Testing Habitat Complexity as a Control over Bryozoan Colonial Growth Form and Species Distribution

Colonial Growth Form Ecology
  • Steven J. HagemanEmail author
  • Frank K. McKinney
  • Andrej Jaklin
Part of the Lecture Notes in Earth System Sciences book series (LNESS, volume 143)


The aim of this study is to test the effects of fine scale (microhabitat) environmental variation on the distribution of bryozoan species and potential variation in growth habit diversity and disparity. Data are derived from six microhabitats in replicate, on designed apparatuses, providing surfaces of varied complexity and orientation. The apparatuses were deployed on a sediment substrate at 24 m depth offshore of Rovinj, Croatia and recovered 14 months later. Species distributions were documented for each microhabitat and indexed for relative abundance. Twenty-five bryozoan species were recorded in multiple 0.5 × 0.5 cm cells in multiple patches on each microhabitat. Species richness was relatively uniform in each microhabitat, but most individual species and several growth habit attributes differed in abundance or presence among microhabitats.


Recruitment Species richness Growth habit Ecology Adriatic Sea 



We thank M. Novosel and A. Novosel for their help and advice in acquiring materials for constructing the experimental apparatuses. This research was supported by a Fulbright Research Fellowship to SJH, and the University Research Council of Appalachian State University.


  1. Barnes DKA, Dick MH (2000) Overgrowth competition in encrusting bryozoan assemblages of the intertidal and infralittoral zones of Alaska. Mar Biol 136:813–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burgess SC, Hart SP, Marshall DJ (2009) Pre-settlement behavior in larval bryozoans: the roles of larval age and size. Biol Bull 216:344–354Google Scholar
  3. Dobretsov S, Qian P-Y (2006) Facilitation and inhibition of larval attachment of the bryozoan Bugula neritina in association with mono-species and multi-species biofilms. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 333:263–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hammer O (2010) PAST, PAleontological STatistics version 2.01 reference manual. Natural History Museum, University of OsloGoogle Scholar
  5. Hayward PJ, McKinney FK (2002) Northern Adriatic Bryozoa from the vicinity of Rovinj, Croatia. Bull Am Mus Nat Hist 270:1–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Lidgard S (2008) Predation on marine bryozoan colonies: taxa, traits and trophic groups. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 359:117–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lidgard S, Jackson JBC (1989) Growth in encrusting cheilostome bryozoans. Paleobiology 15:255–282Google Scholar
  8. Mariani S, Alcoverro T et al (2005) Early life histories in the bryozoan Schizobrachiella sanguinea: a case study. Mar Biol 147:735–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pemberton AJ, Hansson LJ et al (2007) Microscale genetic differentiation in a sessile invertebrate with cloned larvae: investigating the role of polyembryony. Mar Biol 153:71–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ryland J (1977) Taxes and tropisms of bryozoans. In: Woollacott RM, Zimmer RL (eds) Biology of bryozoans. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Sanders H (1968) Marine benthic diversity: a comparative study. Am Nat 102:243–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Stach LW (1936) Correlation of zoarial form with habitat. J Geol 44:60–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sutherland J, Karlson R (1977) Development and stability of the fouling community at Beaufort, North Carolina. Ecol Monogr 47:425–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steven J. Hageman
    • 1
    Email author
  • Frank K. McKinney
    • 1
  • Andrej Jaklin
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of GeologyAppalachian State UniversityBooneUSA
  2. 2.Ruđer Bošković Institute, Center for Marine ResearchRovinjCroatia

Personalised recommendations