Skip to main content

Understanding Honeypot Data by an Unsupervised Neural Visualization

  • Conference paper
Computational Intelligence in Security for Information Systems 2010

Abstract

Neural projection techniques can adaptively map high-dimensional data into a low-dimensional space, for the user-friendly visualization of data collected by different security tools. Such techniques are applied in this study for the visual inspection of honeypot data, which may be seen as a complementary network security tool that sheds light on internal data structures through visual inspection. Empirical verification of the proposed projection methods was performed in an experimental domain where data were captured from a honeypot network. Experiments showed that visual inspection of these data, contributes to easily gain a deep understanding of attack patterns and strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Myerson, J.M.: Identifying Enterprise Network Vulnerabilities. International Journal of Network Management 12(3), 135–144 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Becker, R.A., Eick, S.G., Wilks, A.R.: Visualizing Network Data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 1(1), 16–28 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. D’Amico, A.D., Goodall, J.R., Tesone, D.R., Kopylec, J.K.: Visual Discovery in Computer Network Defense. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 27(5), 20–27 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Goodall, J.R., Lutters, W.G., Rheingans, P., Komlodi, A.: Focusing on Context in Network Traffic Analysis. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 26(2), 72–80 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Itoh, T., Takakura, H., Sawada, A., Koyamada, K.: Hierarchical Visualization of Network Intrusion Detection Data. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 26(2), 40–47 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Livnat, Y., Agutter, J., Moon, S., Erbacher, R.F., Foresti, S.: A Visualization Paradigm for Network Intrusion Detection. In: Sixth Annual IEEE SMC Information Assurance Workshop, IAW 2005 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Herrero, Á., Corchado, E., Gastaldo, P., Zunino, R.: Neural Projection Techniques for the Visual Inspection of Network Traffic. Neurocomputing 72(16-18), 3649–3658 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Herrero, Á., Corchado, E., Pellicer, M.A., Abraham, A.: MOVIH-IDS: A Mobile-Visualization Hybrid Intrusion Detection System. Neurocomputing 72(13-15), 2775–2784 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Charles, K.A.: Decoy Systems: A New Player in Network Security and Computer Incident Response. International Journal of Digital Evidence 2(3) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Provos, N.: A Virtual Honeypot Framework. In: 13th USENIX Security Symposium 132 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Baecher, P., Koetter, M., Holz, T., Dornseif, M., Freiling, F.: The Nepenthes Platform: An Efficient Approach to Collect Malware. In: Zamboni, D., Krügel, C. (eds.) RAID 2006. LNCS, vol. 4219, pp. 165–184. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Moore, D., Shannon, C., Brown, D.J., Voelker, G.M., Savage, S.: Inferring Internet Denial-of-service Activity. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems 24(2), 115–139 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahlberg, C., Shneiderman, B.: Visual Information Seeking: Tight Coupling of Dynamic Query Filters with Starfield Displays. In: Readings in Information Visualization: using Vision to Think, pp. 244–250. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Goodall, J.R., Lutters, W.G., Rheingans, P., Komlodi, A.: Preserving the Big Picture: Visual Network Traffic Analysis with TNV. In: IEEE Workshop on Visualization for Computer Security (VizSEC 2005). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Laskov, P., Dussel, P., Schafer, C., Rieck, K.: Learning Intrusion Detection: Supervised or Unsupervised? In: Roli, F., Vitulano, S. (eds.) ICIAP 2005. LNCS, vol. 3617, pp. 50–57. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Oja, E.: A Simplified Neuron Model as a Principal Component Analyzer. Journal of Mathematical Biology 15(3), 267–273 (1982)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Sanger, D.: Contribution Analysis: a Technique for Assigning Responsibilities to Hidden Units in Connectionist Networks. Connection Science 1(2), 115–138 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fyfe, C.: A Neural Network for PCA and Beyond. Neural Processing Letters 6(1-2), 33–41 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Corchado, E., Fyfe, C.: Connectionist Techniques for the Identification and Suppression of Interfering Underlying Factors. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence 17(8), 1447–1466 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fyfe, C., Corchado, E.: Maximum Likelihood Hebbian Rules. In: 10th European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks, ESANN 2002 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Friedman, J.H., Tukey, J.W.: A Projection Pursuit Algorithm for Exploratory Data-Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Computers 23(9), 881–890 (1974)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Corchado, E., MacDonald, D., Fyfe, C.: Maximum and Minimum Likelihood Hebbian Learning for Exploratory Projection Pursuit. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 8(3), 203–225 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. McHugh, J.: Testing intrusion detection systems: a critique of the 1998 and 1999 DARPA intrusion detection system evaluations as performed by Lincoln Laboratory. ACM Trans. Information System Security 3(4), 262–294 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zurutuza, U., Uribeetxeberria, R., Zamboni, D.: A Data Mining Approach for Analysis of Worm Activity through Automatic Signature Generation. In: 1st ACM Workshop on AISec. ACM, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Alonso, Á. et al. (2010). Understanding Honeypot Data by an Unsupervised Neural Visualization. In: Herrero, Á., Corchado, E., Redondo, C., Alonso, Á. (eds) Computational Intelligence in Security for Information Systems 2010. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, vol 85. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16626-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16626-6_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16625-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16626-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics