Empirical Analysis of Impacts of Instance-Driven Changes in Ontologies

  • Yalemisew M. Abgaz
  • Muhammad Javed
  • Claus Pahl
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6428)

Abstract

Changes in the characterization of instances in digital content are one of the rationales to evolve ontologies that support a domain. These changes can have impacts on one or more of interrelated ontologies. Before implementing changes, their impact on the target ontology, other dependent ontologies or dependent systems should be analysed. We investigate three concerns for the determination of impacts of changes in ontologies: representation of changes to ensure minimum impact, impact determination and integrity determination. Key elements of our solution are the operationalization of changes to minimize impacts, a parameterization approach for the determination of impacts, a categorization scheme for identified impacts, and prioritization technique for change operations based on the severity of impacts.

Keywords

ontology evolution impact determination instance-driven change 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Stojanovic, L.: Methods and tools for ontology evolution. PhD thesis, University of Karlsruhe (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maedche, A., Motik, B., Stojanovic, L., Studer, R., Volz, R.: Ontologies for enterprise knowledge management. IEEE Intelligent Systems 18 (2), 22–33 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stojanovic, N., Stojanovic, L., Handschuh, S.: Evolution in the ontology-based knowledge management systems. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems - ECIS 2002, Gdan̈sk, Poland (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benjamins, V., Contreras, J., Corcho, O., Gomez-perez, A.: six challenges for the semantic web. In: Cristani, Med: KR2002 Workshop on the Semantic Web, Toulouse, France (2002)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Uren, V., Cimiano, P., Iria, J., Handschuh, S., Vargas-Vera, M., Motta, E., Ciravegna, F.: Semantic annotation for knowledge management:requirements and survey of the state of the art. In: Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on World Wide Web, vol. 4 (1), pp. 14–28 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boyce, S., Pahl, C.: The development of subject domain ontologies for educational technology systems. IEEE Journal of Educational Technology and Society (ETS) 10(3), 275–288 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stojanovic, L., Maedche, A., Motik, B., Stojanovic, N.: User-driven ontology evolution management. Matrix Eigensystem Routines - EISPACK Guide 6(4), 285–300 (2002)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Qin, L., Atluri, V.: Evaluating the validity of data instances against ontology evolution over the semantic web. Information and Software Technology. 51 (1), 83–97 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liang, Y., Alani, H., Shadbolt, N.: Ontology change management in protégé. In: Proceedings AKT DTA Colloquium (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gruhn, V., Pahl, C., Wever, M.: Data model evolution as a basis of business process management, pp. 270–281. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    W3C: Owl web ontology language guide, w3c recommendation (February 10, 2004), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide
  12. 12.
    Plessers, P., De Troyer, O., Casteleyn, S.: Understanding ontology evolution: A change detection approach. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web. 5 (1), 39–49 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Javed, M., Abgaz, Y., Pahl, C.: A pattern-based framework of change operators for ontology evolution. In: Meersman, R., Herrero, P., Dillon, T. (eds.) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems OTM 2009 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 5872, pp. 544–553. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stojanovic, L., Maedche, A., Stojanovic, N., Studer, R.: Ontology evolution as reconfiguration-design problem solving. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Knowledge capture (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Oliver, D.E., Shahar, Y., Shortliffe, E.H., Musen, M.: Representation of change in controlled medical terminologies. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 15 (1), 53–76 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Haase, P., Stojanovic, L.: Consistent evolution of owl ontologies. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Euzenat, J. (eds.) ESWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3532, pp. 182–197. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Holohan, E., McMullen, D., Melia, M., Pahl, C.: Adaptive courseware generation based on semantic web technologies. In: Proceeding of the International Workshop on Applications of Semantic Web Technologies for E-Learning (SW-EL2005) at the Twelveth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED2005). IOS Press (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yalemisew M. Abgaz
    • 1
  • Muhammad Javed
    • 1
  • Claus Pahl
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Next Generation Localization (CNGL), School of ComputingDublin City UniversityDublin 9Ireland

Personalised recommendations