Causes and Consequences of the Utilization of Work-Life Policies by Professionals: “Unconditional Supervisor Support Required”

  • Bram Peper
  • Josje Dikkers
  • Claartje Vinkenburg
  • Marloes van Engen
Chapter

Abstract

The European workplace has changed. Employees increasingly ask for organizational policies that allow them to combine their work and their private lives (Lewis et al., 2009). In the Netherlands it is estimated that no less than 40% of employees face troubles in combining their work and private lives (Geurts et al., 2003), which brings high costs, both for individuals and for organizations (Allen et al., 2000).

References

  1. Allen TD, Herst DEL, Bruck CS, Sutton M (2000) Consequences related to work-to-family conflict: a review and agenda to future research. J Occup Health Psychol 5:278–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almer ED, Cohen JR, Single LE (2004) Is it the kids or the schedule?: the incremental effect of families and flexible scheduling on perceived career success. J Bus Ethics 54:51–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson SE, Coffey BS, Byerly RT (2002) Formal organizational initiatives and informal workplace practices: links to work–family conflict and job-related outcomes. J Manage 28:787–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Appelbaum E, Bailey T, Berg P, Kalleberg A (2005) Organizations and the intersection of work and family: a comparative perspective. In Ackroyd S, Batt R, Thompson P, Tolbert PS (eds) The Oxford handbook of work and organization. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York, pp 52–73Google Scholar
  5. Arthur MB, Hall DT, Lawrence BS (1989) Generating new directions in career theory: the case for a transdisciplinary approach. In Arthur MB, Hall DT, Lawrence BS (eds) Handbook of career theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 7–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Das Dores Guerreiro M, Abrantes P, Pereira I (2004) Transitions case studies summary report for the EU Framework 5 study ‘Gender, parenthood and the changing European workplace’. RIHSC, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  7. Den Dulk L (2001) Work-family arrangements in organisations: a cross-national study in the Netherlands, Italy, the United Kingdom and Sweden. Rozenberg Publishers, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  8. Den Dulk L, De Ruijter J (2008) Managing work-life policies: disruptive versus dependency arguments. Explaining managerial attitudes towards employee utilization of work-life policies. Int J Hum Resour Manage 19:1224–1238Google Scholar
  9. Den Dulk L, Peper B (2007) Working parents’ use of work-life policies. Sociol Probl Prát 53:51–70Google Scholar
  10. Den Dulk L, Peper B (2009) Managing work-life policies in the European workplace: explorations for future research. Working Papers on the Reconciliation of Work and Welfare in Europe No. 04-2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1489879
  11. Dikkers JSE, Demerouti E (under review) Mapping terra incognita: work-home culture and its associations with work-related antecedents over time. J Vocat BehavGoogle Scholar
  12. Dikkers JSE, Geurts SAE, Den Dulk L, Peper B, Kompier MAJ (2004) Relations among work-home culture, the utilization of work-home arrangements, and work-home interference. Int J Stress Manage 11:323–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dikkers JSE, Geurts SAE, Den Dulk L, Peper B, Taris TW, Kompier MAJ (2007) Dimensions of work-home culture and their relations with the use of work-home arrangements and work-home interaction. WorkStress 21:155–172Google Scholar
  14. Eby LT, Casper WJ, Lockwood A, Bordeaux C, Brinley A (2005) Work and family research in IO/OB: content analysis and review of the literature (1980–2002). J Vocat Behav 66:124–197Google Scholar
  15. Fried M (1999) Parental leave policy and corporate culture. Women and Work 1:11–26Google Scholar
  16. Friedman S, Christensen P, De Groot J (1998) Work and life: the end of the zero-sum gamer. Harv Bus Rev 119–127 volume 76 No 6 p119–29 Nov-Dec 1998Google Scholar
  17. Geurts SAE, Kompier MAJ, Rosburgh S, Houtman ILD (2003) Does work-home interference mediate the relationship between workload and well-being?. J Vocat Behav 63:532–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Geurts SAE, Taris TW, Kompier MAJ, Dikkers JSE, Van Hooff MLM, Kinnunen UM (2005) Work home interaction from a work psychological perspective: development and validation of a new questionnaire, the SWING. Work Stress 19:319–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Glass J (2004) Blessing or curse? Work-family policies and mother’s wage growth over time. Work Occup 31:367–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greenhaus JH, Beutell NJ (1985) Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Acad Manage Rev 10:76–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Greenhaus JH, Powell GN (2006) When work and family are allies: a theory of work-family enrichment. Acad Manage Rev 31:72–92Google Scholar
  22. Haas LL, Hwang P, Russell G, (Eds) (2000) Organizational change and gender equity: international perspectives on fathers and mothers at the workplace. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  23. Higgins G, Duxbury L, Johnson KL (2000) Part-time work for women: does it really help balance work and family?. Hum Resour Manage 39:17–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hopkins K (2005) Supervisor support and work-life integration: a social identity perspective. In Kossek EE, Lambert S (eds) Work and life integration: organizational, cultural, and individual perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 445–467Google Scholar
