Advertisement

Towards a Unified Business Strategy Language: A Meta-model of Strategy Maps

  • Constantinos Giannoulis
  • Michael Petit
  • Jelena Zdravkovic
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 68)

Abstract

Alignment between business strategies and the resources engaged ensuring their realization, has been a continuous concern of enterprises of all kinds in last few decades. Commonly, enterprises fail to establish the traceability from business strategies towards operational tasks carried by employees. From the requirements engineering perspective this problem leads also to a misalignment between business and IT assets. In this study, we argue that for communicating high-level intentions and strategies down to the operational perspective, i.e. tasks and resources, the core necessity is to have a rich and well-defined language for modeling business strategies. Such a language could be further utilized for facilitating formalizations and a constructive analysis of high-level business aspects of enterprises, as well for comparing and unifying existing intentional modeling languages from the business and requirements engineering domains. As a reference proposal for formalizing business strategies, we consider the well-established strategy maps [1] from the Management Information Systems community which provide textual concepts of strategy-related notions establishing causal relationships between them. We have set an effort to formalize strategy maps in the form of a meta-model, usage scenarios and constraints, providing a systematic basis for obtaining a unified language/ontology for business strategy modeling.

Keywords

Business strategy strategy maps goal modeling meta-model 

References

  1. 1.
    Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: Strategy Maps: Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: Mastering the Management System. J. Harvard business review 86, 63–77 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    van Lamsweerde, A.: Goal-oriented requirements engineering: a guided tour. In: 5th IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, pp. 249–262. IEEE Press, New York (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yu, E.: Towards Modeling and reasoning Support for Early-Phase Requirements Engineering. In: 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE 1997), pp. 226–235. IEEE Press, Washington (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Business Rules Group (BRG): The Business Motivation Model. Group (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anaya, V., Berio, G., Harzallah, M., Heymans, P., Matulevicius, R., Opdahl, A., Panetto, H., Verdecho, M.J.: The Unified Enterprise Modelling Language – Overview and further work. J. Computers in Industry 61 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kavakli, E., Loucopoulos, P.: Goal Driven Requirements Engineering: Evaluation of Current Methods. In: 8th CAiSE/IFIP8.1 Workshop on Evaluation of Modeling Methods in Systems Analysis and Design, EMMSAD (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wilson, S.P., Kelly, T.P., McMermid, J.A.: Safety Case Development: Current Practice, Future Prospects. In: 1st ENCRESS/5th CSR Workshop (1995)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Basili, V.R., Rombach, D.D.: The TAME Project: Towards Improvement-Oriented Software Environments. J. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 14, 758–772 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Amyot, D., Ghanavati, S., Horkoff, J., Mussbacher, G., Peyton, L., Yu, E.: Evaluating goal models within the goal-oriented requirement language. J. Intelligent Systems 25, 841–877 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chung, L., Nixon, B.A., Yu, E., Mylopoulos, J.: Non-Functional Requirements in Software Engineering. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Popova, V., Sharpanskykh, A.: Formal Modelling of Goals in Organizations. Technical report, VU University faculty of Science (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Camponovo, G.: Conceptual Models for Designing Information Systems Supporting the Strategic Analysis of Technology Environments. PhD Thesis. Information Systems Institute, HEC School of Business, University of Lausanne (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barney, J.: Types of Competition and the Theory of Strategy: Toward an Integrative Framework. J. Academy of Management Review 11, 791–800 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The Balanced Scorecard: translating Strategy into Action. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1996)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bleistein, S.J., Cox, K., Verner, J.: Validating strategic alignment of organizational IT requirements using goal modeling and problem diagrams. J. Systems and Software 79, 362–378 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Thevenet, L.H., Salinesi, C.: Aligning IS to organization’s strategy: the INSTAL method. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L., Sindre, G. (eds.) CAiSE 2007 and WES 2007. LNCS, vol. 4495, pp. 203–217. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nurcan, S., Etien, A., Kaabi, R., Zoukar, I., Rolland, C.: A strategy driven business process modelling approach. J. Business Process Management 11, 628–649 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gordijn, J., Petit, M., Wieringa, R.: Understanding business strategies of networked value constellations using goal- and value modeling. In: 14th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE 2006), pp. 129–138 (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    van der Raadt, B., Gordijn, J., Yu, E.: Exploring web services ideas from a business value perspective. In: 13th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering (RE 2005), pp. 53–62. IEEE CS, Los Alamitos (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Edirisuriya, A.: Design Support for e-Commerce Information Systems using Goal, Business and Process Modelling. PhD Thesis. Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Singh, S.N., Woo, C.: Investigating business-IT alignment through multi-disciplinary goal concepts. J. Requirements Engineering 14, 177–207 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Babar, A., Zowghi, D., Chew, E.: Using Goals to Model Strategy Map for Business IT Alignment. In: 5th International Workshop on Business/IT Alignment and Interoperability (BUSITAL 2010), pp. 16–30 (2010)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: The strategy map: guide to aligning intangible assets. J. Strategy & Leadership 32, 10–17 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kaplan, R.S., Norton, D.P.: Having trouble with your strategy? Then map it. J. Harvard Business Review 78, 167–176 (2000)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Olve, N.G., Petri, C.J., Roy, J., Roy, S.: Making Scorecards Actionable: Balancing Strategy and Control. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., West Sussex (2003)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cobbold, I., Lawrie, G.: The development of the Balanced Scorecard as a strategic management tool 2GC Conference Paper. In: PMA Conference, pp. 0-9 (2002)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Harel, D., Rumpe, B.: Meaningful Modeling: What’ s the Semantics of “semantics”? J. Computer 37, 64–72 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lucena, M., Santos, E., Silva, C., Alencar, F., Silva, M.J., Castro, J.: Towards a unified metamodel for i*. In: 2nd International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS 2008), pp. 237–246 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Constantinos Giannoulis
    • 1
  • Michael Petit
    • 2
  • Jelena Zdravkovic
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer and Systems SciencesStockholm UniversityKistaSweden
  2. 2.PReCISE Research Center, Computer Science DepartmentUniversity of NamurNamurBelgium

Personalised recommendations