Abstract
Journalism is generally expected to be objective and neutral—not influenced by political power. Conversely, Italian televised journalism often appears influenced by the distribution of political power. The current study investigates the impact of political changes in Italy on journalistic questioning techniques. Using new software with multimodal and interactive characteristics (Si.Co.D.), we examined the interrogation styles of two interviewers (Vespa and Ferrara), one (Vespa) working for a public television channel (Rai2) and the other (Ferrara) for a private television channel (La7). Specifically, we compared the level of coercion used by these interviewers when questioning politicians from both the center-right and center-left, before and after two elections (2004 European and 2005 Regional elections) that were favorable to the opposition (at the time, center-left). Results showed that the interviewers became more coercive toward the winning coalition (center-left) but in different ways: Vespa reduced his coerciveness toward the governing wing, whereas Ferrara increased his coerciveness toward the opposition. Results are discussed with attention to the political implications of this journalistic bias.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Gnisci, A., Bonaiuto, M.: Grilling politicians: Politicians’ answers to questions in television interviews and legal examinations. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 22, 384–413 (2003)
Bull, P.: Slipperiness, evasion, and ambiguity. Equivocation and facework in non committal political discourse. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 27, 333–344 (2008)
Gnisci, A.: Coercive and Face-Threatening Questions to Left-Wing and Right-Wing Politicians During Two Italian Broadcasts: Conversational Indexes of Par Conditio for Democracy Systems. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 38, 1179–1210 (2008)
Ignazi, P.: Italy. Eur. J. Polit. Res 44, 1063–1070 (2005)
Ignazi, P.: Italy. Eur. J. Polit. Res. 45, 1143–1151 (2006)
Bull, P., Elliott, J.: Level of threat: Means of assessing interviewer toughness and neutrality. J. Lang. Soc. Psychol. 17, 220–244 (1998)
Danet, B., Hoffman, K.B., Kermish, N., Rafn, H.J., Stayman, D.G.: An ethnography of questioning in the courtroom. In: Shuy, R.W., Shnukal, A. (eds.) Language use and the uses of language, pp. 222–234. Georgetown University Press, Washington (1976)
Harris, S.: Interviewers’ questions in broadcast interviews. Belfast Working Papers in Language and Linguistics 8, 50–85 (1986)
Woodbury, H.: The strategic use of questions in court. Semiotica 48, 197–228 (1984)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Di Conza, A., Gnisci, A., Caputo, A. (2011). Interviewers’ Use of Coercive Questioning during a Midterm Period Favorable to the Opposition Party. In: Esposito, A., Esposito, A.M., Martone, R., Müller, V.C., Scarpetta, G. (eds) Toward Autonomous, Adaptive, and Context-Aware Multimodal Interfaces. Theoretical and Practical Issues. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6456. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18184-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18184-9_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-18183-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-18184-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)