Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 111))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Ontologies have been widely used in almost any field of application. The use of ontologies should involve the possibility of evaluation of the quality and correctness of them. Some tools and metrics have been proposed to reach this goal. ONTOMETRIC, OntoQA and Protégé represent the most important tools to evaluate ontologies. On the other hand, diverse cohesion, coupling and ranking metrics have also been proposed, as well as methodologies such as OntoClean. This paper analyses these tools and metrics, compare them and finally reviews the current state-of-the-art concerning to ontology metrics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Makris, K., Bikakis, N., Gioldasis, N., Tsinaraki, C., Christodoulakis, S.: Towards a Mediator Based on OWL and SPARQL. In: Lytras, M.D., Damiani, E., Carroll, J.M., Tennyson, R.D., Avison, D., Naeve, A., Dale, A., Lefrere, P., Tan, F., Sipior, J., Vossen, G. (eds.) WSKS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5736, pp. 326–335. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Salguero, A., Delgado, C., Araque, F.: STOWL: An OWL Extension for Facilitating the Definition of Taxonomies in Spatio-temporal Ontologies. In: Lytras, M.D., Damiani, E., Carroll, J.M., Tennyson, R.D., Avison, D., Naeve, A., Dale, A., Lefrere, P., Tan, F., Sipior, J., Vossen, G. (eds.) WSKS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5736, pp. 326–335. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Antoniou, G., van Harmelen, F.: A Semantic Web Primer, 2nd edn. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guarino, N., Welty, C.: An Overview of OntoClean. In: The Handbook on Ontologies, pp. 151–172. Springer, Berlin (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Guarino, N., Welty, C.: Evaluating Ontological Decisions with OntoClean. Communications of the ACM, 61–65 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vrandecic, D., Sure, Y.: How to Design Better Ontology Metrics. In: Franconi, E., Kifer, M., May, W. (eds.) ESWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4519, pp. 311–325. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Alani, H., Brewster, C., Shadbolt, N.: Ranking Ontologies with AKTiveRank. In: Cruz, I., Decker, S., Allemang, D., Preist, C., Schwabe, D., Mika, P., Uschold, M., Aroyo, L.M. (eds.) ISWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4273, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Tartir, S., Arpinar, B., Moore, M., Sheth, A., Aleman-meza, B.: OntoQA: Metric-based ontology quality analysis. In: CiteSeerX - Scientific Literature Digital Library and Search Engine (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tartir, S., Arpinar, B.: Ontology Evaluation and Ranking using OntoQA. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Semantic Computing (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Orme, A., Yao, H., Etzkorn, L.: Coupling Metrics for Ontology-Based Systems. IEEE Software, 102–108 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lozano-Tello, A., Gómez-Pérez, A.: ONTOMETRIC: A Method to Choose the Appropiate Ontology. Journal of Database Management (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Alani, H., Brewster, C.: Metrics for Ranking Ontologies. In: 4th Int. EON Workshop, 15th Int. World Wide Web Conference (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yao, H., Orme, A., Etzkorn, L.: Cohesion Metrics for Ontology Design and Application. Journal of Computer Science 1(1), 107–113 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ma, Y., Jin, B., Feng, Y.: Semantic oriented ontology cohesion metrics for ontology-based systems. The Journal of Systems and Software (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yang, Z., Zhang, D., Chuan, Y.E.: Evaluation Metrics for Ontology Complexity and Evolution Analysis. In: IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering, ICEBE 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

García, J., García-Peñalvo, F.J., Therón, R. (2010). A Survey on Ontology Metrics. In: Lytras, M.D., Ordonez De Pablos, P., Ziderman, A., Roulstone, A., Maurer, H., Imber, J.B. (eds) Knowledge Management, Information Systems, E-Learning, and Sustainability Research. WSKS 2010. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 111. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16318-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16318-0_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16317-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16318-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics