Indicators for Assessing Threats to Freshwater Biodiversity from Humans and Human-Shaped Landscapes

Part of the Ecological Studies book series (ECOLSTUD, volume 214)


Whereas high human population density generally indicates a stress to nearby aquatic communities, the opposite is not always true. Because freshwaters integrate disturbances from their upstream catchments and may also be affected by downstream activities via upstream–downstream connections, the location of humans and their impacts can be spatially disconnected. The latter part of this chapter focuses on threat assessments over large areas in which limited data are available. Whereas most aquatic conservation assessments have been undertaken in the data-rich temperate world, particularly in study areas covering mid- to small-size catchments, we illustrate approaches that are taken at the global, continental (Africa), and large river basin (Niger) levels, employing human population data. We conclude by discussing research priorities and the need to address key gaps in data that hinder assessment and ultimately impede managers’ abilities to mitigate threats.


  1. Abell RA, Olson DM, Dinerstein E, Hurley PT, Diggs JT, Eichbaum W, Walters S, Wettengel W, Allnutt T, Loucks CJ, Hedao P (2000) Freshwater ecoregions of North America: a conservation assessment. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. Abell R, Thieme M, Dinerstein E, Olson D (2002) A sourcebook for conducting biological assessments and developing biodiversity visions for ecoregion conservation. Volume II: Freshwater ecoregions. World Wildlife Fund-US, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Abell R, Thieme M, Revenga C, Bryer M, Kottelat M, Bogutskaya N, Coad B, Mandrak N, Contreras-Balderas S, Bussing W, Stiassny MLJ, Skelton P, Allen GR, Unmack P, Naseka A, Ng R, Sindorf N, Robertson J, Armijo E, Higgins J, Heibel TJ, Wikramanayake E, Olson D, Lopez HL, Reis RE, Lundberg JG, Sabaj Perez MH, Petry P (2008) Freshwater ecoregions of the world: a new map of biogeographic units for freshwater biodiversity conservation. Bioscience 58:403–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alcamo J, Döll P, Henrichs T, Kaspar F, Lehner B, Rösch T, Siebert S (2003) Development and testing of the water GAP 2 global model of water use and availability. Hydrol Sci J 48(3):317–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allan JD, Flecker AS (1993) Biodiversity conservation in running waters: identifying the major factors that threaten destruction of riverine species and ecosystems. Bioscience 43:32–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Allan JD, Abell R, Hogan Z, Revenga C, Taylor BW, Welcomme RL, Winemiller K (2005) Overfishing of inland waters. Bioscience 55(12):1041–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2000) Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecol Appl 10:1251–1262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boon PJ (2000) The development of integrated methods for assessing river conservation value. Hydrobiologia 422(423):413–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boulton AJ (1999) An overview of river health assessment: philosophies practice problems and prognosis. Freshw Biol 41:469–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caraco NF, Cole JJ, Likens GE, Lovett GM, Weathers KC (2003) Variation in NO3 export from flowing waters of vastly different sizes: does one model fit all? Ecosystems 6:344–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Center for International Earth Science Information Network, Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (2005) Gridded population of the world, version 3 (GPWv3): Population Grids. Socioeconomic Data and Applications Center (SEDAC) Columbia University, Palisades NY. Available at
  12. Chao NL, Prang G (1997) Project Piaba: towards a sustainable ornamental fishery in the Amazon. Aquarium Sci Conserv 1:105–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Collen B, Ram M, Dewhurst N, Clausnitzer V, Kalkman VJ, Cumberlidge N, Baillie JEM (2008) Broadening the coverage of biodiversity assessments. In: Vié J-C, Hilton-Taylor C, Stuart SN (eds) Wildlife in a changing world: an analysis of the 2008 IUCN red list of threatened species. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, pp 67–76Google Scholar
  14. Cowx IG (2002) Analysis of threats to freshwater fish conservation: past and present challenges. In: Collares-Pereira MJ, Cowx IG, Coelho M (eds) Conservation of freshwater fishes: options for the future. Fishing News Books, Oxford, pp 201–220Google Scholar
  15. Darwall W, Smith K, Lowe T, Vié J-C (2005) The status and distribution of freshwater biodiversity in Eastern Africa, vol 31, Species survival commission occasional paper. World Conservation Union, GlandGoogle Scholar
  16. De Leo GA, Levin S (1997) The multifaceted aspects of ecosystem integrity. Conserv Ecol 1: 3. Available at
  17. Döll P, Kaspar F, Lehner B (2003) A global hydrological model for deriving water availability indicators: model tuning and validation. J Hydrol 270:105–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dudgeon D, Arthington AH, Gessner MO, Kawabata ZI, Knowler DJ, Leveque C, Naiman RJ, Prieur-Richard AH, Soto D, Stiassny MLJ, Sullivan CA (2006) Freshwater biodiversity: importance threats status and conservation challenges. Biol Rev 81:163–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dynesius M, Nilsson C (1994) Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the northern third of the world. Science 266:753–762PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Environmental Systems Research Institute (1993) Digital Chart of the World. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, Calif. Available at
  21. Environmental Systems Research Institute (1992) ArcWorld 1:3M. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CalifGoogle Scholar
  22. FAO (1998) Database on the introduction of aquatic species (DIAS). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Available at
  23. FAO (1999) Review of the state of world fishery resources: Inland fisheries, vol 942, FAO fisheries circular. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, RomeGoogle Scholar
  24. FAO (2001) World river sediment yields database. FAO, Rome. Available at
  25. FAO (2003) Africover. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. Available at
  26. Farr TG, Kobrick M (2000) Shuttle radar topography mission produces a wealth of data. Eos Trans Am Geophys Union 81:583–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gergel SE, Turner MG, Miller JM, Melack JM, Stanley EH (2002a) Landscape indicators of human impacts to riverine systems. Aquat Sci 64:118–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gergel SE, Dixon MD, Turner MG (2002b) Consequences of human-altered floods: levees floods and floodplain forests along the Wisconsin River. Ecol Appl 12:1755–1770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gleick PH (2000) The changing water paradigm: a look at twenty-first century water resources development. Water Int 25:127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Global International Water Assessment (2002) Water issues: causal chain analysis. Global International Water Assessment, Kalmar, Sweden. Available at
  31. Global Water System Project (2005) The Global Water System Project: science framework and implementation activities. Global Water System Project, Bonn. Available at
  32. Gregory SV, Swanson FJ, McKee WA, Cummins KW (1991) An ecosystem perspective of riparian zones. Bioscience 41:540–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Groves CR (2003) Drafting a conservation blueprint: a practitioner’s guide to planning for biodiversity. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  34. Groves CR, Jensen DB, Valutis LL, Redford KH, Shaffer ML, Scott JM, Baumgartner JV, Higgins JV, Beck MW, Anderson MG (2002) Planning for biodiversity conservation: putting conservation science into practice. Bioscience 52:499–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Harding JS, Benfield EF, Bolstad PV, Helfman GS, Jones EBD (1998) Stream biodiversity: the ghost of land use past. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:14843–14847PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Harrison IJ, Stiassny MLJ (1999) The quiet crisis: a preliminary listing of the freshwater fishes of the world that are extinct or ‘missing in action’. In: MacPhee RDE (ed) Extinctions in near time: causes contexts and consequences. Kluwer Academic, New York, pp 271–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hearn P, Hare T, Schruben P, Sherrill D, Lamar C, Tsushima P (2000) Global GIS Database. US Geological Survey, Flagstaff. Available at
  38. Hodges JCF, Friedl MA, Strahler AH (2001) The MODIS global land cover product: new data sets for global land surface parameterization. Proc Global Change Open Sci Conf Amsterdam. Available at
  39. Hughes RM, Hunsaker CT (2002) Effects of landscape change on aquatic biodiversity and biointegrity. In: Gutzwiller KJ (ed) Applying landscape ecology in biological conservation. Springer, Berlin, pp 309–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. International Commission on Large Dams (2007) World register of Dams. International Commission on Large Dams, Paris. Available at
  41. IUCN (2001) Keeping on eye on threatened species: the IUCN Red List. World Conserv 3.Google Scholar
  42. IUCN (2008) IUCN Red list of threatened species. World Conservation Union, Gland. Available at
  43. Joint Research Centre, European Commission (2003) Global Land Cover (2000) database. Joint Research Centre European Commission, Ispra, Italy. Available at
  44. Jones JA, Swanson FJ, Wemple BC, Snyder KU (2000) Effects of roads on hydrology geomorphology and disturbance patches in stream networks. Conserv Biol 14:76–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Karr JR, Dudley DR (1981) Ecological perspective on water quality goals. Environ Manage 5:55–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lehner B, Döll P (2004) Development and validation of a global database of lakes reservoirs and wetlands. J Hydrol 296:1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lehner B, Verdin K, Jarvis A (2008) New global hydrography derived from spaceborne elevation data. Eos Transact 89(10):93–94. Available at Google Scholar
  48. Lehner B, Reidy Liermann C, Revenga C, Fekete B, Vörösmarty C, Crouzet P, Döll P, Endejan M, Frenken K, Magome J, Nilsson C, Robertson JC, Rödel R, Sindorf N, Wisser D (in review): High resolution mapping of the world’s reservoirs and dams for sustainable river flow management. Submitted to Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment,
  49. Ligon FK, Dietrich WE, Trush WJ (1995) Downstream ecological effects of dams. Bioscience 45:183–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Malmqvist B, Rundle S (2002) Threats to the running water ecosystems of the world. Environ Conserv 29:134–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McAllister DE, Parker BJ, McKee PM (1985) Rare, endangered, and extinct fishes in Canada, vol 54, Syllogeus. National Museums of Natural Sciences National Museums of Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  52. McAllister DE, Hamilton AL, Harvey B (1997) Global freshwater biodiversity: striving for the integrity of freshwater ecosystems. Sea Wind 11:1–140Google Scholar
  53. Miller RR, Williams JD, Williams JE (1989) Extinctions of North American fishes during the past century. Fisheries 14:22–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Niger Basin Authority (ABN) (2007) Niger river basin atlas. ABN, Niamey, NigerGoogle Scholar
  55. Nilsson C, Svedmark M, Hansson P, Xiong S, Berggren K (2000) River fragmentation and flow regulation analysis. unpublished data. Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.Google Scholar
  56. Nilsson C, Reidy CA, Dynesius M, Revenga C (2005) Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world’s large river systems. Science 308:405–408PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Norris RH, Thoms MC (1999) What is river health? Freshw Biol 41:197–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Noss RF (1992) The Wildlands Project: land conservation strategy. Wild Earth (Suppl, The Wildlands Project):10–25Google Scholar
  59. O’Keeffe JH, Danilewitz DB, Bradshaw JA (1987) An ‘expert system’ approach to the assessment of the conservation status of rivers. Biol Conserv 40:69–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. O’Neill RV, Hunsaker CT, Jones KB, Riitters KH, Wickham JD, Schwartz PM, Goodman IA, Jackson BL, Baillargeon WS (1997) Monitoring environmental quality at the landscape scale: using landscape indicators to assess biotic diversity watershed integrity and landscape stability. Bioscience 47:513–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Oak Ridge National Laboratory (2009) LandScan global population database. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge. Available at
  62. Peterson BJ, Wollheim WM, Mulholland PJ, Webster JR, Meyer JL, Tank JL, Martí E, Bowden WB, Valett HM, Hershey AE, McDowell WH, Dodds WK, Hamilton SK, Gregory S, Morrall DD (2001) Control of nitrogen export from watersheds by headwater streams. Science 292:86–90PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Poff NL, Hart DD (2002) How dams vary and why it matters for the emerging science of dam removal. Bioscience 52:659–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Poff NL, Brinson MM, Day JW (2002) Aquatic ecosystems and global climate change: potential impacts on inland freshwater and coastal wetland ecosystems in the United States. Pew Center on Global Climate Change, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  65. Postel S (2002) Rivers of life: the challenge of restoring health to freshwater ecosystems. Water Sci Technol 45:3–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Reaka-Kudla M (1997) The global biodiversity of coral reefs: a comparison with rain forests. In: Reaka-Kudla ML, Wilson DE, Wilson EO (eds) Biodiversity II: understanding and protecting our biological resources. Joseph Henry, Washington, DC, pp 83–103Google Scholar
  67. Revenga C, Brunner J, Henninger N, Kassem K, Payne R (2000) Pilot analysis of global ecosystems: freshwater systems. World Resources Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  68. Ricciardi A, Rasmussen JB (1999) Extinction rates of North American freshwater fauna. Conserv Biol 13:1220–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rosenberg DM, McCully P, Pringle CM (2000) Global-scale environmental effects of hydrological alterations. Bioscience 50(9):746–751CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Saunders DL, Meeuwig JJ, Vincent ACJ (2002) Freshwater protected areas: strategies for conservation. Conserv Biol 16:30–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sedell J, Sharpe M, Apple D, Copenhagen M, Furniss M (2000) Water and the forest service. FS-660. USDA Forest Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  72. Sidle RC, Sasaki S, Otsuki M, Noguchi S, Rahim Nik A (2004) Sediment pathways in a tropical forest: effects of logging roads and skid trails. Hydrol Process 18:703–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Siebert S, Döll P, Hoogeveen J, Faures J-M, Frenken K, Feick S (2005) Development and validation of the global map of irrigation areas. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 9:535–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Smakhtin V, Revenga C, Döll P (2004) A pilot global assessment of environmental water requirements and scarcity. Water Int 29(3):307–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Smith KG, Darwall WRT (2006) The status and distribution of freshwater fish endemic to the Mediterranean Basin. IUCN, GlandGoogle Scholar
  76. Stein BA, Kutner LS, Adams JS (eds) (2000) Precious heritage: the status of biodiversity in the United States. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  77. Stuart SN, Chanson JS, Cox NA, Young BE, Rodrigues ASL, Fischman DL, Waller RW (2004) Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide. Science 306:1783–1786PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Thieme ML, Abell RA, Stiassny MLJ, Skelton PH, Lehner B, Teugels GG, Dinerstein E, Kamdem-Toham A, Olson DM (2005) Freshwater ecoregions of Africa: a conservation assessment. World Wildlife Fund-US, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  79. Tockner K, Stanford JA (2002) Riverine flood plains: present state and future trends. Environ Conserv 29:308–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Turner RE, Rabalais NN, Justic D, Dortch Q (2003) Global patterns of dissolved N, P and Si in large rivers. Biogeochemistry 64:297–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Turtle Conservation Fund (2002) Global action plan for conservation of tortoises and freshwater turtles, strategy and funding prospectus, 2002–2007. Conservation International and Chelonian Research Foundation, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  82. United Nations (1997) Comprehensive assessment of the freshwater resources of the world. World Meteorological Organization and Stockholm Environment Institute, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  83. United Nations Environment Programme/Global Resource Information Database, Center for International Earth Science Information Network, World Resources Institute, National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis (2004) African population database, version 4. United Nations Environment Programme/Global Resource Information Database, Sioux Falls. Available at
  84. US Army Corps of Engineers (2007) National inventory of dams. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Alexandria. Available at
  85. US Geological Survey, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Joint Research Centre of the European Commission (1997) Global land cover characterization (GLCC), version 1.2. USGS, Washington, DC. Available at
  86. US National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration/National Geophysical Data Center (1998) Stable lights and radiance calibrated lights of the world CD-ROM. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration-National Geophysical Data Center, Boulder. Available at
  87. Vörösmarty CJ, Sharma KP, Fekete BM, Copeland AH, Holden J, Marble J, Lough JA (1997) The storage and aging of continental runoff in large reservoir systems of the world. Ambio 26:210–219Google Scholar
  88. Vörösmarty CJ, McIntyre PB, Gessner MO, Dudgeon D, Prusevich A, Green P, Glidden S, Bunn SE, Sullivan CA, Reidy Lierman C, Davies PM (2010) Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467:555–561PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Wang L, Lyons J, Kanehl P, Gatti R (1997) Influences of watershed land use on habitat quality and biotic integrity in Wisconsin streams. Fisheries 22:6–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Welcomme RL (2001) Inland fisheries: ecology and management. Blackwell Science, RomeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Welcomme R (2005) Impacts of fishing on inland fish populations in Africa. In: Thieme ML, Abell RA, Stiassny MLJ, Skelton PH, Lehner B, Teugels GG, Dinerstein E, Kamdem-Toham A, Olson DM (eds) Freshwater ecoregions of Africa: a conservation assessment. World Wildlife Fund-US, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  92. Wetlands International (2002) Special issue on the Niger Basin Initiative. Fadama Newsletter of the Wetlands International Africa Office, 5. Dakar-Yoff, SenegalGoogle Scholar
  93. Wetlands International (2007) Ramsar Sites Database. Wetlands International, Wageningen. Available at
  94. Williams JD, Warren ML, Cummings KS, Harris JL, Neves RJ (1993) Conservation status of freshwater mussels of the United States and Canada. Fisheries 18:6–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. World Commission on Dams (2000) Dams and development. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  96. World Resources Institute, WCMC World Conservation Monitoring Centre, PADCO, Inc (1995) Africa data sampler. CD-ROM. World Resources Institute, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Conservation Science Program, World Wildlife FundWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of GeographyMcGill UniversityWest MontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations