Skip to main content

Extent of SMAS Advancement in Facelift with or without Zygomaticus Major Muscle Release

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advanced Surgical Facial Rejuvenation
  • 2919 Accesses

Abstract

While skin excisions serve to tighten skin and reduce wrinkles, skin does not function well as a supportive structure. The most substantial addition to the myriad of techniques has been Incorporation of SMAS advancement and the lifting and anchoring of midface soft tissue. Liposuction or direct fat excision of the jowl can reduce fullness low in the cheek. When patients have more extensive jowling, then maximal movement of the SMAS medially becomes necessary for correction. SMAS flap release can define the extent of movement medially and laterally. The author discusses the strategy and selection of SMAS flap. Multiple strategies have evolved to maximize midface soft tissue repositioning. In order to maximize SMAS lifting, various authors have advocated more aggressive elevation and release of the retaining ligaments. Challenges still lie in the selection of the most advantageous flap design for a specific set of contour abnormalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Mentz H, Ruiz-Razura A, Patronella C, Newall G. Facelift: measurement of superficial muscular aponeurotic system advancement with and without zygomaticus major muscle release. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2005;29(5):353–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mentz H. Multilayer rhytidectomy. In: Evans G, editor. Operative plastic surgery. New York: McGraw Hill; 2000. p. 143–62.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marten TJ. Facelift. Planning and technique. Clin Plast Surg. 1997;24(2):269–308.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Massiha H. Short scar face lift with extended SMAS platysma dissection, lifting and limited skin undermining. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(2):663–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Saulis A, Lautenschlager E, Mustoe TA. Biomechanical and viscoelastic properties of skin, SMAS, and composite flaps as they pertain to rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110(2):590–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ivy E, Lorenc Z, Aston S. Is there a difference? A prospective study comparing lateral and standard SMAS face lifts with extended SMAS and composite rhytidectomies. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;98(7):1135–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stuzin JM, Baker TJ, Gordon HL, Baker TM. Extended SMAS dissection as an approach to midface rejuvenation. Clin Plast Surg. 1995;22(2):295–311.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Connell BF, Semlacher RA. Contemporary deep layer facial rejuvenation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100(6):1513–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Baker TJ, Stuzin JM. Personal technique of face lifting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100(2):502–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Baker DC. Lateral SMASectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100(2):509–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stuzin J, Baker TJ, Baker TM. Refinements in face lifting: enhanced facial contour using vicryl mesh incorporated into SMAS fixation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(1):290–301.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Furnas D. The retaining ligaments of the check. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;83(1):11–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hamra ST. The deep-plane rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86(1):53–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mendelson BC. Extended sub SMAS dissection and cheek elevation. Clin Plast Surg. 1995;22(2):325–39.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hamra ST. Composite rhytidectomy. St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stuzin JM, Baker TJ, Gordon HL. The relationship of the superficial and deep facial fascias: relevance to ­rhytidectomy and aging. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;89(3):441–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hagerty RC. Central suspension technique of the mid-face. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995;96(3):728–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Teimourian B, Delia S, Wahrman A. The multiplane face lift. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;93(1):78–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Owsley JQ Jr. Platysma-fascial rhytidectomy: a preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;60(6):843–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Owsley JQ Jr. SMAS-platysma face lift. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;71(4):573–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Owsley JQ Jr. Re.: Vilain: Dallas platysmaplasty (letter). Ann Plast Surg. 1985;14:98.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hamra ST. The tri-plane facelift dissection. Ann Plast Surg. 1984;12:268.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lemmon ML. Superficial fascia rhytidectomy. A restoration of the SMAS with control of the cervicomental angle. Clin Plast Surg. 1983;10:449.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. McKinney P, Tresley GE. The “maxi-SMAS”: management of the platysma bands in rhytidectomy. Ann Plast Srug. 1984;12:260.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Anderson RD, Lo MW. Endoscopic malar/midface suspension procedure. Plast Reconst Surg. 1998;102:2196.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mentz, Newall. Endoscopic Facelifting Techniques, Malar Suspension. Annual Meeting of the International College of Surgeons, Cancun, Mexico, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stuzin, Wagstrom, Kawamoto, Wolfe. Anatomy of the frontal branch of the facial nerve: the significance of the temporal fat pad. Plast Reconst Surg. 1989;83:265–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Illouz YG, Fournier P. Illouz’s technique: collapsing surgery and body sculpture. Paris, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Teimourian B, Delia S, Wahrman A. The multiplane face lift. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;93:78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hetter GP. Facial lipolysis. In: Hetter GP, editor. Liposysis: the theory and practice of blunt suction lipectomy. Boston, MA: Little Brown & Co.; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lewis CM. Lipoplasty of the neck. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;76(2):248–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Teimourian B. Face and neck suction-assisted lipectomy associated with rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;72(5):627–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Henry A. Mentz III .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mentz, H.A. (2012). Extent of SMAS Advancement in Facelift with or without Zygomaticus Major Muscle Release. In: Erian, A., Shiffman, M. (eds) Advanced Surgical Facial Rejuvenation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17838-2_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17838-2_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-17837-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-17838-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics