Skip to main content

The Majority of Stockholders’ Subscription Option in SEO and Escalation of Commitment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Modeling Risk Management for Resources and Environment in China

Part of the book series: Computational Risk Management ((Comp. Risk Mgmt))

  • 1135 Accesses

Abstract

This paper empirically verifies the impact of majority of shareholders’ SEO subscription option on escalation of commitment under the Agent Theory’s framework based on the data of Chinese listed companies from 2005 to 2008. Results show that listed companies always encouraged to perform the escalation of commitment no matter major stockholders participate the subscription or not. However, compared with the participation of all major shareholders, giving up the SEO subscription option by the major shareholders will increase the possibility of escalation of commitment; furthermore, the most serious escalation will be happened if all of the major shareholders give up the subscription option, and the second serious escalation will be incurred if part of the major shareholders gives up their subscription. These conclusions contribute to comprehend the economic consequences of subscription behavior from the majority of shareholders in SEO, as well as provide a theoretical basis for China Securities Regulatory Commission to supervise and standardize the listed companies’ investment and financing activities, and reducing their investment risks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ghosh D (1997) De-Escalation strategies: some experimental evidence. Behav Res Accounting 9:88–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanodia C, Bushman R, Dickhaut J (1989) Escalation errors and the sunk cost effect: an explanation based on reputation and information asymmetries. J Acc Res 27:59–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Port R, Lopez-de-Slianes F, Shleifer A, Vishny R (1999) Corporate ownership around the world. J Finance 54:471–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng M (2007) The formation mechanism of escalation of commitment during the transition period in China. D. Nan Kai university, Tianjin

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson S (2006) Over Investment of Free Cash Flow. Rev Acc Studies 11:159–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salter S, Sharp D (2001) Agency theory and escalation of commitment: do small national culture difference Matter? Int J Accounting 36:33–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang Y, Liu Z-y (2010) Measurement of Project Escalation in Listed Companies. Theory Pract Finance Econ 31:350–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang D-l (2009) Study on factor of the escalating commitment in capital budget behaviour. Securities Market Her 2:66–71

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang Tang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Li, W., Liu, Z., Tang, Y. (2011). The Majority of Stockholders’ Subscription Option in SEO and Escalation of Commitment. In: Wu, D., Zhou, Y. (eds) Modeling Risk Management for Resources and Environment in China. Computational Risk Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18387-4_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics