Advertisement

The Role of SOA for BPO Intention – Proposing a Research Model

  • Daniel Beimborn
  • Nils Joachim
  • Frank Schlosser
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 52)

Abstract

How does the availability of an Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) within a firm affect the potential of and intention for outsourcing business activities? Since one of the promises of SOA is to modularize the IT representation of business processes, it should facilitate business process outsourcing (BPO) in terms of buying the provision of single business functionalities. In this paper, we develop a conceptual research model that theorizes the relationship between SOA and BPO intention.

Keywords

Service-oriented architecture (SOA) business process outsourcing (BPO) business flexibility modularity standards research model development 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Rouse, A.C., Corbitt, B.: IT-supported Business Process Outsourcing (BPO): the good, the bad, and the ugly. In: Proceedings of the 8th Pacific-Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS), Shanghai (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Umar, A.: IT Infrastructure to Enable Next Generation Enterprises. Information Systems Frontiers 7(3), 217–256 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gewald, H., Dibbern, J.: Risks and Benefits of Business Process Outsourcing: A Study of Transaction Services in the German Banking Industry. Information & Management 46(4), 249–257 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pfannenstein, L.L., Ray, J.T.: Offshore outsourcing: current and future effects on American IT industry. Information Systems Management 21(4), 72–80 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dayasindhu, N.: Information technology enabled process outsourcing and reengineering: case study of a mortgage bank. In: 10th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), New York, NY (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Braun, M.: Vom IT- zum Business Process Outsourcing. Bankmagazin. 53(2), 22 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gewald, H., Wüllenweber, K., Weitzel, T.: The Influence of Perceived Risks on Banking Managers’ Intention to Outsource Business Processes - A Study of the German Banking and Finance Industry. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 7(2), 78–96 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Willcocks, L.P., Hindle, J., Feeny, D.F., Lacity, M.C.: IT and business process outsourcing: the knowledge potential. Information Systems Management 21(4), 7–15 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wüllenweber, K., Beimborn, D., Weitzel, T., König, W.: The Impact of Process Standardization on BPO Success. Information Systems Frontiers 10(2), 211–224 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim, G.-m., Kim, S.-Y.: Exploratory Study on Effective Control Structure in Global Business Process Sourcing. Information Resource Management Journal 21(3), 101–118 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mani, D., Barua, A., Whinston, A.B.: Successfully governing business process outsourcing relationships. MIS Quarterly Executive 5(1), 15–29 (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tanriverdi, H., Konana, P., Ge, L.: The Choice of Sourcing Mechanisms for Business Processes. Information Systems Research 18(3), 280–299 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Martin, S., Beimborn, D., Parikh, M.A., Weitzel, T.: Organizational Readiness for Business Process Outsourcing: A Model of Determinants and Impact on Outsourcing Success. In: 41st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-41), Waikoloa, Hawaii (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Davenport, T.H.: The coming commoditization of processes. Harvard Business Review 83(6), 100–108 (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Abramovsky, L., Griffith, R.: Outsourcing and Offshoring of Business Services: How Important is ICT? Journal of the European Economic Association 4(2/3), 594–601 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Krafzig, D., Banke, K., Slama, D.: Enterprise SOA: Service-oriented Architecture Best Practices. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bieberstein, N., Bose, S., Fiammante, M., Jones, K., Shah, R.: Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) Compass: Business Value, Planning, and Enterprise Roadmap. IBM Press, Upper Saddle River (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Demirkan, H., Goul, M.: AMCIS 2006 Panel Summary: Towards the Service Oriented Enterprise Vision: Bridging Industry and Academics. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 18(1), 546–556 (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Erl, T.: Service-Oriented Architecture: A Field Guide to Integrating XML and Web Services. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Keen, M., Acharya, A., Bishop, S., Hopkins, A., Milinski, S., Nott, C., Robinson, R., Adams, J., Verschueren, P.: Patterns: Implementing an SOA Using an Enterprise Service Bus. IBM Redbooks (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhao, J., Tanniru, M., Zhang, L.-J.: Services computing as the foundation of enterprise agility: Overview of recent advances and introduction to the special issue. Information Systems Frontiers 9(1), 1–8 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Oh, L.-B., Leong, Y.-X., Teo, H.-H., Ravichandran, T.: Service-oriented Architecture and Organizational Integration: An Empirical Study of IT-Enabled Sustained Competitive Advantage. