients with acute chest pain. Circulation 114:2251–2260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CA et al (2005) High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 112:2318–2323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Habis M, Capderou A, Ghostine S et al (2007) Acute myocardial infarction early viability assessment by 64-slice computed tomography immediately after coronary angiography: comparison with low-dose dobutamine echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:1178–1185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Koyama Y, Matsuoka H, Mochizuki T et al (2005) Assessment of reperfused acute myocardial infarction with two-phase contrast-enhanced helical CT: prediction of left ventricular function and wall thickness. Radiology 235:804–811PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Paul JF, Wartski M, Caussin C et al (2005) Late defect on delayed contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT scans in the prediction of SPECT infarct size after reperfused acute myocardial infarction: initial experience. Radiology 236:485–489PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Simon GH, Fu Y, Berejnoi K et al (2005) Initial computed tomography imaging experience using a new macromolecular iodinated contrast medium in experimental breast cancer. Invest Radiol 40:614–620PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Service d’imagerie Médicale Adulte CHU la TimoneMarseille, Cedex 05France
  2. 2.Centre de Résonance Magnétique Biologique et Médicale (CRMBM) Faculté de Médecine de MarseilleUniversité de la MéditerranéeMarseilleFrance

Personalised recommendations