A Lightweight Macro-mobility Framework

  • Karel De Vogeleer
  • David Erman
  • Markus Fiedler
  • Adrian Popescu
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 45)

Abstract

This paper presents the design of a lightweight framework to provide vertical handover for macro-mobility on handheld devices. The framework is designed for mobile-controlled handover and does not require modification of the Internet infrastructure. The framework enables users to control the entire vertical handover process so handover decisions are driven by user preferences rather than ISP considerations. UDP tunneling is used as the basis for seamless roaming. Support nodes participate in mobility management by keeping track of the mobile users. We elaborate on a proof-of-concept implementation targeted to be deployed on the Android platform.

Keywords

Vertical Handover Always Best Connected (abc) Multihoming Seamless Roaming Mobility Management 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Atiquzzaman, M., Reaz, A.A.: Survey and classification of transport layer mobility management schemes. In: 16th International Symposium on Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, Berlin, Germany (September 2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Emmelmann, M., Wiethoelter, S., Koepsel, A., Kappler, C., Wolisz, A.: Moving towards seamless mobility state of the art and emerging aspects in standardization bodies. Springer’s International Journal on Wireless Personal Communication– Special Issue on Seamless Handover in Next Generation Wireless/Mobile Networks (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Feilner, M.: OpenVPN: Building and Integrating Virtual Private Networks. Packt Publishing (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Google (2009), http://www.android.com/
  5. 5.
    IEEE: Draft ieee standard for local and metropolian area networks: Media independent handover. P802.21/D8.0 (December 2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Johnson, D., Perkins, C., Arkko, J.: Mobility Support in IPv6. RFC 3775 (Proposed Standard) (June 2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Johnson, T., Prado, R., Zagari, E., Badan, T., Cardozo, E., Westberg, L.: Performance evaluation of reactive and proactive handover schemes for ip micromobility networks. In: Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, WCNC 2009, pp. 1–6. IEEE, Los Alamitos (April 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Le, D., Fu, X., Hogrefe, D.: A review of mobility support paradigms for the internet. IEEE Communications Surveys 8(1-4), 38–51 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leach, P., Mealling, M., Salz, R.: A Universally Unique IDentifier (UUID) URN Namespace. RFC 4122 (Proposed Standard) (July 2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Manner, J., Kojo, M.: Mobility Related Terminology. RFC 3753 (Informational) (June 2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Perimeter (2009), http://www.ict-perimeter.eu/
  12. 12.
    Perkins, C.: IP Mobility Support. RFC 2002 (Proposed Standard), obsoleted by RFC 3220 (October 1996), Updated by RFC 2290Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Perkins, C.: IP Mobility Support for IPv4. RFC 3344 (Proposed Standard) (August 2002), Updated by RFC 4721Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Science, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karel De Vogeleer
    • 1
  • David Erman
    • 1
  • Markus Fiedler
    • 1
  • Adrian Popescu
    • 1
  1. 1.Blekinge Institute of TechnologyKarlskronaSweden

Personalised recommendations