Skip to main content

Loop Invariant Synthesis in a Combined Domain

  • Conference paper
Formal Methods and Software Engineering (ICFEM 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 6447))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Automated verification of memory safety and functional correctness for heap-manipulating programs has been a challenging task, especially when dealing with complex data structures with strong invariants involving both shape and numerical properties. Existing verification systems usually rely on users to supply annotations, which can be tedious and error-prone and can significantly restrict the scalability of the verification system. In this paper, we reduce the need of user annotations by automatically inferring loop invariants over an abstract domain with both separation and numerical information. Our loop invariant synthesis is conducted automatically by a fixpoint iteration process, equipped with newly designed abstraction mechanism, and join and widening operators. Initial experiments have confirmed that we can synthesise loop invariants with non-trivial constraints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berdine, J., Calcagno, C., O’Hearn, P.: Smallfoot: Modular automatic assertion checking with separation logic. In: de Boer, F.S., Bonsangue, M.M., Graf, S., de Roever, W.-P. (eds.) FMCO 2005. LNCS, vol. 4111, pp. 115–137. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Berdine, J., Cook, B., Distefano, D., O’Hearn, P.: Automatic termination proofs for programs with shape-shifting heaps. In: Ball, T., Jones, R.B. (eds.) CAV 2006. LNCS, vol. 4144, pp. 386–400. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Calcagno, C., Distefano, D., O’Hearn, P., Yang, H.: Compositional shape analysis by means of bi-abduction. In: 36th POPL (January 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chang, B., Rival, X.: Relational inductive shape analysis. In: POPL (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chin, W.-N., David, C., Nguyen, H.H., Qin, S.: Automated verification of shape, size and bag properties. In: 12th ICECCS (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chin, W.-N., David, C., Nguyen, H.H., Qin, S.: Enhancing modular oo verification with separation logic. In: POPL (January 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cousot, P., Cousot, R.: Abstract interpretation: a unified lattice model for static analysis of programs by construction or approximation of fixpoints. In: POPL (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cousot, P., Cousot, R.: On abstraction in software verification. In: Brinksma, E., Larsen, K.G. (eds.) CAV 2002. LNCS, vol. 2404, p. 37. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Distefano, D., O’Hearn, P., Yang, H.: A local shape analysis based on separation logic. In: Hermanns, H., Palsberg, J. (eds.) TACAS 2006. LNCS, vol. 3920, pp. 459–473. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Gotsman, A., Berdine, J., Cook, B.: Interprocedural shape analysis with separated heap abstractions. In: Yi, K. (ed.) SAS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4134, pp. 240–260. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Gulwani, S., Lev-Ami, T., Sagiv, M.: A Combination Framework for Tracking Partition Sizes. In: POPL (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Guo, B., Vachharajani, N., August, D.: Shape analysis with inductive recursion synthesis. In: PLDI (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hackett, B., Rugina, R.: Region-based shape analysis with tracked locations. In: POPL (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ishtiaq, S., O’Hearn, P.: BI as an assertion language for mutable data structures. In: POPL (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kovács, L., Jebelean, T.: An algorithm for automated generation of invariants for loops with conditionals. In: SYNASC (Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kuncak, V., Lam, P., Rinard, M.: Role analysis. In: POPL (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Leino, K.R.M., Logozzo, F.: Loop invariants on demand. In: Yi, K. (ed.) APLAS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3780, pp. 119–134. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Leino, K.R.M.: Dafny: an automatic program verifier for functional correctness. To appear at LPAR-16 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Magill, S., Tsai, M., Lee, P., Tsay, Y.: Thor: A tool for reasoning about shape and arithmetic. In: Gupta, A., Malik, S. (eds.) CAV 2008. LNCS, vol. 5123, pp. 428–432. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Nguyen, H.H., Chin, W.-N.: Enhancing program verification with lemmas. In: Gupta, A., Malik, S. (eds.) CAV 2008. LNCS, vol. 5123, pp. 355–369. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Nguyen, H.H., David, C., Qin, S., Chin, W.-N.: Automated verification of shape and size properties via separation logic. In: Cook, B., Podelski, A. (eds.) VMCAI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4349, pp. 251–266. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Parkinson, M., Bierman, G.: Separation logic, abstraction and inheritance. In: POPL (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Popeea, C., Chin, W.-N.: Inferring disjunctive postconditions. In: Okada, M., Satoh, I. (eds.) ASIAN 2006. LNCS, vol. 4435, pp. 331–345. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Pugh, P.: The Omega Test: a fast and practical integer programming algorithm for dependence analysis. Communications of the ACM (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Reynolds, J.: Separation logic: a logic for shared mutable data structures. In: 17th LICS (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sagiv, M., Reps, T., Wilhelm, R.: Parametric shape analysis via 3-valued logic. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems 24(3), 217–298 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang, H., Lee, O., Berdine, J., Calcagno, C., Cook, B., Distefano, D., O’Hearn, P.: Scalable shape analysis for systems code. In: Gupta, A., Malik, S. (eds.) CAV 2008. LNCS, vol. 5123, pp. 385–398. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Qin, S., He, G., Luo, C., Chin, WN. (2010). Loop Invariant Synthesis in a Combined Domain. In: Dong, J.S., Zhu, H. (eds) Formal Methods and Software Engineering. ICFEM 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6447. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16901-4_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16901-4_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16900-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16901-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics