Ubiquitous Life Support Systems for an Ageing Society in Japan
Japan is hit hardly by the consequences of demographic change. The awareness concerning this problem and the accompanying social and economic problems is high in Japan. In order to increase the development and distribution of new ICT and MST-based technologies and also to maintain an international leadership here, the Japanese government deliberately increases on the one hand the awareness of future problems, and promotes on the other hand particularly "ubiquitous" high-tech-systems to solve problems arising with the demographic change. The Paper is based on a study for the German BMBF in which about 100 Japanese assistance technologies, concepts and related business models had been analyzed and categorized.
KeywordsBusiness Model Assistance System Ageing Society Mass Customization Living Space
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.MIC Ministry of International Affairs and Communication Google Scholar
- 2.Fürstenberg, F.: Alter und Altern in Japan, BAGSO Archiv. http://www.bagso.de/693.html, Website zuletzt besucht (July 18, 2010)
- 3.Pluntke, A., Osiander, A.: Altenpflege in Japan und Deutschland. In: Seminar: “Aktuelle gesellschaftliche Probleme in Japan und Deutschland - Keio interaktiv” - Keio Projekt, Dresden (2003)Google Scholar
- 4.NICT National Institute of Information and Communication TechnologyGoogle Scholar
- 5.MMC Mikro Machine Center JapanGoogle Scholar
- 6.AIST National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and TechnologyGoogle Scholar
- 7.NEDO New Energy and Industrial Technology Development OrganizationGoogle Scholar
- 8.Linner, T., Bock, T.: Smart Customization in Architecture: towards customizable intelligent Buildings. In: Conference on Mass Customization, Personalization and Co-creation, Helsinki (Oktober 2009)Google Scholar
- 9.Bock, T., Linner, T.: Mass Customization in a knowledge-based Construction Industry for sustainable high-performance Building Production. In: CIB World Congress 2010, Manchester/Salford (May 2010)Google Scholar