Skip to main content

BPEL vs. BPMN 2.0: Should You Care?

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 67))

Abstract

BPMN 2.0 is an executable process modeling language. Thus, its relation to BPEL becomes an issue. In this paper, we propose a positioning of both languages, introduce the notion of a “native metamodel”, and emphasize the role of the native metamodel of a process engine for the actual discussion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Web Services Business Process Execution Language Version 2.0, OASIS (2007), http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsbpel/2.0/wsbpel-v2.0.pdf (June 20, 2010)

  2. WS-BPEL Extension for People (BPEL4People) Specification Version 1.1, http://docs.oasis-open.org/bpel4people/bpel4people-1.1.html (June 20, 2010)

  3. Business Process Model and Notation, OMG 2009 (2009), http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/Beta1/PDF/ (June 20, 2010)

  4. Kloppmann, M.: BPMN and BPEL – the relationship of two BPM standards, https://apps.lotuslive.com/bpmblueworks/blog/?p=889 (June 20, 2010)

  5. Leymann, F.: BPEL vs BPMN 2.0: Should you care? http://leymann.blogspot.com/ (June 20, 2010)

  6. Leymann, F., Roller, D.: Production Workflow. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Leymann, F., Karastoyanova, D., Papazoglou, M.: Influential BPM Standards: History and Essence. In: vom Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds.) Handbook on Business Process Management. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rowley, M.: Which is simpler: BPMN or BPEL, http://www.vosibilities.com/bpel/bpmn-or-bpel-which-is-simpler/2009/11/19/ (June 20, 2010)

  9. Rowley, M.: BPMN 2.0 with BPEL – the debate is just starting, http://www.vosibilities.com/bpel/bpmn-with-bpel-the-debate-is-just-starting/2009/11/23/ (June 20, 2010)

  10. Silver, B.: BPMN vs BPEL: Are we still debating this? http://www.brsilver.com/2009/11/19/bpmn-vs-bpel-are-we-still-debating-this/ (June 20, 2010)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Leymann, F. (2010). BPEL vs. BPMN 2.0: Should You Care?. In: Mendling, J., Weidlich, M., Weske, M. (eds) Business Process Modeling Notation. BPMN 2010. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 67. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16298-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16298-5_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16297-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16298-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics