Advertisement

Advanced Preservation Analysis

  • David GiarettaEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

So far we have used the OAIS terminology for digital preservation . Now we turn to a complementary way of looking at it. We can say that the challenge of digital preservation of scientific data lies in the need to preserve not only the dataset itself but also the ability it has to deliver knowledge to a future user community. This entails allowing future users to reanalyze the data within new contexts. Thus, in order to carry out meaningful preservation we need to ensure that future users are equipped with the necessary information to re-use the data.

Keywords

Information Object Future User Preservation Strategy Preservation Solution Rutherford Appleton Laboratory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    PARSE. Insight project http://www.parse-insight.eu
  2. 2.
    CASPAR (Cultural, Artistic and Scientific knowledge for Preservation, Access and Retrieval) project, part funded by the EU under contract 033572. Web site http://www.casparpreserves.eu
  3. 166.
  4. 167.
    Ng K (ed) (2006) Proceedings of the COST287-ConGAS 2nd International Symposium on Gesture Interface for Multimedia Systems (GIMS2006), 9-10 May 2006, Leeds, UK. Available from http://www.i-maestro.org/documenti/view_documenti.php?doc_id=1052
  5. 168.
    Ng K, Nasi P (eds) (2008) Interactive Multimedia Music Technologies IGI Global, Information Science Reference, Library of Congress 2007023452, 2008.Google Scholar
  6. 169.
    Young D, Nunn P, Vassiliev A.(2006) Composing for Hyperbow: A Collaboration between MIT and the Royal Academy of Music. In: Proceeding of the New Interfaces for Musical Expression International Conference (NIME). Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  7. 170.
    Overholt D (2005) The Overtone Violin. In: Proceeding of the International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. Vancouver, BC, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  8. 171.
    Lévy B, Ng K (2008) Audio-driven Augmentations for the Cello. In: Proceeding of the 4th i-Maestro Workshop on Technology-Enhanced Music Education, co-located with the 8th International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME 2008), Genova, Italy, ISBN: 978 0 85316 269 8, pages. 15–20, 4 June 2008Google Scholar
  9. 172.
  10. 173.
    Ng K (2004) Music via Motion: Transdomain Mapping of Motion and Sound for Interactive Performances. In: Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 92, 2004.Google Scholar
  11. 174.
    Nagashima Y (2003) Bio-Sensing Systems and Bio-Feedback Systems for Interactive Media Arts. In: Proceeding of the New Interfaces for Musical Expression Inter-national Conference (NIME-03). Montreal, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  12. 175.
    Ng K, Weyde T, Larkin O, Neubarth K, Koerselman T, Ong B (2007) 3D Augmented Mirror: A Multimodal Interface for String In-strument Learning and Teaching with Gesture Support. In: Proceeding of the 9th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, Nagoya, Japan, pages. 339–345, ISBN: 978-1-59593-817-6, ACM, SIGCHI, DOI: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1322192.1322252
  13. 176.
    Ng K, Ong B, Weyde T, Neubarth K (2008) Interactive Multimedia Technology-Enhanced Learning for Music with i-Maestro. In: Proceeding of ED-MEDIA 2008 World Conference on Education Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications, Vienna, Austria, 30 June – 4 July 2008.Google Scholar
  14. 177.
    Ng K (ed) (2008) Proceedings of the 4th i-Maestro Workshop on Technology-Enhanced Music Education, co-located with the 8th International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression (NIME 2008), Genova, Italy, ISBN: 978 0 85316 269 8, 4 June 2008. Available from http://www.i-maestro.org/workshop/
  15. 178.
    Bradshaw D, Ng K (2008) Tracking Conductors Hand Movements Using Multiple Wiimotes. In: Proceeding of the International Conference on Automated Solutions for Cross Media Content and Multi-channel Distribution (AXMEDIS 2008), Florence, Italy, pages. 93–99, Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/AXMEDIS.2008.40, IEEE Computer Society Press, ISBN: 978-0-7695-3406-0. 4. 17–19 Nov. 2008.Google Scholar
  16. 179.
    Bradshaw D, Ng K (2008). Analyzing a Conductor’s Gestures with the Wii-mote. In: Proceeding of EVA London 2008: the International Conference of Electronic Visualisation and the Arts, British Computer Society, 5 Southampton Street, London WC2E 7HA, UK, 22-24 July 2008.Google Scholar
  17. 180.
    Ng K, Pham TV, Ong B, Mikroyannidis A, Giaretta D (2008) Preservation of interactive multimedia performances, International Journal of Metadata Semanticssemantics and Ontologies, 3(3) 183–196. doiDOI: 10.1504/IJMSO.2008.023567. 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 181.
    Ng K, Mikroyannidis A, Ong B, Bonardi A, Barthélemy J, Ciavarella R, Boutard G (2008) Ontology Management for Preservation of Interactive Multimedia Performances. In: Proceeding of the International Computer Music Conference (ICMC), Belfast, 24–29 August 2008.Google Scholar
  19. 182.
    Gill T (2004) Building semantic bridges between museums, libraries and archives: The CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model. First Monday, 9Google Scholar
  20. 183.
    Doerr M (2003) The CIDOC CRM – an Ontological Approach to Semantic Interoperability of metadata. AI Magazine, 24Google Scholar
  21. 184.
    FRBR. Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records – Final Report (1997) Frankfurt am Main, Germany, International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.STFC and Alliance for Permanent AccessYetminster, DorsetUK

Personalised recommendations