Advertisement

Electrodynamic Force Transducers

  • Dan Mihai Ştefănescu

Abstract

Table 8.1, including two redrawn figures after Antonin Platil [8.1], shows the main characteristics of electromagnetic and electrodynamic devices, as well as their fundamental difference: voltages are induced by transformation or by moving. Certain authors use interchangeably the two words; they have the same “root.” These terms, like their defined phenomena, are strongly connected.

Keywords

Natural Rubber Electromagnetic Force Circuit Breaker Capacitive Sensor Active Vibration Control 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Platil, A.: Mechatronics sensors: Direct measurement of velocity. PDF (January 2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Rival, M., Blancfene, M., Grelier, C.: Circuit breaker with high electrodynamic force and breaking capacity. Abstract of JP 2000106075, data supplied from the esp@cenet database, May 9 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Iwatani, Y., Torii, S.: Analysis of electromagnetic force of electrodynamic suspension with quasi-three dimensional analysis. International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics 25(1-4), 61–67 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tomion, M.: StarDrive Engineering. US Patent 6404089, June 11 (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reber, D.: Electrodynamic force compensation devices in mass comparators. In: Proc. 13th Int’l Conf. Force and Mass Measurement, Helsinki, Finland, May 11-14, pp. 205–210 (1993)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Northrop, R.B.: Introduction to Instrumentation and Measurements. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1997)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pedraza, B.: Computer aided modelling and design of electrodynamic force transducers. Electronics and Electrical Engineering, computer science in UK Collections. City University of London (1983)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grice, R.M., Pinnington, R.J.: An electrodynamic shaker with an integral force gauge for high-frequency measurements on lightweight structures. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C, vol. 214(10), pp. 1285–1297 (2000)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lozina, Z., Vučina, D., Sedlar, D.: Active vibration control of electro-mechanical system with step excitation and electromagnetic actuator. In: Procs. Int’l Symp. Coupled Methods in Numerical Dynamics, Split, Croatia, September 16-19, pp. 345–350 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Engel, R., Baade, H.-J.: New-design dual-balance gravimetric reference system with PTB’s new ’Hydrodynamic Test Field’. In: Proc. 11th Int’l Conf. Flow Measurement – FLOMEKO, Groningen, The Netherlands, May 12-14 (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    New force measuring device from 10 mN to 10 N. Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Annual Report (2002), http://ptb.de/en/publikationen/jahresberichte/jb2002/nachrdjahres/s16e.html
  13. 13.
    Gast, T.: The impact of feedback on the determination of masses and forces in controlled atmospheres. Termochimica Acta 236, 277–290 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Klyushin, J.G.: On electrodynamic forces. Reprint of the Academy of Civil Aviation, St. Petersburg, Russia, May 12 (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kolomenskii, A.A., Jerebtsov, S.N., Stoker, J.A., Scully, M.O., Schüssler, H.A.: Storage and light scattering of microparticles in a ring-type electrodynamic trap. Journal of Applied Physics 102(9), Paper 094902 (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Göbel, G., Wriedt, T., Bauckhage, K.: Periodic drag force and particle size measurement in a double ring electrodynamic trap. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 68(8), Paper 3046 (1997)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li, W., Davis, E.J.: Measurement of the thermophoretic force by electrodynamic levitation: Microspheres in air. Journal of Aerosol Science 26(7), 1063–1083 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shi, S., Redding, B., Creazzo, T., Marchena, E., Prather, D.W.: Quantum electro-dynamic modeling of silicon-based active devices. Advances in Optical Technologies, Article ID 615393 (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Richoux, B., Lemarquand, G., Lemarquand, V.: Electrodynamic transducer and use thereof in loudspeakers and geophones. US Patent Application No. 2009 0028375, January 29 (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fischer, P.: Electrodynamic force measuring apparatus. US Patent 4020687, May 3 (1977)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Huan, Y., Zhang, T., Yang, Y.: A moving-coil designed micro-mechanics tester with application on MEMS. Meas. Sci. Technol. 18(11), 3612–3616 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Urry, S.: Plantar pressure-measurement sensors (review article). Measurement Science and Technology 10, R16–R32 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Warren-Forward, M.J., Goodall, R.M., Pratt, D.J.: Three dimensional displacement and force transducer. IEEE Proceedings A 139, 21–29 (1992)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chi, Z., Shida, K.: A new multifunctional tactile sensor for three-dimensional force measurement. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical 111, 172–179 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dan Mihai Ştefănescu

    There are no affiliations available

    Personalised recommendations