Empirical Analysis of the Relations between Environment and Development in Asia



The complex relations between environment and development is a constant issue that must be addressed in implementing the concept of sustainable development, which derives from the conflicts between the two and tries to ensure a dynamic balance between them. It is the primary objective of sustainable development to enhance the abilities of the environment to support human development and satisfy the needs of future generations.


Carbon Emission Resource Consumption Environmental Kuznets Curve Ecological Economic Pollutant Discharge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Akbostanci E, Türüt-Asik S, Tunc G I. 2009. The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: is there an environmental Kuznets curve? Energy Policy, 37(2): 861–867CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auci S, Becchetti L. 2006. The instability of the adjusted and unadjusted environmental Kuznets curves. Ecological Economics, 60: 282–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bartlett A A. 2006. Reflections on Sustainability, Population Growth, and the Environment. In: Keiner M ed. The Future of Sustainability. SpringerGoogle Scholar
  4. CAS Sustainable Development Strategy Study Group. 2010. China Sustainable Development Strategy Report 2010—Green Development and Innovation. Beijing: Science PressGoogle Scholar
  5. CAS Sustainable Development Strategy Study Group. 2009. China Sustainable Development Strategy Report 2009—China’s Approach towards a Low Carbon Future. Beijing: Science PressGoogle Scholar
  6. CAS Sustainable Development Strategy Study Group. 2006. China Sustainable Development Strategy Report 2006—Build a Resource-Efficient and Environment-Friendly Society. Beijing: Science PressGoogle Scholar
  7. Caviglia-Harris J L, Chambers D, Kahn J R. 2008. Taking the “U” out of Kuznets: a comprehensive analysis of the EKC and environmental degradation. Ecological Economics, 68(4): 1149–1159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. CDIAC. 2010-07-28. Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions. Scholar
  9. Chen S F, Liu Y, Zou X P, Su L Y. 2010. Study on the evolutionary stage of relationship between environment and economic development in China since 1949. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2: 49–55Google Scholar
  10. Chen S F, Wang Y. 2008. REPI-Based Evaluation for Resource-Efficient and Environment-Friendly Society in China. International Journal of Ecological Economics & Statistics, Summer, S08: 100–113Google Scholar
  11. Chimeli A B. 2007. Growth and the environment: are we looking at the right data? Economics Letter, 96: 89–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cleveland C J, Ruth M. 1999. Indicators of Dematerialization and the Materials Intensity of Use. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(3): 15–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Commoner B. 1971. The Closing Circle. New York: KnopfGoogle Scholar
  14. Dinda S. 2005. A theoretical basis for the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics, 53: 403–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dinda S. 2004. Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecological Economics, 49: 431–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Editorial Board of China Nonferrous Metals Industry Yearbooks. 2009. China Nonferrous Metals Industry Yearbook 2008. China Nonferrous Metals Industry AssociationGoogle Scholar
  17. Ehrlich P R, Ehrlich A H. 1970. Population, Resources, Environment: Issues in Human Ecology. San Francisco: FreemanGoogle Scholar
  18. EIA (U.S. Energy Information Administration). 2010-07-22. International Energy Statistics. Scholar
  19. Galeotti M, Lanza A, Pauli F. 2006. Reassessing the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a robustness exercise. Ecological Economics, 57: 152–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grossman G D, Krueger A B. 1991. Environmental impacts of the North American free trade agreement. NBER, Working Paper 3914Google Scholar
  21. Hettige H, Mani M, Wheeler D. 2000. Industrial pollution in economic development: the environmental Kuznets curve revisited. Journal of Development Economics, 62: 445–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huang W M, Lee G W M, Wu C C. 2008. GHG emissions, GDP growth and the Kyoto Protocol: a revisit of environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. Energy Policy, 36: 239–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Labys W C. 2010-08-25. Dematerialization and transmaterialization: what have we learned? USA: WVU regional research institute research paper series, Scholar
  24. Lantz V, Feng Q. 2006. Assessing income, population, and technology impacts on CO2 emissions in Canada: where’s the EKC? Ecological Economics, 57:229–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lindmark M. 2002. An EKC-pattern in historical perspective: carbon dioxide emission, technology, fuel prices and growth in Sweden 1870–1997. Ecological Economics, 42:333–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu Y, Chen S F, Zhang Y F, et al. 2008. Energy Kuznets Curve: Evidence from Developed Countries. Chinese Journal of Management Science (supplement), 16: 648–653Google Scholar
  27. Luzzati T, Orsini M. 2009. Investigating the energy-environmental Kuznets curve. Energy, 34(3): 291–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maddison. 2010-07-20. A. Historical Statistics of the World Economy: 1-2006 AD. Scholar
  29. Munasinghe M. 1999. Is environmental degradation an inevitable consequence of economic growth: tunnelling through the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics, 19: 89–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. OECD. 2002. Indicators to measure decoupling of environmental pressure from economic growth. Paris: OECDGoogle Scholar
  31. Perkins R. 2003. Environmental leapfrogging in developing countries: a critical assessment and reconstruction. Natural Resources Forum, 27: 177–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Renn O, Goble R, Kastenholz H. 1998. How to apply the concept of sustainability to a region? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 58: 63–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Richmond A K, Kaufmann R K. 2006. Is there a turning point in the relationship between income and energy use and/or carbon emissions? Ecological Economics, 56: 176–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Soytas U, Sari R, Ewing B T. 2007. Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States. Ecological Economics, 62: 482–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stern D I, Common M S. 2001. Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for sulfur? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 41: 162–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stern D I. 2010-07-25. The environmental Kuznets curve. Scholar
  37. Stern D I. 2004. The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development, 32(8): 1419–1439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sun J W. 1999. The nature of CO2 emission Kuznets curve. Energy Policy, 27: 691–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. UNEP Ozone Secretariat. 2010-07-25. Data Access Centre. Scholar
  40. UNEP. 2010-07-25. GEO Data Portal. Scholar
  41. Vehmas J, Luukkanen J, Kaivo-Oja J. 2007. Linking analyses and environmental Kuznets curves for aggregated material flows in the EU. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15: 1662–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Verbeke T, Clercq M D. 2006. The EKC: some really disturbing Monte Carlo evidence. Environmental Modeling & Software, 21: 1447–1454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. World Bank. 2010-08-15. Winds of Change: East Asia’s Sustainable Energy Future. Washington, DC: The World Bank. Scholar
  44. World Bank. 2010-07-24. World development indicators & global development finance database. Scholar
  45. World Steel Association. 2009. Steel Statistical Yearbook 2008, Brussels.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Science Press Beijing and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Gumi-Dong Bundang-Gu Seongnam-Shi Gyunggi-DoRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations