Abstract
The complex relations between environment and development is a constant issue that must be addressed in implementing the concept of sustainable development, which derives from the conflicts between the two and tries to ensure a dynamic balance between them. It is the primary objective of sustainable development to enhance the abilities of the environment to support human development and satisfy the needs of future generations.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Akbostanci E, Türüt-Asik S, Tunc G I. 2009. The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: is there an environmental Kuznets curve? Energy Policy, 37(2): 861–867
Auci S, Becchetti L. 2006. The instability of the adjusted and unadjusted environmental Kuznets curves. Ecological Economics, 60: 282–298
Bartlett A A. 2006. Reflections on Sustainability, Population Growth, and the Environment. In: Keiner M ed. The Future of Sustainability. Springer
CAS Sustainable Development Strategy Study Group. 2010. China Sustainable Development Strategy Report 2010—Green Development and Innovation. Beijing: Science Press
CAS Sustainable Development Strategy Study Group. 2009. China Sustainable Development Strategy Report 2009—China’s Approach towards a Low Carbon Future. Beijing: Science Press
CAS Sustainable Development Strategy Study Group. 2006. China Sustainable Development Strategy Report 2006—Build a Resource-Efficient and Environment-Friendly Society. Beijing: Science Press
Caviglia-Harris J L, Chambers D, Kahn J R. 2008. Taking the “U” out of Kuznets: a comprehensive analysis of the EKC and environmental degradation. Ecological Economics, 68(4): 1149–1159
CDIAC. 2010-07-28. Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions. http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/emis/meth_reg.html
Chen S F, Liu Y, Zou X P, Su L Y. 2010. Study on the evolutionary stage of relationship between environment and economic development in China since 1949. China Population, Resources and Environment, 2: 49–55
Chen S F, Wang Y. 2008. REPI-Based Evaluation for Resource-Efficient and Environment-Friendly Society in China. International Journal of Ecological Economics & Statistics, Summer, S08: 100–113
Chimeli A B. 2007. Growth and the environment: are we looking at the right data? Economics Letter, 96: 89–96
Cleveland C J, Ruth M. 1999. Indicators of Dematerialization and the Materials Intensity of Use. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2(3): 15–50
Commoner B. 1971. The Closing Circle. New York: Knopf
Dinda S. 2005. A theoretical basis for the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics, 53: 403–413
Dinda S. 2004. Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecological Economics, 49: 431–455
Editorial Board of China Nonferrous Metals Industry Yearbooks. 2009. China Nonferrous Metals Industry Yearbook 2008. China Nonferrous Metals Industry Association
Ehrlich P R, Ehrlich A H. 1970. Population, Resources, Environment: Issues in Human Ecology. San Francisco: Freeman
EIA (U.S. Energy Information Administration). 2010-07-22. International Energy Statistics. http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/cfapps/ipdbproject/IEDIndex3.cfm?tid=90&pid=44&aid=8
Galeotti M, Lanza A, Pauli F. 2006. Reassessing the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a robustness exercise. Ecological Economics, 57: 152–163
Grossman G D, Krueger A B. 1991. Environmental impacts of the North American free trade agreement. NBER, Working Paper 3914
Hettige H, Mani M, Wheeler D. 2000. Industrial pollution in economic development: the environmental Kuznets curve revisited. Journal of Development Economics, 62: 445–476
Huang W M, Lee G W M, Wu C C. 2008. GHG emissions, GDP growth and the Kyoto Protocol: a revisit of environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. Energy Policy, 36: 239–247
Labys W C. 2010-08-25. Dematerialization and transmaterialization: what have we learned? USA: WVU regional research institute research paper series, http://www.rri.wvu.edu/pdffiles/labyswp2004-1.pdf
Lantz V, Feng Q. 2006. Assessing income, population, and technology impacts on CO2 emissions in Canada: where’s the EKC? Ecological Economics, 57:229–238
Lindmark M. 2002. An EKC-pattern in historical perspective: carbon dioxide emission, technology, fuel prices and growth in Sweden 1870–1997. Ecological Economics, 42:333–347
Liu Y, Chen S F, Zhang Y F, et al. 2008. Energy Kuznets Curve: Evidence from Developed Countries. Chinese Journal of Management Science (supplement), 16: 648–653
Luzzati T, Orsini M. 2009. Investigating the energy-environmental Kuznets curve. Energy, 34(3): 291–300
Maddison. 2010-07-20. A. Historical Statistics of the World Economy: 1-2006 AD. www.ggdc.net/Maddison/Historical_Statistics/vertical-file_03-2009.xls
Munasinghe M. 1999. Is environmental degradation an inevitable consequence of economic growth: tunnelling through the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecological Economics, 19: 89–109
OECD. 2002. Indicators to measure decoupling of environmental pressure from economic growth. Paris: OECD
Perkins R. 2003. Environmental leapfrogging in developing countries: a critical assessment and reconstruction. Natural Resources Forum, 27: 177–188
Renn O, Goble R, Kastenholz H. 1998. How to apply the concept of sustainability to a region? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 58: 63–81
Richmond A K, Kaufmann R K. 2006. Is there a turning point in the relationship between income and energy use and/or carbon emissions? Ecological Economics, 56: 176–189
Soytas U, Sari R, Ewing B T. 2007. Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States. Ecological Economics, 62: 482–489
Stern D I, Common M S. 2001. Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for sulfur? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 41: 162–178
Stern D I. 2010-07-25. The environmental Kuznets curve. http://www.ecoeco.org/pdf/stern.pdf
Stern D I. 2004. The rise and fall of the environmental Kuznets curve. World Development, 32(8): 1419–1439
Sun J W. 1999. The nature of CO2 emission Kuznets curve. Energy Policy, 27: 691–694
UNEP Ozone Secretariat. 2010-07-25. Data Access Centre. http://ozone.unep.org/Data_Reporting/Data_Access/
UNEP. 2010-07-25. GEO Data Portal. http://geodata.grid.unep.ch/
Vehmas J, Luukkanen J, Kaivo-Oja J. 2007. Linking analyses and environmental Kuznets curves for aggregated material flows in the EU. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15: 1662–173
Verbeke T, Clercq M D. 2006. The EKC: some really disturbing Monte Carlo evidence. Environmental Modeling & Software, 21: 1447–1454
World Bank. 2010-08-15. Winds of Change: East Asia’s Sustainable Energy Future. Washington, DC: The World Bank. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTEASTASIAPACIFIC/Resources/226262-1271320774648/windsofchange_fullreport.pdf
World Bank. 2010-07-24. World development indicators & global development finance database. http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog
World Steel Association. 2009. Steel Statistical Yearbook 2008, Brussels.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Science Press Beijing and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
The Association of Academies of Sciences in Asia (AASA). (2011). Empirical Analysis of the Relations between Environment and Development in Asia. In: Towards a Sustainable Asia: Green Transition and Innovation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16675-4_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16675-4_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16674-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16675-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)