Parametric Estimation of Risk Neutral Density Functions

Chapter
Part of the Springer Handbooks of Computational Statistics book series (SHCS)

Abstract

This chapter deals with the estimation of risk neutral distributions for pricing index options resulting from the hypothesis of the risk neutral valuation principle. After justifying this hypothesis, we shall focus on parametric estimation methods for the risk neutral density functions determining the risk neutral distributions. We we shall differentiate between the direct and the indirect way. Following the direct way, parameter vectors are estimated which characterize the distributions from selected statistical families to model the risk neutral distributions. The idea of the indirect approach is to calibrate characteristic parameter vectors for stochastic models of the asset price processes, and then to extract the risk neutral density function via Fourier methods. For every of the reviewed methods the calculation of option prices under hypothetically true risk neutral distributions is a building block. We shall give explicit formula for call and put prices w.r.t. reviewed parametric statistical families used for direct estimation. Additionally, we shall introduce the Fast Fourier Transform method of call option pricing developed in Carr and Madan [J. Comput. Finance 2(4):61–73, 1999]. It is intended to compare the reviewed estimation methods empirically.

References

  1. Andersen, L., & Andreasen, J. (2000). Jump-diffusion models: Volatility smile fitting and numerical methods for pricing. Review of Derivatives Research, 4(3), 231–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bahra, B. (1997). Implied risk-neutral probability density functions from option prices. Working paper, Bank of England.Google Scholar
  3. Bates, D. S. (1996). Jumps and stochastic volatility: Exchange rate processes implicit in deutsche mark options. Review of Financial Studies, 9(1), 69–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biagini, S., & Cont, R. (2006). Model-free representation of pricing rules as conditional expectations. In J. Akahori, S. Ogawa, & S. Watanabe (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Ritsumeikan International Symposium – Stochastic Processes and Applications to Mathematical Finance (pp. 53–66). Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
  5. Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 637–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carr, P., & Madan, D. (1999). Option valuation using the fast fourier transform. Journal of Computational Finance, 2(4), 61–73.Google Scholar
  7. Cizek, P., Härdle, W., & Weron, R. (2005). Statistical tools in finance and insurance. Berlin: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  8. Cont, R., & Tankov, P. (2004). Financial modelling with jump processes. London: Chapman & Hall.MATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Corrado, C., & Su, T. (1997). Implied volatility skew and stock index skewness and kurtosis implied by s& p 500 index option prices. Journal of Derivatives, 4, 8–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Delbaen, F., & Schachermayer, M. (2006). Mathematics of arbitrage. Berlin: Springer.MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Dudley, R. M. (2002). Real analysis and probability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Fabozzi, F. J., Tunaru, R., & Albotas, G. (2009). Estimating risk-neutral density with parametric models in interest rate markets. Quantitative Finance, 9(1), 55–70.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Fengler, M. (2005). Semiparametric modeling of implied volatility, Springer FinanceGoogle Scholar
  14. Föllmer, H., & Schied, A. (2004). Stochastic finance (2nd ed.). Berlin: de GruyterGoogle Scholar
  15. Heston, S. (1993). A closed-form solution for options with stochastic volatility with applications to bond and currency options. Review of Financial Studies, 6(2), 327–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hugonnier, J., Kramkov, D., & Schachermayer, W. (2005). On utility-based pricing of contingent claims in complete markets. Mathematical Finance, 15(2), 203–212.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Jackwerth, J. (2000). Recovering risk aversion from option prices and realized returns. Review of Financial Studies, 1(2), 433–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jondeau, E., & Rockinger, M. (2000). Reading the smile: The message conveyed by methods which infer risk neutral densities. Journal of International Money and Finance, 19, 885–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lee, R. (2004). Option pricing by transform methods: extensions, unifications and error control. Journal of Computational Finance, 7(3), 51–86.Google Scholar
  20. Melick, W., & Thomas, C. (1997). Recovering an asset’s implied pdf from option prices: An application to crude oil crisis. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 32, 91–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Merton, R. (1976). Option pricing when underlying stock returns are discontinuous. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 125–183.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. Ritchey, R. J. (1990). Call option valuation for discrete normal mixtures. Journal of Financial Research, 13(4), 285–295.Google Scholar
  23. Rudin, W. (1974). Real and complex analysis (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.MATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Savickas, R. (2002). A simple option-pricing formula. The Financial Review, 37, 207–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Savickas, R. (2005). Evidence on delta hedging and implied volatilities for black-scholes, gamma and weibull option-pricing models. Journal of Financial Research, 28, 299–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Söderlind, P., & Swensson, L. (1997). New techniques to extract market expectation from financial instruments. Journal of Monetary Economics, 40, 383–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Walker, J. S. (1996). Fast fourier transforms. Boca Raton: CRC Press.MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ladislaus von Bortkiewicz Chair of StatisticsHumboldt-Universität zu BerlinBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Weierstrass Institute of Applied Analysis and StochasticsBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations