Abstract
In the previous chapters we focused on problems related to the representation of and reasoning with preferences. In this chapter we highlight the closeness of preference representation and other artificial intelligence fields. In particular, we shed light on conditional logics and relate them to multiple criteria aggregation and temporal reasoning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allen, J.F.: An interval-based representation of temporal knowledge. In: Hayes, P.J. (eds.), 7th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 221-226.William Kaufmann, (1981)
Condotta, J.F., Ligozat, G., Saade, M.: QAT: A qualitative algebra toolkit. In: Martineau, G., Razouk, R. (eds.), Information and Communication Technologies, pp. 3433-3438. IEEE, (2006)
Cormen, T.H., Leiserson, C.E., R.I. Rivest, R.I., Stein, C.: Introduction to Algorithms. pp. 485-488. MIT Press and McGraw-Hill (1990)
Dubois, D., Kaci, S., Prade, H.: Expressing preferences from generic rules and examples- A possibilistic approach without aggregation function. In: Godo, L. (eds.), 8th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty, pp. 293-304. Springer, (2005)
Dubois, D., Prade, H., Roubens, M., Sabbadin, R., Marichal, J.L.: The use of the discrete Sugeno integral in decision-making: a survey. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems 9(5), 539–561 (2001)
Fodor, J.: Smooth associative operations on finite ordinal scales. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 8, 791–795 (2000)
G´erard, R., Kaci, S., Prade, H.: Ranking alternatives on the basis of generic constraints and examples- A possibilistic approach. In: M. Veloso (eds.), 20th Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 393-398. (2007)
Grabisch, M.: Fuzzy integral in multicriteria decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 69, 279–298 (1995)
Grabisch, M.: The application of fuzzy integrals in multicriteria decision making. European Journal of Operational Research 89, 445–456 (1996)
Hansson, S.O.: What is ceteris paribus preference? Journal of Philosophical Logic 25, 307– 332 (1996)
Kaci, S., Piette, C.: Ordering intervals: From qualitative temporal constraint problems to preference representation. In: de Givry, S., Many, F., Marques-Silva, J. (eds.), 10th Workshop on Preferences and Soft Constraints (co-located with CP 2010), pp. 1-10. Electronic proceedings, (2010)
Kaci, S., Prade, H.: Constraints associated with Choquet integrals and other aggregation-free ranking devices. In: Magdalena, L., Verdegay, J.L. (eds.), 12th Conference on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems Conference, pp. 1344-1351. (2008)
Marichal, J.L.: Aggregation operators for multicriteria decision aid. Ph.D. dissertation (1998)
Mas, M., G. Mayor, G., Torrens, J.: t-operators and uninorms on a finite totally ordered set. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 14, 909–922 (1999)
Randell, D.A, Zhan Cui, Z., Cohn, A.G.: A spatial logic based on regions and connection. In: Nebel, B., Rich, C., Swartout, W.R. (eds.), 3rd International Conference of Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 165-176. Morgan Kaufmann, (1992)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kaci, S. (2011). Preferences Aggregation. In: Working with Preferences: Less Is More. Cognitive Technologies. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17280-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17280-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-17279-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-17280-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)