Patient Care across Health Care Institutions: An Enterprise Modelling Approach

  • Sobah Abbas Petersen
  • Grete Bach
  • Astrid Brevik Svarlein
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 68)

Abstract

This paper presents a modelling exercise conducted in the health sector, to identify functional requirements for Electronic Patient Records. The model is based on a holistic modelling approach, Active Knowledge Modelling and is conducted by a multi-disciplinary team with domain and modelling experiences. The main aim of the paper is to share our experience and to highlight the advantages from a holistic approach to modelling. The paper describes the needs of the stakeholders that drove the modelling activity and the design decisions that influenced the model. The model supported a common understanding among the model creators and the data providers. In addition, it helped identify new requirements for Electronic Patient Records that will enable better continuity in care in the health sector.

Keywords

Enterprise Modelling Active Knowledge Modelling Model Design Health Information Systems Electronic Patient Records 

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Benson, T.: Principles of Health Interoperability HL7 and SNOMED - The Book. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    European Interoperability Framework for Pan-European eGovernment Services, Version 1.0 (2004), http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/servlets/Doc?id=19529
  4. 4.
    Gao, S., Krogstie, J.: A Combined Framework for Development of Business Process Support Systems. In: Persson, A., Stirna, J. (eds.) The Practice of Enterprise Modeling, PoEM 2009, pp. 115–129. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vernadat, F.: Enterprise Modeling and Integration: Principles and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fox, M.S., Gruninger, M.: Enterprise Modelling. AI Magazine, 109–121 (Fall 1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    OMG: UML Resource Page, http://www.uml.org/
  8. 8.
    Jørgensen, H.D.: Enterprise Modeling - What we have learned and what we have not. In: Persson, A., Stirna, J. (eds.) The Practice of Enterperise Modeling, PoEM 2009, pp. 3–7. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    OMG: BPMN Information Homepage, http://www.bpmn.org/
  10. 10.
    Lilleagen, F., Krogstie, J.: Active Knowledge Modelling for Enterprises. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Horkoff, J., Yu, E.: Evaluating Goal Achievement in Enterprise Modelling - An Interactive Procedure and Experiences. In: Persson, A., Stirna, J. (eds.) The Practice of Enterperise Modeling, PoEM 2009. LNBIP, vol. 39, pp. 145–160. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shahzad, K., Zdravkovic, J.: A Goal-Oriented Approach for Business Process Improvement Using Process Warehouse Data. In: Persson, A., Stirna, J. (eds.) The Practice of Enterperise Modeling, PoEM 2009, pp. 84–98. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Staccini, P., et al.: Modelling Health Care Processes for Eliciting User Requirements: a way to link a quality paradigm and clinical information system design. International Journal of Medical Informatics 64, 129–142 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Staccini, P., et al.: Mapping Care Processes within a Hospital: from theory to a web-based proposal merging enterprise modelling and ISO normative principles. International Journal of Medical Informatics 74, 335–344 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jun, G.T., et al.: Health care process modelling: which method when? International Journal for Quality in Health Care 21(3), 214–224 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
    Weitzenegger, K.: How to run an Evaluation Café?, http://www.weitzenegger.de/cafe/index.htm

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sobah Abbas Petersen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Grete Bach
    • 1
  • Astrid Brevik Svarlein
    • 1
  1. 1.KITH ASNorway
  2. 2.Dept. of Computer and Information SciencesNorwegian University of Science & TechnologyNorway

Personalised recommendations