Abstract
Notions of Darwinian selection have been implicit in economic theory for at least sixty years. Richard Nelson and Sidney Winter have argued that while evolutionary thinking was prevalent in prewar economics, the postwar Neoclassical school became almost entirely preoccupied with equilibrium conditions and their mathematical conditions. One of the problems with the economic interpretation of firm selection through competition has been a weak grasp on an incomplete scientific paradigm. As I.F. Price notes: “The biological metaphor has long lurked in the background of management theory largely because the message of ’survival of the fittest’ (usually wrongly attributed to Charles Darwin rather than Herbert Spencer) provides a seemingly natural model for market competition (e.g. Alchian 1950, Merrell 1984, Henderson 1989, Moore 1993), without seriously challenging the underlying paradigms of what an organisation is.” [1] In this paper we examine the application of dynamic fitness landscape models to economic theory, particularly the theory of technology substitution, drawing on recent work by Kauffman, Arthur, McKelvey, Nelson and Winter, and Windrum and Birchenhall. In particular we use Professor Post’s early work with John Holland on the genetic algorithm to explain some of the key differences between static and dynamic approaches to economic modeling.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Price, I. F. “Organisational Memetics?: Organisational Learning as a Selection Process”, Management Learning, 1995 26: 299–318.
Kauffman, Stuart “The Structure of Rugged Fitness Landscapes” in The Origins of Order, Oxford University Press, 1993.
Fellman, Philip V., Post, J.V., Wright R., and Dasari, U. “Adaptation and Coevolution on an Emergent Global Competitive Landscape” Interjournal Complex Systems, 1001, at http://www.interjournal.org
Smith, E., J. D. Farmer, L. Gillemot, and S. Krishnamurthy. “Statistical Theory of the Continuous Double Auction.” Quant. Fin. 3(6) (2003): 481–514.
McKelvey, Bill (1999) “Avoiding Complexity Catastrophe in Coevolutionary Pockets: Strategies for Rugged Landscapes”, Organization Science, Vol. 10, No. 3, May-June 1999 pp. 294–321.
Windrum, P., Birchenhall, C, (2001) ‘Modeling technological successions in the presence of network externalities’, Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics Conference in Honour of Richard Nelson and Sydney Winter, Aalborg, 12th–15th June 2001.
Sharon Mertz, Adam Groothuis and Philip V. Fellman, “Dynamic Modeling of New Technology Succession: Projecting the Impact of Macro Events and Micro Behaviors on Software Market Cycles”, in Unifying Themes in Complex Systems, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Complex Systems, Eds. Ali Minai, Dan Braha and Yaneer Bar-Yam, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2008.
Modis, Theodore, Conquering Uncertainty, McGraw-Hill, 1998.
Aoki, Masahiko (2001) “The Co-Evolution of Organizational Conventions and Human Asset Types,” in Groups, Multi-Level Selection, and Evolutionary Dynamics, The Santa Fe Institute, January 12-4, 2001 http://www.santate.edu/files/workshops/bowles/aokiV.PDF
Lissack, Michael, “Chaos and Complexity: What Does That Have to Do with Knowledge Management?”, in Knowledge Management: Organization, Competence and Methodology, ed. J. F. Schreinemakers, Ergon Verlog 1: 62–81 (Wurzburg: 1996).
Arthur, W. Brian “Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events”, Economic Journal 99: 116–131.
Holland, John H., Hidden Order: how adaptation builds complexity, Addison-Wesley (New Jersey 1995).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fellman, P.V., Post, J.V., Wright, R., Dasari, U. (2011). Adaptation and Coevolution on an Emergent Global Competitive Landscape. In: Minai, A.A., Braha, D., Bar-Yam, Y. (eds) Unifying Themes in Complex Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17635-7_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17635-7_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-17634-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-17635-7
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)