Skip to main content

Microtraining for Workplace-Related Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Automation, Communication and Cybernetics in Science and Engineering 2009/2010

Abstract

Today’s working and business life is characterized by broad economic and social trends. Due to these external effects, companies face an increasing demand for up-to-date knowledge in order to stay competitive. Microtraining is one answer to increasing organizational learning needs. Its methodology is based on the concept of short learning units, supporting workplace-related learning, which is especially important in the context of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Microtraining is time and cost-saving, highly flexible and can be tailored to organizational learning demands (short, medium and long term).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. E. Abele and et al. Wissensmanagement in KMU. Entwicklung einesWerkzeugkastensfür kleine und mittelständische Unternehmen. Zeitschrift für wirtschaftlichen Fabrikbetrieb, pages 375–379, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  2. E. Aronson. The social animal. Worth/Freeman, New York, 2008. 10th ed.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. Bandura. Social Learning Theory. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  4. C. Bonwell and J. Eison. Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom AEHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No.1v. Jossey-Bass, Washington, D.C., 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  5. D. Butler and P.H Winne. Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis.Review of Educational Research, 65:245–281, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  6. J. Cross. Informal Learning: Rediscovering the Natural Pathways that Inspire Innovation and Performance. Pfeiffer, San Francisco, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Downes. E-learning 2.0. eLearn Magazine. www.elearnmag.org/subpage.cfm?section=articles&article=29-1, downloaded 2010-05-17, 2005.

  8. O. Döring and S. Turnwald. Personalentwicklung in kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen:Anforderungen, Möglichkeiten, Grenzen und Perspektiven. Retrieved. www.f-bb.de/uploads/tx_fffbb/Fachartikel_PE_in_KMU_Doering.pdf, downloaded 2010-04-20, 2008.

  9. P. de Vries and T. Leege. Final Report WP 1:Bedarfsanalyse. Reload project. DE/07/LLP-LdV/TOI/147058. Leonardo Project: European Union. Technical report, LeonardoProject: European Union., 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. Farvaque. Guide for Training in SMEs. DG Employment, Social Affairs and EqualOpportunities. European Commission. www.ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?langId=en&catId=89&newsId=544&furtherNews, downloaded 2010-05-10, 2009.

  11. Bundesinstitut für Berufsbildung. Weiterbildungsbeteiligung in KMU. www.kibb.de/cps/uploads/559_Weiterbildung_in_KMU_Antwort1.1219152837800.pdf, downloaded2010-04-20, 2008.

  12. H. J. Hartman. Metacognition in Learning and Instruction: Theory, Research and Practice. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Holzinger, A. Nischelwitzer, and M. Meisenberg. Mobile Phones as a Challengefor m-Learning: Examples for Mobile Interactive Learning Objects (MILOs). In 3rd International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication (IEEE), pages 307–311, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  14. D.L. Kirkpatrick. Another look at evaluating training programs. American Society forTraining & Development, Alexandria, VA:, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. Mayer. Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? Thecase for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist, 59:14–19, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Microteaching - modular teaching and learning solutions for a needs based education.www.microteaching.org, downloaded 2010-05-10, 2007.

  17. Microtraining for effective learning. www.microtraining.eu, downloaded 2010-05-10,2010.

  18. Shared mental models, team coordination, and team performance. In Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  19. I. Nonaka and H. Takeuchi. The knowledge creating company: how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford University Press, New York, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Conference Board of Canada. Workplace Learning in Small and Medium-sized Enterprises:Effective Practices for Improving Productivity and Competitiveness. OverviewReport. 2009. http://www.ccl-cca.ca/pdfs/OtherReports/CBofC-WorkplaceLearning-SME-OverviewReport.pdf, downloaded 2010-04-28.

  21. Peter Pawlowsky, Lutz Gerlach, Stefan Hauptmann, and Annett Puggel. Wissen alsWettbewerbsvorteil in kleinen und mittelständischen Unternehmen. Empirische Typologisierungen auf Grundlage einer bundesweiten Befragung. FOKUS prints 09/06. Technical Report 09/06, Technische Universität Chemnitz, Chemnitz, 2006.http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/wirtschaft/bwl6/prints/fokus_prints_09-06.pdf , downloaded2010-04-20.

  22. G. Probst, S. Raub, and K. Romhardt. Wissen managen. Wie Unternehmen ihre wertvollste Ressource optimal nutzen. Gabler, Wiesbaden, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  23. R. Verburg and et al. Managing Technology and Innovation. An introduction. Routledge, Oxford, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  24. L. Vygotsky. Mind in Society. Harvard University Press, London, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  25. H.K. Wahren. Das lernende Unternehmen: Theorie und Praxis des organizationalen Lernens. Gruyter, Berlin/New York, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  26. D. Weinberger. Small pieces loosely joined: A unified theory of the web. Basic Books, New York, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Carina Thelen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Thelen, A.C., Herr, S.D., Hees, F., Jeschke, S. (2011). Microtraining for Workplace-Related Learning. In: Jeschke, S., Isenhardt, I., Henning, K. (eds) Automation, Communication and Cybernetics in Science and Engineering 2009/2010. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16208-4_31

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics