Semantic Techniques for Enabling Knowledge Reuse in Conceptual Modelling

  • Jorge Gracia
  • Jochem Liem
  • Esther Lozano
  • Oscar Corcho
  • Michal Trna
  • Asunción Gómez-Pérez
  • Bert Bredeweg
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6497)

Abstract

Conceptual modelling tools allow users to construct formal representations of their conceptualisations. These models are typically developed in isolation, unrelated to other user models, thus losing the opportunity of incorporating knowledge from other existing models or ontologies that might enrich the modelling process. We propose to apply Semantic Web techniques to the context of conceptual modelling (more particularly to the domain of qualitative reasoning), to smoothly interconnect conceptual models created by different users, thus facilitating the global sharing of scientific data contained in such models and creating new learning opportunities for people who start modelling. This paper describes how semantic grounding techniques can be used during the creation of qualitative reasoning models, to bridge the gap between the imprecise user terminology and a well defined external common vocabulary. We also explore the application of ontology matching techniques between models, which can provide valuable feedback during the model construction process.

Keywords

Qualitative Reasoning Semantic Grounding Ontology Matching 

References

  1. 1.
    Aleksovski, Z., Klein, M.C.A., ten Kate, W., van Harmelen, F.: Matching unstructured vocabularies using a background ontology. In: Staab, S., Svátek, V. (eds.) EKAW 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4248, pp. 182–197. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bizer, C., Lehmann, J., Kobilarov, G., Auer, S., Becker, C., Cyganiak, R., Hellmann, S.: Dbpedia - a crystallization point for the web of data. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 7(3), 154–165 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bredeweg, B., Forbus, K.: Qualitative modeling in education. AI Magazine 24(4), 35–46 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bredeweg, B., Liem, J., Linnebank, F., Bühling, R., Wißner, M., Gracia, J., Salles, P., Beek, W., Gómez-Pérez, A.: Dynalearn: Architecture and approach for investigating conceptual system knowledge acquisition. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. LNCS, vol. 6095, ch. 42, pp. 272–274. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bredeweg, B., Linnebank, F., Bouwer, A., Liem, J.: Garp3 - workbench for qualitative modelling and simulation. Ecological Informatics 4(5-6), 263–281 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bredeweg, B., Salles, P.: Qualitative models of ecological systems – editorial introduction. Ecological Informatics 4(5-6), 261–262 (2009); Special Issue: Qualitative models of ecological systemsGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bredeweg, B., Struss, P.: Current topics in qualitative reasoning (editorial introduction). AI Magazine 24(4), 13–16 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cañas, A., Carvalho, M., Arguedas, M., Leake, D.B., Maguitman, A., Reichherzer, T.: Mining the web to suggest concepts during concept mapping: Preliminary results. In: Proc. of the First International Conference on Concept Mapping, Pamplona, Spain (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cañas, A.J., Hill, G., Carff, R., Suri, N., Lott, J., Gómez, G., Eskridge, T.C., Arroyo, M., Carvajal, R.: Cmaptools: A knowledge modeling and sharing environment. In: Proc. of the First International Conference on Concept Mapping, Pamplona, Spain, pp. 125–133 (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cohen, J.: A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20(1), 37–46 (1960)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Costanza, R., Voinov, A.: Modeling ecological and economic systems with stella: Part iii. Ecological Modelling 143(1-2), 1–7 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    d’Aquin, M.: Formally measuring agreement and disagreement in ontologies. In: Proc. of the 5th International Conference on Knowledge Capture (K-CAP 2009), pp. 145–152 (September 2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    d’Aquin, M., Baldassarre, C., Gridinoc, L., Angeletou, S., Sabou, M., Motta, E.: Characterizing knowledge on the semantic web with Watson. In: 5th International EON Workshop, at ISWC 2007, Busan, Korea (November 2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dehghani, M., Forbus, K.: QCM: A QP-based concept map system. In: Žabkar, J., Bratko, I. (eds.) The 23nd International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning (QR 2009), Ljubljana, Slovenia, pp. 16–21 (June 2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Euzenat, J.: An API for ontology alignment. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 698–712. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology matching. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)MATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Forbus, K.D., Carney, K., Sherin, B.L., UreelII, L.C.: Vmodel: A visual qualitative modeling environment for middle-school students. In: Proc. of the 16th Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, San Jose, California, USA, pp. 820–827 (July 2004)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gracia, J., Mena, E.: Ontology matching with CIDER: Evaluation report for the OAEI 2008. In: Proc. of 3rd Ontology Matching Workshop (OM 2008), at ISWC 2008, Karlsruhe, Germany, vol. 431, pp. 140–146. CEUR-WS (October 2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gracia, J., Trillo, R., Espinoza, M., Mena, E.: Querying the web: A multiontology disambiguation method. In: Sixth International Conference on Web Engineering (ICWE 2006), Palo Alto, California, USA, pp. 241–248. ACM, New York (July 2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grau, B., Horrocks, I., Motik, B., Parsia, B., Patelschneider, P., Sattler, U.: Owl 2: The next step for owl. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 6(4), 309–322 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hu, W., Qu, Y.: Falcon-ao: A practical ontology matching system. Journal of Web Semantics 6(3), 237–239 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jeremic, Z., Jovanovic, J., Gasevic, D.: Semantic web technologies for the integration of learning tools and context-aware educational services. In: Bernstein, A., Karger, D.R., Heath, T., Feigenbaum, L., Maynard, D., Motta, E., Thirunarayan, K. (eds.) ISWC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5823, pp. 860–875. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Leelawong, K., Biswas, G.: Designing learning by teaching agents: The betty’s brain system. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Ed. 18(3), 181–208 (2008)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liem, J., Bredeweg, B.: OWL and qualitative reasoning models. In: Freksa, C., Kohlhase, M., Schill, K. (eds.) KI 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4314, pp. 33–48. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Miller, G.A.: Wordnet: A lexical database for english. Communications of the ACM 38(11), 39–41 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Novak, J., Gowin, D.: Learning How to Learn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nuttle, T., Salles, P., Bredeweg, B., Neumann, M.: Representing and managing uncertainty in qualitative ecological models. Ecological informatics 4(5-6), 358–366 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Soloway, E., Pryor, A.Z., Krajcik, J.S., Jackson, S., Stratford, S.J., Wisnudel, M., Klein, J.T.: Scienceware’s model-it: Technology to support authentic science inquiry. Technological Horizons on Education 25(3), 54–56 (1997)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    van Heijst, G., Falasconi, S., Abu-Hanna, A., Schreiber, G., Stefanelli, M.: A case study in ontology library contruction. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 7(3), 227–255 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jorge Gracia
    • 1
  • Jochem Liem
    • 2
  • Esther Lozano
    • 1
  • Oscar Corcho
    • 1
  • Michal Trna
    • 1
  • Asunción Gómez-Pérez
    • 1
  • Bert Bredeweg
    • 2
  1. 1.Ontology Engineering GroupUniversidad Politécnica de MadridSpain
  2. 2.Informatics InstituteUniversity of AmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations