Skip to main content

Epidemiology and Variability of Orthopaedic Procedures Worldwide

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
European Instructional Lectures

Part of the book series: European Instructional Lectures ((EICL,volume 11))

Abstract

1. Objectives: To analyze the age standardized incidence rates (ASIR) of Total Hip (THA) and Total Knee Arthroplasties (TKA) worldwide and to identify determinants for such incidences. Methods: Data THA (31 countries) and for TKA (28 countries) as well as social, economic, health and demographic data from several sources were analyzed. Multiple regression analysis and spatial cluster analysis were conducted. 2. Results: No association between THA and TKA and obesity, osteoarthrosis, hospital discharges and other health factors were found. On the other hand, most of the economic variables used were determinants of the THA and TKA incidence. A cluster of countries in central Europe, with higher rates for THA was identified. 3. Discussion: Accentuated differences of ASIR seemed to be explained by economic factors rather than by health needs. Perhaps quality of patient’s life is not seen as a priority in some health systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Faulkner A, Kennedy LG et al (1998) Effectiveness of hip prostheses in primary total hip replacement: a critical review of evidence and an economic model. Health Technol Assess 2(6):1–133

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kane RL, Saleh KJ et al (2003) Total knee replacement. Evidence Reports/Technology Assessment No. 86, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  3. Allepuz A, Serra-Sutton V et al (2008) Hip and knee arthroplasties in Catalonia [Spain] from 1994 to 2005. Gac Sanit 22(6):534–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ingvarsson T, Hagglund G et al (1999) Incidence of total hip replacement for primary osteoarthrosis in Iceland 1982–1996. Acta Orthop Scand 70(3):229–233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mehrotra C, Remington PL et al (2005) Trends in total knee replacement surgeries and implications for public health, 1990–2000. Public Health Rep 120(3):278–282

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lai Y-S, Wei H-W et al (2008) Incidence of hip replacement among national health insurance enrollees in Taiwan. J Orthop Surg Res 3:42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu YE, Hu S et al (2009) The epidemiology and surgical outcomes of patients undergoing primary total hip replacement: an Asian perspective. Singapore Med J 50(1):15–19

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu SS, Valle AGD et al (2009) Trends in mortality, complications, and demographics for primary hip arthroplasty in the United States. Int Orthop 33(3):643–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Memtsoudis SG, Valle AGD et al (2009) Trends in demographics, comorbidity profiles, in-hospital complications and mortality associated with primary knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 24(4):518–527

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dixon T, Shaw M et al (2004) Trends in hip and knee joint replacement: socioeconomic inequalities and projections of need. Ann Rheum Dis 63(7):825–830

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jain NB, Higgins LD et al (2005) Trends in epidemiology of knee arthroplasty in the United States, 1990–2000. Arthritis Rheum 52(12):3928–3933

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim HA, Kim S et al (2008) The epidemiology of total knee replacement in South Korea: national registry data. Rheumatolology (Oxford) 47(1):88–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kurtz S, Mowat F et al (2005) Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(7):1487–1497

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ostendorf M, Johnell O et al (2002) The epidemiology of total hip replacement in the Netherlands and Sweden: present status and future needs. Acta Orthop Scand 73(3):282–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pedersen AB, Johnsen SP et al (2005) Total hip arthroplasty in Denmark: incidence of primary operations and revisions during 1996–2002 and estimated future demands. Acta Orthop 76(2):182–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wells VM, Hearn TC et al (2002) Changing incidence of primary total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 17(3):267–273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Manek NJ, Hart D et al (2003) The association of body mass index and osteoarthritis of the knee joint: an examination of genetic and environmental influences. Arthritis Rheum 48(4):1024–1029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wendelboe AM, Hegmann KT et al (2003) Relationships between body mass indices and surgical replacements of knee and hip joints. Am J Prev Med 25(4):290–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cobos R, Latorre A et al (2010) Variability of indication criteria in knee and hip replacement: an observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 11:249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Herickhoff PK, Callaghan JJ et al (2010) Primary hip and knee replacement: “are we all operating on the same patients, even at the same institution?”. Iowa Orthop J 30:109–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kurtz S, Ong K et al (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(4):780–785

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Khatod M, Inacio M et al (2008) Knee replacement: epidemiology, outcomes, and trends in Southern California: 17,080 replacements from 1995 through 2004. Acta Orthop 79(6):812–819

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fevang BT, Lie SA et al (2010) Improved results of primary total hip replacement. Acta Orthop 81(6):649–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM et al (2009) The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(1):128–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM et al (2010) The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(1):45–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Stargardt T (2008) Health service costs in Europe: cost and reimbursement of primary hip replacement in nine countries. Health Econ 17(1 Suppl):S9–S20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Labek G, Janda W et al (2010) Organisation, data evaluation, interpretation and effect of arthroplasty register data on the outcome in terms of revision rate in total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 35(2):157–163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Serra-Sutton V, Allepuz A et al (2009) Arthroplasty registers: a review of international experiences. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 25(1):63–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Labek G (2009) Handbook for the development and operation of an outcome register for medical devices [Available from: http://www.ear.efort.org/getdoc/932a6677-3167-4615-80f5-2b3c5df9c824/HandbookRegisterdevelopmentfinal.aspx]

  30. (2010) Raport 2010 – Endoprotezarea de Sold in perioada 2003–2009, Registrul National de Endoprotezare [Available from: http://www.rne.ro/rnemedia/download/RNE_Raport_2010_Sold.pdf]

  31. (2006) National Register of Joint Replacement, Coordination center for departmental medical information systems. Czech Rep. Arthroplasty Register. [Available from: http://www.ksrzis.cz/]

  32. Nečas L, Katina S et al (2010) Six years of Slovakian arthroplasty register, 2003–2008 data analysis. 11th EFORT Congress Madrid 2010. [Available from: https://sar.mfn.sk/]

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bergen HF, H (2009) Annual Report 2009, Norway, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen [Available from: http://www.haukeland.no/nrl/]

  34. https://www,cia,gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2172,html, Retrieved Dec 2010

    Google Scholar 

  35. http://hdrstats,undp,org/en/indicators/49806,html, Retrieved Dec 2010

    Google Scholar 

  36. National Joint Registry (NJR) (2010) 7th annual report, surgical data to December 2009, National Joint Registry for England and Wales

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bailey T, Gatrell A (1995) Interactive spatial data analysis. Longman, London

    Google Scholar 

  38. Anselin L (1995) Local indicators of spatial association — LISA. Geogr Anal 27(2):93–115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria de Fatima de Pina .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 EFORT

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Fatima de Pina, M., Ribeiro, A.I., Santos, C. (2011). Epidemiology and Variability of Orthopaedic Procedures Worldwide. In: Bentley, G. (eds) European Instructional Lectures. European Instructional Lectures, vol 11. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18321-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18321-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-18320-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-18321-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics