Advertisement

The Corail® Hip Stem

  • Steve Young
  • Markus C. Michel
  • Tarik Aït Si Selmi
  • Camdon Fary
  • Jean-Charles Rollier
  • Jean-Claude Cartillier
  • James T. Caillouette
  • Sébastien Lustig
  • Sam Sydney
  • Bruno Balaÿ
  • Claude Charlet

Abstract

Corail® implants suit most femoral anatomies (Dorr-types A, B and C). Nevertheless, in all cases the indications need to be planned carefully taking account of the specifi c demands of the individual patient. It is important for the surgeon to understand the principle of ‘compaction broaching’ and the mechanism of fi xation using a fully hydroxyapatite-coated (HAC) stem as well as the correct implantation technique in order to achieve the best possible result for all patients. Even then, the surgeon needs to be aware that there might be some rare situations in which a different surgical technique is needed.

Keywords

Cancellous Bone Femoral Stem Femoral Canal Femoral Anteversion Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Reference_3

Reference

  1. 1.
    Nourissat C, Cartillier JC (2007) Technique de mise en place des prothèses totale de hanche sans ciment. EMC (Elsevier Masson SAS, PARIS) techniques chirurgicales. OrthopédieTraumatologie 44:667Google Scholar

Reference

  1. 1.
    Channer MA, Glisson RR, Vail TP (1996) The use of bone compaction in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 11 (6):743–749PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chareancholvanich K et al (1997) Stability of primary cemented femoral implants with compaction of existing can- cellous bone. In: 43rd annual meeting, Orthopaedic Research Society, Hilton Head Island, 1997, p 316Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coombs R, Gristina A, Hungerford D (eds) (1990) Joint replacement - state of the art. Orthotext, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cusmariu J, Glisson R, Seaber T et al (1998) Cortical strain associated with press-fit stems in revision total knee arthro- plasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80(Suppl I):35Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lewallen D (2001) Current concepts in joint replacement (Lecture)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Walker PS, Schneeweis D, Murphy S et al (1987) Strains and micromotions of press-fit femoral stem prostheses. J Biomech 20:693–702. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(87)90035-2PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reference

  1. 1.
    Bargar W, Jamali A, Nejad A (2010) Femoral anteversion in THA and its lack of correlation with native acetabular ante- version. Clin Orthop 468:527–532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dorr L, Malik A, Dastane M et al (2009) Combined antever- sion technique for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 467:119–127PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reference

  1. 1.
    Berry D (2002) Management of periprosthetic fractures; the hip. J Arthroplasty 17:11–13PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Duncan CP, Masri BA (1996) Fractures of the femur after hip replacement. Instr Course Lect 44:293–304Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reis MD (1997) Hip arthroplasty: management problems; periprosthetic fractures; early and late. Orthopedics 20: 789–800Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Taylor MM, Meyers MH, Harvey JP Jr (1978) Intraoperative femur fractures during total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 137:96–103PubMedGoogle Scholar

Reference

  1. 1.
    Blom AW, Rogers M, Taylor AH (2008) Dislocation following total hip replacement: the Avon Orthopaedic Centre experience. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 90(8):658–662PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM (2009) The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:128–133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brown GD, Swanson EA, Nercessian OA (2008) Neurologic injuries after hip arthroplasty. Am J Ortho (Belle Mead NJ) 37 (4):191Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Busch JR, Wilson M (2007) Dislocation after hip hemiar- throplasty: anterior versus posterior capsular approach. Orthopedics 30(2):138–144Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Karachalios T, Tsatsaronis C, Efraimis G et al (2004) The long-term clinical relevance of calcar atrophy caused by stress shielding in total hip arthroplasty: A 10-year, prospective, randomized study. J Arthroplasty 19(4):469–475PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kwon MS, Kuskowwski M, Mulhall KJ (2006) Does surgi- cal approach affect total hip arthroplasty dislocation rates? Clin Orthop Relat Res 447:34–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lewallen DG, Berry DJ (1997) Periprosthetic fracture of the femur after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:1181–1190Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mamoudy P (2009) Traitement des prothèses totales de hanches infectées. Conférences d’enseignement SOFCOT, 74–93Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moyad TF, Thornhill T, Estok D (2008) Evaluation and management of the infected total hip and knee. Orthopedics 31 (6):581–588PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Urquhart DM, Hanna FS, Brennan SL, Wluka AE (2010) Incidence and risk factors for deep surgical site infection after primary total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Arthroplasty 25(8): 1216–22.e3Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vastel L, Kerboul L, Antrac T (1998) Ossification hétéro- topique après arthroplastie totale de hanche. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 65:238–244PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    VanFlandern GJ (2005) Periprosthetic fractures in total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 28(9 Suppl):s1089-s1095Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steve Young
    • 1
  • Markus C. Michel
    • 2
  • Tarik Aït Si Selmi
    • 3
  • Camdon Fary
    • 4
  • Jean-Charles Rollier
    • 5
  • Jean-Claude Cartillier
    • 6
  • James T. Caillouette
    • 7
  • Sébastien Lustig
    • 8
  • Sam Sydney
    • 9
  • Bruno Balaÿ
    • 10
  • Claude Charlet
    • 11
  1. 1.Specialist in Hip and Knee SurgeryWarwick HospitalWarwick WarwickshireEngland UK
  2. 2.Orthopaedic Center Münsingen OZMMünsingenSwitzerland
  3. 3.Centre Orthopédique SantyARTRO GroupLyonFrance
  4. 4.Department of OrthopaedicsThe Royal Melbourne HospitalParkvilleAustralia
  5. 5.Saint Martin Bellevue, France, Clinique d’ArgonayARTRO GroupArgonayFrance
  6. 6.ARTRO GroupLyonFrance
  7. 7.Newport Orthopedic InstituteCaliforniaUSA
  8. 8.Centre Albert TrillatLyon Croix Rousse University HospitalLyonFrance
  9. 9.St. Agnes HospitalBaltimoneUSA
  10. 10.ARTRO GroupSaint BernardFrance
  11. 11.ARTRO GroupSaint Didier au Mont d’OrFrance

Personalised recommendations