Advertisement

Towards Defining a Competence Profile for the Enterprise Modeling Practitioner

  • Anne Persson
  • Janis Stirna
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 68)

Abstract

Enterprise Modeling (EM) has established itself as a valuable instrument for various purposes related to organizational development, such as designing or redesigning the business, eliciting requirements for information systems, capturing and reasoning about organizational knowledge. A notable characteristic of EM is its collaborative way of stakeholder involvement in modeling. Much of the success of projects using EM depends on how the EM process is organized and on the competence level of the expert responsible for the EM approach. This paper analyses what are the competence needs for the method expert and what competences are needed in the different steps in the EM process. The EM process described consists of activities for project inception and planning, conducting modeling sessions, and delivering a result that can be taken up by a subsequent implementation project. Two main competence areas are discussed in relation to the EM process – competences related to modeling and competences related to managing EM projects.

Keywords

Enterprise modeling modeling practitioner competence profile 

References

  1. 1.
    Persson, A., Stirna, J.: An explorative study into the influence of business goals on the practical use of Enterprise Modelling methods and tools. In: Tenth International Conference on Information Systems Development (ISD 2001), September 5-7, University of London Royal Holloway (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bajec, M., Krisper, M.: A methodology and tool support for managing business rules in organizations. Information Systems 30(6), 423–443 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Castro, J., Kolp, M., Mylopoulos, J.: A Requirements-Driven Software Development Methodology. In: Dittrich, K.R., Geppert, A., Norrie, M.C. (eds.) CAiSE 2001. LNCS, vol. 2068, pp. 108–123. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dobson, J., Blyth, J., Strens, R.: Organisational Requirements Definition for Information Technology. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Requirements Engineering 1994, Denver/CO (1994)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Johannesson, P., Boman, M., Bubenko, J., Wangler, B.: Conceptual Modelling. Prentice Hall International Series in Computer Science. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1997)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bubenko Jr., J.A.: Extending the Scope of Information Modelling. In: Fourth International Workshop on the Deductive Approach to Information Systems and Databases, Lloret, Costa Brava Catalonia, September 20-22 Department de Llenguatges i Sistemes Informatics, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Report de Recerca LSI/93-25, Barcelona (1993)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bubenko Jr., J.A., Persson, A., Stirna, J.: User Guide of the Knowledge Management Approach Using Enterprise Knowledge Patterns. In: Deliverable D3, IST Programme project Hypermedia and Pattern Based Knowledge Management for Smart Organisations, project no. IST-2000-28401, Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden (2001)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    F3 Consortium, F3 Reference Manual. ESPRIT III Project 6612, SISU, Stockholm (1994)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fox, M.S., Chionglo, J.F., Fadel, F.G.: A common-sense model of the enterprise. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Industrial Engineering Research Conference, Institute for Industrial Engineers, Norcross,GA (1993)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lillehagen, F., Krogstie, J.: Active Knowledge Modeling of Enterprises. Springer, Heidelberg (2008) ISBN: 978-3-540-79415-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Loucopoulos, P., Kavakli, V., Prekas, N., Rolland, C., Grosz, G., Nurcan, S.: Using the EKD Approach: The Modelling Component, UMIST, Manchester, UK (1997)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yu, E.S.K., Mylopoulos, J.: From E-R to ”A-R-” Modelling Strategic Actor Relationships for Business Process Reengineering. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on the Entity-Relationship Approach, Manchester, England (1994)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wangler, B., Persson, A., Johannesson, P., Ekenberg, L.: Bridging High-level Enterprise Models to Implemenation-Oriented Models. In: Fujita, H., Johannesson, P. (eds.) New Trends in Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Niehaves, B., Stirna, J.: Participative Enterprise Modelling for Balanced Scorecard Implementation. In: 14th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2006), Gothberg, Sweden (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stirna, J., Persson, A., Aggestam, L.: Building Knowledge Repositories with Enterprise Modelling and Patterns - from Theory to Practice. In: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS 2006), Gothenburg, Sweden (June 2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wangler, B., Persson, A.: Capturing Collective Intentionality in Software Development. In: Fujita, H., Johannesson, P. (eds.) New Trends in Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques, pp. 262–270. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wangler, B., Persson, A., Söderström, E.: Enterprise Modeling for B2B integration. In: CD-ROM proceedings International Conference on Advances in Infrastructure for Electronic Business, Science, and Education on the Internet, , L’Aquila, Italy, August 6-12 (2001)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gustas, R., Bubenko Jr., J.A., Wangler, B.: Goal Driven Enterprise Modelling: Bridging Pragmatic and Semantic Descriptions of Information Systems. In: 5th European - Japanese Seminar on Information Modelling and Knowledge Bases, Sapphoro, May 30-June 3 (1995)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kardasis, P., Loucopoulos, P., Scott, B., Filippidou, D., Clarke, R., Wangler, B., Xini, G.: The use of Business Knowledge Modelling for Knowledge Discovery in the Banking Sector. In: IMACS-CSC 1998, Athens, Greece (October 1998)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Carstensen, A., Holmberg, L., Sandkuhl, K.: Supporting Collaboration in an Extended Enterprise with the Connector View on Enterprise Models. In: Proc. of PoEM 2008. LNBIP, vol. 15, pp. 111–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nilsson, A.G., Tolis, C., Nellborn, C. (eds.): Perspectives on Business Modelling: Understanding and Changing Organisations. Springer, Heidelberg (1999) ISBN 978-3540652496Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Persson, A.: Enterprise Modelling in Practice: Situational Factors and their Influence on Adopting a Participative Approach. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, ISSN 1101-8526 (2001)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–105 (2004)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stirna, J.: The Influence of Intentional and Situational Factors on EM Tool Acquisition in Organisations. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Royal Institute of Technology and Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden (2001)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Stirna, J., Persson, A.: An Enterprise Modeling Approach to Support Creativity and Quality in Information Systems and Business Development. In: Halpin, T., Krogstie, J., Proper, E. (eds.) Innovations in Information Systems Modeling: Methods and Best Practices, IGI Global (December 2008),ISBN 978-1-60566-278-7 http://www.igi-global.com/reference/details.asp?ID=33232
  26. 26.
    Bergenheim, A., Persson, A., Brash, D., Bubenko, J.A.J., Burman, P., Nellborn, C., Stirna, J.: CAROLUS-System Design Specification for Vattenfall, Vattenfall AB, Stockholm, Sweden (1998)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mikelsons, J., Stirna, J., Kalnins, J.R., Kapenieks, A., Kazakovs, M., Vanaga, I., Sinka, A., Persson, A., Kaindl, H.: Trial Application in the Riga City Council, deliverable D6, project no. IST-2000-28401 Hypermedia and Pattern Based Knowledge Management for Smart Organizations, Riga, Latvia (2002)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dulle, H.: Trial Application in Verbundplan, deliverable D5, IST Programme project IST-2000-28401 Hypermedia and Pattern Based Knowledge Management for Smart Organizations, Verbundplan, Austria (2002)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stirna, J., Persson, A., Sandkuhl, K.: Participative Enterprise Modelling: Experiences and Recommendations. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L., Sindre, G. (eds.) CAiSE 2007 and WES 2007. LNCS, vol. 4495, pp. 546–560. Springer, Heidelberg (2007) ISBN 978 -3-540-72987-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sandkuhl, K., Lillehagen, F.M.: The Early Phases of Enterprise Knowledge Modelling: Practices and Experiences from Scaffolding and Scoping. In: Proc. of PoEM 2008. LNBIP, vol. 15, pp. 1–14. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lundqvist, M., Holmquist, E., Sandkuhl, K., Seigerroth, U., Strandesjö, J.: Information Demand Context Modelling for Improved Information Flow: Experiences and Practices. In: Poc. of PoEM 2009. LNBIP, vol. 39, Springer, Heidelberg (2009) ISBN 978-3-642-05351-1Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rittel, H.W.J., Webber, M.M. (eds.): Planning Problems are Wicked Problems, Developments in Design Methodology, Cross. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1984)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jørgensen, H.D.: Enterprise Modeling - What We Have Learned, and What We Have Not. In: Proc. of PoEM 2009. LNBIP, vol. 39, pp. 3–7. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stirna, J., Persson, A.: Anti-patterns as a Means of Focusing on Critical Quality Aspects in Enterprise Modeling. In: Proc. of BMMDS/EMMSAD 2009. LNBIP, vol. 29, pp. 407–418. Springer, Heidelberg (2009) ISBN 978-3-642-01861-9Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Willars, H.: Business Modeller’s Checklist: “Dos” and “Don’ts” in Hands-on Practice. In: Nilsson, A.G., Tolis, C., Nellborn, C. (eds.) Perspectives on Business Modelling: Understanding and Changing Organisations, Springer, Heidelberg (1999)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lindström, C.-G.: Lesson Learned from Applying Business Modelling: Exploring Opportunities and Avoiding Pitfalls. In: Nilsson, A.G., Tolis, C., Nellborn, C. (eds.) Perspectives on Business Modelling: Understanding and Changing Organisations, Springer, Heidelberg (1999)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zavala, A., Hass, B.H.: The Art and Power of Facilitation: Running Powerful Meetings, Management Concepts. Inc., Vienna (2008) ISBN 9781567262124Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kaarst-Brown, M.L.: Five symbolic roles of the external consultant – Integrating change, power and symbolism. Journal of Organizational Change Management 12(6), 540–561 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne Persson
    • 1
  • Janis Stirna
    • 2
  1. 1.Informatics Research CentreUniversity of SkövdeSkövdeSweden
  2. 2.Department of Computer and Systems SciencesStockholm UniversityKistaSweden

Personalised recommendations