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Information Systems, Montreal, QC, Canada (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Beimborn, D., Joachim, N., Weitzel, T.: Drivers and Inhibitors of SOA Business Value – Conceptualizing a Research Model. In: Proceedings of the 14th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Toronto, ON, Canada (2008)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yoon, T., Carter, P.E.: Investigating the Antecedents and Benefits of SOA Implementation: A Multi-Case Study Approach. In: Proceedings of the 13th Americas Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1–11. Colorado State University, Keystone (2007)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Baskerville, R., Cavallari, M., Hjort-Madsen, K., Pries-Heje, J., Sorrentino, M., Virili, F.: Extensible Architectures: The Strategic Value of Service-Oriented Architecture in Banking. In: Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Information Systems, Regensburg, Germany (2005)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kumar, S., Dakshinamoorthy, V., Krishnan, M.S.: SOA and Information Sharing in Supply Chain: “How” Information is Shared Matters! In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Information Systems, Montreal, QC, Canada (2007)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M.: Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1980)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ang, S., Cummings, L.: Strategic response to institutional influence on information systems outsourcing. Organization Science 8(3), 235–256 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hu, Q., Saunders, C.S., Gebelt, M.: Research report: diffusion of information systems outsourcing: a reevaluation of influence sources. Information Systems Research 8(3), 288–301 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Loh, L., Venkatraman, N.: Diffusion of IT outsourcing: influence sources and the Kodak effect. Information Systems Research 3(4), 334–358 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Earl, M.J.: The risks of outsourcing IT. Sloan Management Review 37(3), 26–32 (1996)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Loh, L., Venkatraman, N.: Determinants of information technology outsourcing: a cross-sectional analysis. Journal of Management Information Systems 9(1), 7–24 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ang, S., Straub, D.W.: Production and transaction economies and IS outsourcing: a study of the U.S. banking industry. MIS Quarterly 22(4), 535–552 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lacity, M.C., Willcocks, L.P.: An empirical investigation of information technology sourcing practices: lessons from experience. MIS Quarterly 22(3), 363–408 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Dibbern, J., Goles, T., Hirschheim, R., Jayatilaka, B.: Information systems outsourcing: a survey and analysis of the literature. The DATA BASE for Advantages in Information Systems 35(4), 6–102 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Aubert, B.A., Patry, M., Rivard, S.: A Framework for Information Technology Outsourcing Risk Management. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems 36(4), 9–28 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kakabadse, A., Kakabadse, N.: Trends in outsourcing. European Management Journal 20(2), 189–198 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lammers, M.: Make, buy or share - Combining resource based view, transaction cost economics and production economies to a sourcing framework. Wirtschaftsinformatik 46(3), 204–212 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lacity, M.C., Willcocks, L.P.: Interpreting information technology sourcing decisions from a transaction cost perspective: findings and critique. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies 5(3/4), 203–244 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Cheon, M.J., Grover, V., Teng, J.T.C.: Theoretical perspectives on the outsourcing of information systems. Journal of Information Technology 10(4), 209–219 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Apte, U.M., Sobol, M.G., Hanaoka, S., Shimada, T.: IS outsourcing practices in the USA, Japan, and Finland: a comparative study. Journal of Information Technology 12(4), 289–304 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Clark, T.D.J., Zmud, R.W., McGray, G.E.: The outsourcing of information services: transforming the nature of business in the information industry. Journal of Information Technology 10(4), 221–237 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Huber, R.L.: How Continental Bank outsourced its crown jewels. Harvard Business Review 71(1), 121–129 (1993)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Saunders, C.S., Gebelt, M., Hu, Q.: Achieving success in information systems outsourcing. California Management Review 39(2), 63–79 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Grover, V., Cheon, M.J., Teng, J.T.C.: The effect of service quality and partnership on the outsourcing of information systems functions. Journal of Management Information Systems 12(4), 89–116 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Slaughter, S., Ang, S.: Employment outsourcing in information systems. Communications of the ACM 39(7), 47–54 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Smith, M., Mitra, S., Narasimhan, S.: Information systems outsourcing: a study of pre-event firm characteristics. Journal of Management Information Systems 15(2), 61–93 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Quinn, J.B., Hilmer, F.G.: Strategic outsourcing. Sloan Management Review 35(4), 43–55 (1994)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Franke, J., Wüllenweber, K.: The Impact of Potential Flexibility Gains and Losses on the Intention to Outsource Business Processes In: 14th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), Göteborg (2006)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Young-Ybarra, C., Wiersema, M.: Strategic Flexibility in Information Technology Alliances: the Influence of Transaction Cost Economics and Social Exchange Theory. Organization Science 10(4), 439–459 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Aubert, B.A., Dussault, S., Rivard, S., Patry, M.: Managing the Risk of IT Outsourcing. In: 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS-32). IEEE Computer Society, Wailea (1999)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Aubert, B.A., Patry, M., Rivard, S.: Assessing the Risk of IT Outsourcing. In: 31st Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS). IEEE Computer Society, Honolulu(1998)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Bahli, B., Rivard, S.: Validating measures of information technology outsourcing risk factors. Omega 33(2), 175–187 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Cunningham, S.M.: The Major Dimensions of Perceived Risk. In: Cox, D.F. (ed.) The Major Dimensions of Perceived Risk, Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behaviour, pp. 82–108. Harvard University Press, Boston (1967)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Tan, C., Sia, S.K.: Managing Flexibility in Outsourcing. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 7(4), 179–206 (2006)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    McFarlan, F., Nolan, R.: How to manage an IT outsourcing alliance. Sloan Management Review 36(2), 9–23 (1995)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Avison, D., Powell, P., Keen, P., Klein, J., Ward, S.: Addressing the Need for Flexibility in Information Systems. Journal of Management Information Systems 7(2), 43–60 (1995)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Lacity, M.C., Willcocks, L.P.: Global Information Technology Outsourcing: In Search of Business Advantage. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (2001)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Goolsby, K.: New Impacts on Outsourcing in 2009. Outsourcing Journal (November 2008)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Lim, B., Wen, H.J.: Web Services: An Analysis of the Technology, its Benefits, and Implementation Difficulties. Information Systems Management 20(2), 49–49 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    vom Brocke, J., Lindner, M.A.: Service Portfolio Measurement: A Framework for Evaluating the Financial Consequences of Out-tasking Decisions. In: 2nd International Conference on Service-Oriented Computing (ICSOC), New York (2004)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Benazeer, M.S., Verelst, J., van Grembergen, W., Mannaert, H.: Aligning Technology with Business - An Analysis of the Impact of SOA on Outsourcing. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology 4(3), 244–252 (2008)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    vom Brocke, J., Sonnenberg, C.: Serviceorientiertes Prozesscontrolling - Unternehmensindividuelle Wirtschaftlichkeitsrechnungen zur Nutzung serviceorientierter Architekturen bei der Prozessgestaltung. In: Nissen, V., Petsch, M., Schorscht, H. (eds.) Service-orientierte Architekturen - Chancen und Herausforderungen bei der Flexibilisierung und Integration von Unternehmensprozessen, pp. 185–204. Gabler, Wiesbaden (2008)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Müller, J., Jostock, F., Götze, J., Müller, P.: Workflow Monitoring in Service-orientierten Architekturen. In: Nissen, V., Petsch, M., Schorscht, H. (eds.) Service-orientierte Architekturen - Chancen und Herausforderungen bei der Flexibilisierung und Integration von Unternehmensprozessen, pp. 185–204. Gabler, Wiesbaden (2008)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Münstermann, B., Joachim, N., Beimborn, D.: An Empirical Evaluation of the Impact of Process Standardization on Process Performance and Flexibility. In: 15th Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), San Francisco (2009)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Ren, M., Lyytinen, K.: Building Enterprise Architecture Agility and Sustenance with SOA. Communications of the AIS 22, 75–86 (2008)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Schulte, S., Repp, N., Eckert, J., Berbner, R., Blanckenburg, K.v.: General Requirements of Banks on IT Architectures and the SOA Paradigm. In: Veit, D.J., Weitzel, T., Kundisch, D., Weinhardt, C., Rabhi, F.A., Rajola, F. (eds.) Financecom 2007. LNBIP, vol. 4, pp. 66–80. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Heutschi, R.: Serviceorientierte Architektur - Architekturprinzipien und Umsetzung in die Praxis (2007) Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Papazoglou, M.P., Heuvel, W.-J.v.d.: Service Oriented Architectures: Approaches, Technologies and Research Issues. The VLDB Journal 16, 389–415 (2007) Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Bieberstein, N., Bose, S., Walker, L., Lynch, A.: Impact of Service-Oriented Architecture on Enterprise Systems, Organizational Structures, and Individuals. IBM Systems Journal 44(4), 691–708 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Siedersleben, J.: SOA Revisited: Komponentenorientierung bei Systemlandschaften. Wirtschaftsinformatik 49(Special Issue), 110–117 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Beimborn
    • 1
  • Nils Joachim
    • 1
  • Frank Schlosser
    • 1
  1. 1.Department for Information Systems and ServicesUniversity of BambergBambergGermany

Personalised recommendations