Advertisement

Abstract

Compilers for polymorphic languages are required to treat values in programs in an abstract and generic way at the source level. The challenges of optimizing the boxing of raw values, flattening of argument tuples, and raising the arity of functions that handle complex structures to reduce memory usage are old ones, but take on newfound import with processors that have twice as many registers. We present a novel strategy that uses both control-flow and type information to provide an arity raising implementation addressing these problems. This strategy is conservative — no matter the execution path, the transformed program will not perform extra operations.

Keywords

Selection Path Ideal Signature Calling Convention Intermediate Representation Access Path 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Tarditi, D., Diwan, A.: Measuring the cost of storage management. In: LASC, pp. 323–342 (1994)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Serrano, M.: Control flow analysis: a functional languages compilation paradigm. In: SAC 1995, pp. 118–122. ACM, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fluet, M., Rainey, M., Reppy, J., Shaw, A., Xiao, Y.: Manticore: A heterogeneous parallel language. In: DAMP 2007, pp. 37–44. ACM, New York (January 2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Barnes, J., Hut, P.: A hierarchical o(n log n) force calculation algorithm. Nature 324, 446–449 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    GHC: Barnes Hut benchmark written in Haskell, http://darcs.haskell.org/packages/ndp/examples/barnesHut/
  6. 6.
    Barber, C.B., Dobkin, D.P., Huhdanpaa, H.: The quickhull algorithm for convex hulls. ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software 22(4), 469–483 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nikhil, R.S.: ID Language Reference Manual. Laboratory for Computer Science. MIT, Cambridge (July 1991)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leroy, X.: Unboxed objects and polymorphic typing. In: POPL 1992, pp. 177–188. ACM, New York (1992)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peyton Jones, S.L., Launchbury, J.: Unboxed values as first class citizens in a non-strict functional language. In: Hughes, J. (ed.) FPCA 1991. LNCS, vol. 523, pp. 636–666. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Henglein, F., Jørgensen, J.: Formally optimal boxing. In: POPL 1994, pp. 213–226. ACM, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thiemann, P.J.: Unboxed values and polymorphic typing revisited. In: FPCA 1995, pp. 24–35. ACM, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goubault, J.: Generalized boxings, congruences and partial inlining. In: First International Static Analysis Symposium, Namur, Belgium (September 1994)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Serrano, M., Feeley, M.: Storage use analysis and its applications. In: ICFP 1996, pp. 50–61. ACM Press, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Faxén, K.F.: Representation analysis for coercion placement. In: Hermenegildo, M.V., Puebla, G. (eds.) SAS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2477, pp. 499–503. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leroy, X.: The effectiveness of type-based unboxing. In: Workshop on Types in Compilation, Amsterdam. ACM SIGPLAN, Boston College Computer Science Dept. Technical Report BCCS-97-03 (June 1997)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ashley, J.M., Dybvig, R.K.: A practical and flexible flow analysis for higher-order languages. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 20(4), 845–868 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tarditi, D., Morrisett, G., Cheng, P., Stone, C., Harper, R., Lee, P.: TIL: a type-directed optimizing compiler for ML. In: PLDI 1996, pp. 181–192. ACM, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tarditi, D., Morrisett, G., Cheng, P., Stone, C., Harper, R., Lee, P.: TIL: a type-directed, optimizing compiler for ML. SIGPLAN Not. 39(4), 554–567 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hannan, J., Hicks, P.: Higher-order arity raising. In: ICFP 1998, pp. 27–38. ACM, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ziarek, L., Weeks, S., Jagannathan, S.: Flattening tuples in an SSA intermediate representation. Higher-Order and Symbolic Computation 21(3), 845–868 (2008)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bolingbroke, M.C., Peyton Jones, S.L.: Types are calling conventions. In: HASKELL 2009, pp. 1–12. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lars Bergstrom
    • 1
  • John Reppy
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations