Advertisement

Shell Mathematical Models

  • Dominique Chapelle
  • Klaus-Jürgen Bathe
Chapter
  • 3.4k Downloads
Part of the Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics book series (COMPFLUID)

Abstract

In this chapter we describe and analyse the linear shell models that we consider in this book. We first describe the fundamental shell kinematics used. Then we discuss the “basic shell model” which is implicitly employed in general finite element solutions and from which other classical shell and plate models can be derived. We summarize the shell models that we call the “shear-membrane-bending model” and the “membrane-bending model”, and introduce the proper mathematical framework in which they define well-posed problems. As special cases of these shell models we obtain well-known plate models.

Keywords

Shell Model Rigid Body Motion Plate Model Essential Boundary Condition Kinematical Assumption 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Ciarlet, P.G. (2000). Mathematical Elasticity - Volume III: Theory of Shells. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  2. Kim, D.N., & Bathe, K.J. (2008). A 4-node 3D-shell element to model shell surface tractions and incompressible behavior. Comput. & Structures, 86(21-22), 2027-2041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Reissner, E. (1945). The effect of transverse shear deformation on the bending of elastic plates. J. Appl. Mech., 67, A69-A77.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. Bathe, K.J., & Wilson, E.L. (1974). Thick shells. In W. Pilkey, K. Saczalski, & H. Schaeér (Eds.) Structural Mechanics Computer Programs.Google Scholar
  5. Sansour, C. (1995). A theory and finite element formulation of shells at finite deformations involving thickness change: circumventing the use of a rotation tensor. Arch. Appl. Mech., 65, 194-216.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Flügge, W. (1973). Stresses in Shells. New York, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2nd ed.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. Coutris, N. (1978). Théorème d’existence et d’unicité pour un problème de coque élastique dans le cas d’un modèle linéaire de P.M. Naghdi. R.A.I.R.O. Anal. Numér., 12, 51-57.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Green, A.E., & Zerna, W. (1968). Theoretical Elasticity. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2nd ed.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. Timoshenko, S., & Woinowsky-Krieger, S. (1959). Theory of Plates and Shells. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  10. Mindlin, R.D. (1951). Inuence of rotary inertia and shear on exural motion of isotropic elastic plates. J. Appl. Mech., 18, 31-38.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Reissner, E. (1952). Stress strain relations in the theory of thin elastic shells. J. Math. Phys., 31, 109-119.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. Ciarlet, P.G. (1988). Mathematical Elasticity - Volume I: Three-Dimensional Elasticity. Amsterdam: North-Holland.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. Blouza, A., & Le Dret, H. (1999). Existence and uniqueness for the linear Koiter model for shells with little regularity. Quart. Appl. Math., 57, 317-337.zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. Valid, R. (1995). The Nonlinear Theory of Shells through Variational Principles. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Bathe, K.J. (1996). Finite Element Procedures. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Bernadou, M., & Ciarlet, P.G. (1975). Sur l’ellipticité du modéle linéaire de coques de W.T. Koiter. In R. Glowinski, & J. Lions (Eds.) Computing Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  17. Delfour, M.C. (2000). Tangential diérential calculus and functional analysis on a C1,1 submanifold. In R. Gulliver, W. Littman, & R. Triggiani (Eds.) Diérential-Geometric Methods in the Control of Partial Differential Equations, (pp. 83-115). Providence: AMS.Google Scholar
  18. Calladine, C.R. (1983). Theory of Shell Structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Wunderlich, W. (1980). On a consistent shell theory in mixed tensor formulation. In Proc. 3rd IUTAM Symposium on Shell Theory: Theory of Shells. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  20. Bathe, K.J., Sussman, T., & Walczak, J. (201x). Crash and crush shell analyses with implicit integration. In preparation.Google Scholar
  21. Love, A.E.H. (1927). Mathematical Theory of Elasticity. 4th ed.Google Scholar
  22. Alessandrini, S.M., Arnold, D.N., Falk, R.S., & Madureira, A. L. (1999). Derivation and justification of plate models by variational methods. In Plates and shells (Québec, QC, 1996), vol. 21 of CRM Proc. Lecture Notes, (pp. 1-20). Providence: Amer. Math. Soc.Google Scholar
  23. Novozhilov, V.V. (1970). Thin Shell Theory. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff Publishing, 2nd ed.Google Scholar
  24. Naghdi, P.M. (1963). Foundations of elastic shell theory. In Progress in Solid Mechanics, vol. 4, (pp. 1-90). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  25. Koiter, W.T. (1965). On the nonlinear theory of thin elastic shells. Proc. Kon. Ned. Akad. Wetensch., B69, 1-54.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. Chapelle, D., & Ferent, A. (2003). Modeling of the inclusion of a reinforcing sheet within a 3D medium. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 13, 573-595.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. Delfour, M.C. (1999). Intrinsic P(2,1) thin shell model and Naghdi’s models without a priori assumption on the stress tensor. In K. Hoffmann, G. Leugering, & F. Tröltzsch (Eds.) Optimal Control of Partial Diérential Equations, (pp. 99-113). Basel: Birkhäuser.Google Scholar
  28. Hencky, H. (1947). Über die Berücksichtigung der Schubverzerrung in ebenen Platten. Ingenieur Archiv, 16, 72-76.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dominique Chapelle
    • 1
  • Klaus-Jürgen Bathe
    • 2
  1. 1.INRIA Paris-RocquencourtLe ChesnayFrance
  2. 2.Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations