Skip to main content

Notes on the Comparison Class

  • Conference paper
Vagueness in Communication (VIC 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6517))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper investigates the role of comparison classes in the semantics of gradable adjectives in the positive form, focusing on the case where the comparison class is expressed overtly via a for-phrase (e.g. John is tall for a jockey). Two central questions are addressed: what information does the comparison class provide, and how is this information integrated compositionally? It is shown that the standard of comparison invoked by the positive form can be analyzed as a range of values whose width is based on the degree of dispersion in the comparison class. Compositionally, the comparison class can be analyzed as an argument of a null positive morpheme (contra Kennedy [13]), in parallel to recent proposals for the superlative (e.g. Heim [9]). The implications of the analysis for the choice between degree- and delineation-based analyses of gradable adjectives are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bale, A.C.: A universal scale of comparison. Linguistics and Philosophy 31(1), 1–55 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barner, D., Snedeker, J.: Compositionality and statistics in adjective acquisition: 4-year-olds interpret tall and short based on the size distributions of novel noun referents. Child Development 79, 594–608 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bartsch, R., Vennemann, T.: Semantic structures: A study in the relation between syntax and semantics. Athaenum Verlag, Frankfurt (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bhatt, R., Pancheva, R.: Late merger of degree clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 35, 1–45 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cresswell, M.J.: The semantics of degree. In: Partee, B. (ed.) Montague Grammar, pp. 261–292. Academic Press, New York (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cruse, D.: Lexical Semantics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fara, D.: Shifting sands: an interest-relative theory of vagueness. Philosophical Topics 28, 45–81 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fults, S.: The structure of comparsion: an investigation of gradable adjectives Phd dissertation, University of Maryland (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Heim, I.: Notes on superlatives (1999) (unpublished manuscript)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Heim, I.: Degree operators and scope. In: Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) X. CLC Publications (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Heim, I.: Little. In: Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) XVI. CLC Publications (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kennedy, C.: Projecting the adjective: the syntax and semantics of gradability and comparison. Outstanding dissertations in linguistics. Garland, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kennedy, C.: Vagueness and grammar: The semantics of relative and absolute gradable predicates. Linguistics and Philosophy 30, 1–45 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Klein, E.: A semantics for positive and comparative adjectives. Linguistics and Philosophy 4(1-45) (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rett, J.: Degree modification in natural language. Phd dissertation, Rutgers University (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. van Rooij, R.: Implicit versus explicit comparatives. In: Egre, P., Klinedienst, N. (eds.) Vagueness and Language Use. Palgrave Macmillan, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. von Stechow, A.: Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics 3, 1–77 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. von Stechow, A.: Times as degrees: früh(er) ’early(er)’, spät(er) ’late(r)’, and phrase adverbs (2006) (unpublished manuscript)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Szabolcsi, A.: Comparative superlatives. Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, MITWPL 8, 245–266 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Solt, S. (2011). Notes on the Comparison Class. In: Nouwen, R., van Rooij, R., Sauerland, U., Schmitz, HC. (eds) Vagueness in Communication. VIC 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6517. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18446-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18446-8_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-18445-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-18446-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics