Advertisement

Deploying Wireless Sensor Networking Technology in a Rescue Team Context

  • Ben McCarthy
  • Socrates Varakliotis
  • Christopher Edwards
  • Utz Roedig
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6511)

Abstract

The computing department at Lancaster University are currently involved in the ongoing deployment of an advanced communications system designed to support the requirements of search and rescue teams. This system is based around the concept of using an all IP infrastructure to provide multi-functional data communications (such as group voice calling, live video streaming and location updates) to highly mobile vehicles and personnel in challenging environments. In addition to these types of data communications there is also a requirement to reliably transmit different types of sensor data information from the individual rescue team members, their vehicles and the casualties they locate and rescue. In this paper we describe the work we have carried out to incorporate an IP based sensor networking approach into our existing communications system deployment that we have in place with the Morecambe Bay Search and Rescue Team, in order to support Mobile Sensor Networks. In addition, we present results from our experimentation with our deployment that is specifically focused on the issue of wireless interference that our Mobile Sensor Networking solution is potentially subjected to.

Keywords

Sensor Node Home Agent Body Area Network Gateway Node Rescue Team 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Morecambe Bay Search and Rescue, http://baysearchandrescue.org.uk/
  2. 2.
    McCarthy, B., Edwards, C., Dunmore, M.: Using NEMO to Support the Global Reachability of MANET Nodes. In: Proceedings of Twenty Eighth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM 2009), Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, April 19–24 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Montenegro, G., Kushalnagar, N., Hui, J., Culler, D.: Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IEEE 802.15.4 Networks. IETF RFC 4944 (September 2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thubert, P., et al.: NEMO Basic Support Protocol. IETF RFC 3963 (January 2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    McCarthy, B., Edwards, C., Varkliotis, S., Kirstein, P.: Incorporating mobile sensor networks into the internet - an all ip approach. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Mobility in the Evolving Internet Architecture (MOBIARCH 2010). ACM, Chicago (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lippert embedded systems homepage, http://www.lippertembedded.de/index.php
  7. 7.
    The Contiki operating system, http://www.sics.se/contiki
  8. 8.
    Smartlife technology homepage, http://www.smartlifetech.com/
  9. 9.
    Nonin mdical inc, onyx ii 9560 wireless pulse oximeter homepage, http://nonin.com/PulseOximetry/Fingertip/Onyx9560
  10. 10.
    Handziski, V., Hauer, J., Wolisz, A.: Experimental study of the impact of wlan interference on ieee 802.15.4 body area networks. HotEmNets (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cypher, D., Golmie, N., Rebala, O.: Performance analysis of low rate wireless technologies for medical applications. Computer Communications 28(10), 1255–1275 (2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Howitt, I., Gutierrez, J.: Ieee 802.15.4 low rate - wireless personal area network coexistence issues. In: Wireless Communications and Networking, WCNC 2003, vol. 3, pp. 1481–1486. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pollin, S., Hodge, B., Tan, I., Chun, C., Bahai, A.: Harmful coexistence between 802.15.4 and 802.11: A measurement-based study. In: 3rd International Conference on Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks and Communications, CrownCom 2008, pp. 1–6 (May 2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ben McCarthy
    • 1
  • Socrates Varakliotis
    • 2
  • Christopher Edwards
    • 1
  • Utz Roedig
    • 1
  1. 1.Computing Department, Infolab 21Lancaster UniversityLondonUK
  2. 2.Computer Science DepartmentUniversity College LondonLancasterUK

Personalised recommendations