The Practice of Competence Modelling

  • Thomas Albertsen
  • Kurt Sandkuhl
  • Ulf Seigerroth
  • Vladimir Tarasov
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 68)

Abstract

A clear understanding of the organizational competences of an enterprise and the underlying individual competences and the competence development needs has become more and more important for many industrial areas as a foundation for competence supply processes and adjustment to changing market conditions. Competence modelling, i.e. the use of enterprise modelling techniques for capturing existing and describing desired organisational and individual competences in enterprises, offers important contributions to this. In the last years, the authors of the paper have performed a number of competence modelling cases, which revealed different characteristics and resulted in lessons learned. This paper presents an examination of different characteristics of competence modelling cases, and recommendations and lessons learned from these cases for the practice of competence modelling.

Keywords

Enterprise Modelling Competence Modelling 

References

  1. 1.
    Tapscott, D., Ticoll, D., Lowy, A.: Digital Capital. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2000)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coi, J.L.D., et al.: A Model For Competence Gap Analysis ∗. Work (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cheetham, G., Chivers, G.E.: Professions, Competence and Informal Learning. Edgard Elgar Publishing Limited (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    HR-XML. HR-XML Measurable Competencies, http://www.hr-xml.org (cited 2009)
  5. 5.
    RCD, I.: IEEE Standard for Learning Technology—Data Model for Reusable Competency Definitions (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    SRCM: Proposed Draft Standard for Learning Technology — Simple Reusable Competency Map (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Committee, L.T.S.: Proposed Draft Standard for Learning Technology — Simple Reusable Competency Map (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berio, G., Harzallah, M.: Towards an integrating architecture for competence management. Computers in Industry 58, 199–209 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pepiot, G., et al.: A fuzzy approach for the evaluation of competences. International Journal of Production Economics 112, 336–353 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sure, Y., Maedche, A., Staab, S.: Leveraging Corporate Skill Knowledge — From ProPer to OntoProPer 1 Introduction 2 Architecture of our case study. Architecture: 1-12Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pepiot, G., et al.: UECML: Unified Enterprise Competence Modelling Language. Computers in Industry 58, 130–142 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Johnsen, S., et al.: Model-based Adaptive Product and Process Engineering. In: Rabe, M., Mihók, P. (eds.) New Technologies for the Intelligent Design and Operation of Manufacturing Networks, Fraunhofer IRB Verlag, Stuttgart (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sandkuhl, K., Lillehagen, F.: The Early Phases of Enterprise Knowledge Modeling: Practices and Experiences from Scaffolding and Scoping. In: IFIP PoEM 2008. LNBIP, Springer, Stockholm (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tarassov, V., Sandkuhl, K., Henoch, B.: Using ontologies for representation of individual and enterprise competence models. In: Bellot, P., Duong, V., Bui, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE International Conference on Computer Sciences Research, Innovation and Vision for the Future, RIVF 2006, pp. 205–212. IEEE, Ho-Chi-Minh City (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tarasov, V., Lundqvist, M.: Modeling collaborative design competence with ontologies. International Journal of e-Collaboration: Special Issue on the State of the Art and Future Challenges on Collaborative Design 3(4), 46–62 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Albertsen
    • 1
  • Kurt Sandkuhl
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ulf Seigerroth
    • 1
  • Vladimir Tarasov
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EngineeringJönköping UniversityJönköpingSweden
  2. 2.Institute of Computer ScienceRostock UniversityRostockGermany

Personalised recommendations