Abstract
In this contribution we propose a method for generating OWA weighting vectors from the individual assessments on a set of alternatives in such a way that these weights minimize the disagreement among individual assessments and the outcome provided by the OWA operator. For measuring that disagreement we have aggregated distances between individual and collective assessments by using a metric and an aggregation function. We have paid attention to Manhattan and Chebyshev metrics and arithmetic mean and maximum as aggregation functions. In this setting, we have proven that medians and the mid-range are the solutions for some cases. When a general solution is not available, we have provided some mathematical programs for solving the problem.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Beliakov, G., Pradera, A., Calvo, T.: Aggregation Functions: A Guide for Practicioners. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Brams, S.J., Kilgour, M., Sanver, M.R.: A minimax procedure for electing committees. Public Choice 132, 401–420 (2007)
Calvo, T., Kolesárova, A.: Komorníková, M., Mesiar, R.: Aggregation operators: Properties, classes and construction methods. In: Calvo, T., Mayor, G., Mesiar, R. (eds.) Aggregation Operators: New Trends and Applications, pp. 3–104. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg (2002)
Filev, D., Yager, R.R.: On the issue of obtaining OWA operator weights. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 94, 157–169 (1998)
Fodor, J., Roubens, M.: Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Multicriteria Decision Support. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1994)
Grabisch, M., Orlovski, S.A., Yager, R.R.: Fuzzy aggregation of numerical preferences. In: Slowinski, R. (ed.) Fuzzy Sets in Decision Analysis, Operations and Statistics, pp. 31–68. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (1998)
O’Hagan, M.: Aggregating template rule antecedents in real-time expert systems with fuzzy set logic. In: Proc. 22nd Annual IEEE Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, pp. 681–689. Pacific Grove, California (1988)
Wang, Y.M., Parkan, C.: A minimax disparity approach for obtaining OWA operator weights. Inform. Sci. 175, 20–29 (2005)
Xu, Z.: An overview of methods for determining OWA weights. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 20, 843–865 (2005)
Yager, R.R.: On ordered weighted averaging operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. 18, 183–190 (1988)
Yager, R.R.: Centered OWA operators. Soft Comput. 11, 631–639 (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
García-Lapresta, J.L., Llamazares, B., Peña, T. (2011). Generating OWA Weights from Individual Assessments. In: Yager, R.R., Kacprzyk, J., Beliakov, G. (eds) Recent Developments in the Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators: Theory and Practice. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 265. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17910-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17910-5_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-17909-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-17910-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)