Skip to main content

The Hierarchy of the Criteria

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Multicriteria Analysis

Abstract

It has become more and more difficult to assess the consequences of water resources and environmental decisions in a single-dimensional way and to use only one criterion when judging their characteristics and making comparisons. However in practice the water and environmental managers always compare, rank, and then select decision alternatives with respect to only a specific criterion. A single criterion of choice can be fully satisfactory only in very simple and straightforward situations. For example, they may select the largest water transfer scheme from a lake, but they might worry whether the largest water transfer scheme is the least expensive, the most reliable, and the most suitable for the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aravossis K, Anagnostopoulos P, Koungolos A, Vliamos S (2003) An innovative cost-benefit analysis as a decision support system for the evaluation of alternative scenarios of water resources management. Fresenius Environ Bull 12(12):1433–1443

    Google Scholar 

  • Ardakanian R, Zarghami M (2004) Sustainability criteria for ranking of water resources projects. First national conference on water resources management. Iranian Water Resources Association, Tehran

    Google Scholar 

  • ASCE Task Committee on Sustainability Criteria (1998) Sustainability criteria for water resources systems. ASCE, Reston

    Google Scholar 

  • IVM (2005) Institute of Value Management. http://www.ivm.org.uk/vm_whatis.htm

  • Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1993) Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Loucks DP, van Beek E (2005) Water resources systems planning and management: an introduction to methods, models and applications. UNESCO, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Energy (MOE) (2003) Long-term development strategies for Iran’s water resources. Iran Water Resources Management Company, Iran

    Google Scholar 

  • Netto CO, Parent E, Duckstein L (1996) Multicriterion design of long-term water supply in southern France. J Water Resour Plann Manage 122(6):403–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy B (1994) Decision aid and decision making. In: Bana et Costa C (ed) Readings in multiple criteria decision aid. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 18–35

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO, Working Group M. IV (1999) Sustainability criteria for water resources systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2007) Strategic environmental assessment and integrated water resources management and development. Environment Department of World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahdi Zarghami .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zarghami, M., Szidarovszky, F. (2011). The Hierarchy of the Criteria. In: Multicriteria Analysis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17937-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics