Preservation of Intelligibility of Digital Objects



We live in a digital world. Everyone nowadays works and communicates using computers. We communicate digitally using e-mails and voice platforms, watch photographs in digital form, use computers for complex computations and experiments. Moreover information that previously existed in analogue form (i.e. in paper) is now digitized. The amount of digital objects that libraries and archives maintain constantly increases. It is therefore urgent to ensure that these digital objects will remain functional, usable and intelligible in the future. But what should we preserve and how? To address this question we first summarise the discussion in previous Chapters about what a digital object is.


Digital Object Dependency Graph Dependency Type Community Knowledge Text Editor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 108.
    The UVC: a method for preserving digital documents, proof of concept. Available from
  2. 109.
    Digital Asset Preservation Tools – based on UVC –
  3. 110.
    Java Virtual Machine Specification
  4. 111.
    Knight G (2008) Framework for the definition of significant properties. Available from
  5. 115.
  6. 116.
    Investigating the Significant Properties of Electronic Content over time (InSPECT)
  7. 117.
    The InterPARES project,
  8. 118.
    Wilson A (2008) Significant Properties of Digital Objects. Presented at “What to preserve? Significant Properties of Digital Objects”. Available from
  9. 119.
    DELOS Digital Preservation Testbed. Retrieved from .html
  10. 121.
    Sergeant D (2002) Interpretation of the OAIS Model. Available from
  11. 122.
  12. 123.
    Factor M, Naor D, Rabinovici-Cohen S, Ramati L, Reshef P, Satran J (2007) The Need for Preservation Aware Storage – A Position Paper. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review. Special Issue on File and Storage Systems, 41(1): pages 19–23, (Jan 2007).Google Scholar
  13. 124.
    Factor M, Naor D, Rabinovici-Cohen S, Ramati L, Reshef P, Ronen S, Satran J, Giaretta D (2008) Preservation DataStores: New storage paradigm for preservation environments. IBM Journal of Research and Development on Storage Technologies and Systems, 52, Number 4/5) .Google Scholar
  14. 125.
  15. 126.
    Factor M, Naor D, Rabinovici-Cohen S, Ramati L, Reshef P, Satran J, Giaretta D (2007) Preservation DataStores: Architecture for Preservation Aware Storage. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Mass Storage Systems and Technologies (MSST), September 24–27, 2007, San Diego, USA.Google Scholar
  16. 127.
    International Committee for Information Technology Standards (formerly NCITS), SCSI Object-Based Storage Device Commands (OSD). Document Number: ANSI/INCITS 400-2004.Google Scholar
  17. 128.
    Factor M, Meth K, Naor D, Rodeh O, Satran J (2005) Object storage: The future building block for storage systems – a position paper. Paper presented at Local to Global Data Interoperability – Challenges and Technologies, Sardinia ItalyGoogle Scholar
  18. 129.
    Dunckley M, Ronen S, Henis E, Rabinovici-Cohen S, Reshef P, Giaretta D, Conway E (2010) Using XFDU for CASPAR Information Packaging. Accepted to OCLC Systems & Services: International Digital Library Perspectives.Google Scholar
  19. 250.
    Dale R (2007) Mapping of Audit & Certification Criteria for CRL Meeting (15-16 January 2007). Available from -Nestor-DCC-criteria_mapping.doc

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.STFC and Alliance for Permanent AccessYetminster, DorsetUK

Personalised recommendations