Transmissive and Capacitive Behavior of the Unsaturated Zone in Devonian Limestones, Implications for the Functioning of the Epikarstic Aquifer: An Introduction

  • A. PoulainEmail author
  • G. Rochez
  • I. Bonniver
  • V. Hallet
Part of the Environmental Earth Sciences book series (EESCI, volume 1)


The hydrogeological behavior of the unsaturated zone in karst limestones is far to be completely understood. However, this part of aquifer systems is the most important for the vulnerability of drinking water resources. In Wallonia, the majority of tap water is provided by Devonian and Carboniferous limestones, which consist of highly karstified and fractured formations. The purpose of this research was to apply an experimental approach in order to assess the functioning of the unsaturated part of karst systems. We choose to follow two drip sites within the Han-sur-Lesse cave system (Rochefort, Belgium), the actual dataset covers the 2008–2013 period and the recording device is still active. We also conduct dye tracer experiment (uranin) from the surface with a fluorometer into the cave coupled with a drip collector. In this paper, we present the contextualization of the study site, the experimental methodology, and the first results.


Unsaturated Zone Vadose Zone Karst Aquifer Tracer Experiment Cave System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Arbel Y, Greenbaum N, Lange J, Shtober-Zisu N, Grodeck T, Wittenberg L, Inbar M (2008) Hydrologic classification of cave drip in a Mediterranean climate, based on hydrograph separation and flow mechanisms. Isr J Earth Sci 57(3–4):291–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arbel Y, Greenbaum N, Lange J, Inbar M (2010) Infiltration processes and flow rate in developed karst vadose zone using tracers in cave drips. Earth Surf Process Landforms 35:1682–1693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Genty D, Deflandre G (1998) Drip flow variation under a stalactite of the Père Noël cave (Belgium). Evidence of seasonal variation and air pressure constraints. J Hydrol 211:208–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Jex C, Mariethoz G, Baker A, Graham P, Andersen M, Acworth I, Edwards N, Azcurra C (2012) Spatially dense drip hydrological monitoring and infitration behavious at the Wellington Caves, South East Australia. Int J Speleol 41(2):283–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Klimchouk AB (2004) Toward defining, delimiting and classifying epikarst: its origin, processes and variants of geomorphic evolution. Speleogenesis Evol Karst Aquifers 2(1):1–13Google Scholar
  6. Mangin A (1975) Contribution à l’étude hydrodynamique des aquifères karstiques. Annales de Spéléol 30(1):21–124Google Scholar
  7. Scheffer N, Cohen M, Morin E, Grodek T, Gimburg A, Magal E, Gvirtzman H, Neid M, Isele D, Frumkin A (2011) Integrated cave drip monitoring for epikarst recharge estimation in a dry Mediterranean area, Sif Cave, Israel. Hydrol Process 25:2837–2845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Schudel B, Biaggi D, Dervey T, Kozel R, Müller I, Ross JH, Schindler U (2002) Einsatz kükstlichen Tracer in der Hydrogeologie—Praxishilfe. Berichte des BWG 3:91pGoogle Scholar
  9. Thornthwaite CW (1954) The measurement of potential evapotranspiration. Mather, Seabroook, 225 pGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GeologyUniversity of NamurNamurBelgium

Personalised recommendations