Abstract
This paper investigates the role of comparison classes in the semantics of gradable adjectives in the positive form, focusing on the case where the comparison class is expressed overtly via a for-phrase (e.g. John is tall for a jockey). Two central questions are addressed: what information does the comparison class provide, and how is this information integrated compositionally? It is shown that the standard of comparison invoked by the positive form can be analyzed as a range of values whose width is based on the degree of dispersion in the comparison class. Compositionally, the comparison class can be analyzed as an argument of a null positive morpheme (contra Kennedy [13]), in parallel to recent proposals for the superlative (e.g. Heim [9]). The implications of the analysis for the choice between degree- and delineation-based analyses of gradable adjectives are discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bale, A.C.: A universal scale of comparison. Linguistics and Philosophy 31(1), 1–55 (2008)
Barner, D., Snedeker, J.: Compositionality and statistics in adjective acquisition: 4-year-olds interpret tall and short based on the size distributions of novel noun referents. Child Development 79, 594–608 (2008)
Bartsch, R., Vennemann, T.: Semantic structures: A study in the relation between syntax and semantics. Athaenum Verlag, Frankfurt (1973)
Bhatt, R., Pancheva, R.: Late merger of degree clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 35, 1–45 (2004)
Cresswell, M.J.: The semantics of degree. In: Partee, B. (ed.) Montague Grammar, pp. 261–292. Academic Press, New York (1977)
Cruse, D.: Lexical Semantics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1986)
Fara, D.: Shifting sands: an interest-relative theory of vagueness. Philosophical Topics 28, 45–81 (2000)
Fults, S.: The structure of comparsion: an investigation of gradable adjectives Phd dissertation, University of Maryland (2006)
Heim, I.: Notes on superlatives (1999) (unpublished manuscript)
Heim, I.: Degree operators and scope. In: Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) X. CLC Publications (2000)
Heim, I.: Little. In: Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) XVI. CLC Publications (2006)
Kennedy, C.: Projecting the adjective: the syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. Outstanding dissertations in linguistics. Garland, New York (1999)
Kennedy, C.: Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable predicates. Linguistics and Philosophy 30, 1–45 (2007)
Klein, E.: A semantics for positive and comparative adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 4(1-45) (1980)
Rett, J.: Degree modification in natural language. Phd dissertation, Rutgers University (2008)
van Rooij, R.: Implicit versus explicit comparatives. In: Egre, P., Klinedienst, N. (eds.) Vagueness and Language Use. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2010)
von Stechow, A.: Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics 3, 1–77 (1984)
von Stechow, A.: Times as degrees: früh(er) ’early(er)’, spät(er) ’late(r)’, and phrase adverbs (2006) (unpublished manuscript)
Szabolcsi, A.: Comparative superlatives. Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, MITWPL 8, 245–266 (1986)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Solt, S. (2011). Notes on the Comparison Class. In: Nouwen, R., van Rooij, R., Sauerland, U., Schmitz, HC. (eds) Vagueness in Communication. VIC 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6517. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18446-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18446-8_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-18445-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-18446-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)