  25. Judge TA, Cable DM, Boudreau JW, Bretz RD (1995) An empirical investigation of the predictors of executive career success. Pers Psychol 48:485–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Judiesch MK, Lyness KS (1999) Left behind? The impact of leaves of absence on managers’ career success. Acad Manage J 42:641–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kinnunen UM, Mauno S, Geurts SAE, Dikkers JSE (2005) Work-family culture in organizations: theoretical and empirical approaches. In Poelmans SAY (ed) Work and family: an international perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 87–120Google Scholar
  28. Kirby EL (2000) Should I do as you say or do as you do? Mixed messages about work and family. The Electronic Journal of Communication/La Revue de Electronique de Communication, 10. http://www.cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/010/3/010313.html. Accessed on 10 Feb 2010
  29. Klein KJ, Berman LM, Dickson MW (2000) May I work part-time? An exploration of predicted employer responses to employee request for part-time work. J Vocat Behav 57:85–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kossek EE, Friede A (2006) The business case: managerial perspectives on work and the family. In Pitt-Catsouphes M, Kossek EE, Sweet S (eds) The work and family handbook: multi-disciplinary perspectives, methods, and approaches. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 611–626Google Scholar
  31. Kossek EE, Lautsch BA, Eaton SC (2006) Telecommuting, control, and boundary management: correlates of policy use and practice, job control, and work-family effectiveness. J Vocat Behav 68:347–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lewis S (2003) Flexible work arrangements: implementation, outcomes and management. In Cooper CL, Robertson IT (eds) International review of industrial and organizational psychology, vol 18. Wiley, New York, NY, pp 1–28Google Scholar
  33. Lewis S, Brannen J, Nilsen A, (Eds) (2009) Work, families and organisations in transition. European perspectives. The Policy Press, BristolGoogle Scholar
  34. Lewis S, Taylor K (1996) Evaluating the impact of family-friendly employment policies: a case study. In Lewis S, Lewis J (eds) The work-family challenge: rethinking employment. Sage, London, pp 112–127Google Scholar
  35. Maxwell GA (2005) Checks and balances: the role of managers in work-life balance policies and practices. J Retailing Consum Serv 12:179–189Google Scholar
  36. Merens A, Hermans B (2009) Emancipatiemonitor 2008 (SCP-publicatie 2009/2. Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  37. Mesmer-Magnus JR, Viswesvaran C (2006) How family-friendly work environments affect work/family conflict: a meta-analytic examination. J Lab Res 27:555–574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ng TWH, Eby LT, Sorensen KL, Feldman DC (2005) Predictors of objective and subjective career success: a meta-analysis. Pers Psychol 58:367–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. OECD (2007) Employment outlook 2007 (Statistical Annex). OECD Publishing, Paris. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/29/27/38749309.pdf. Accessed on 1 Oct 2007
  40. Perlow LA (1995) Putting the work back into work/family. Group Organ Manage 20:227–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Perlow LA (1997) Finding time: how corporations, individuals and families can benefit from new work practices. ILR Press, Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  42. Peters P, Den Dulk L (2003) Cross cultural differences in managers’ support for home-based telework: a theoretical elaboration. Int J Cross Cult Manage 3:329–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Poelmans S, Beham B (2005) A conceptual model of antecedents and consequences of managerial work-life policy allowance decisions. International Center of Work and Family, Inaugural Conference, Barcelona/Spain, 7–9 July 2005Google Scholar
  44. Powell GN, Mainiero LA (1999) Managerial decision making regarding alternative work arrangements. J Occup Organ Psychol 72:41–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rapoport R (2002) Beyond work-family balance: advancing gender equity and workplace performance. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  46. Starrels ME (1992) The evolution of workplace family policy research. J Fam Issues 13:259–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ten Brummelhuis L (2009) Family matters at work. Depleting and enriching effects of employees’ family lives on work outcomes. ICS, UtrechtGoogle Scholar
  48. Thompson CA, Beauvais LL, Lyness KS (1999) When work-family benefits are not enough: the influence of work-family culture on benefit utilization, organizational attachment, and work family-conflict. J Vocat Behav 54:392–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tomlinson J (2006) Routes to part-time management in service sector organizations: implications for women’s skills, flexibility and progression. Gen Work Organ 13:585–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Van Steenbergen EF (2007) Work-family facilitation: a positive psychological perspective on role combination. Universiteit Leiden, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  51. Veenis E (2000) Als het bedrijf er maar niet teveel last van heeft: De invloed van het ouderschapsbeleid en de ouderschapscultuur op de combinatieproblemen van mannelijk en vrouwelijke werknemers met jonge kinderen in supermarkten en boekhandels. Proefschrift, Universiteit Utrecht. Pasmans, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  52. Yeandle S, Phillips J, Scheibl F, Wigfield A, Wise S (2003) Line managers and family-friendly employment. Roles and perspectives. The Policy Press, BristolGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bram Peper
    • 1
  • Josje Dikkers
    • 2
  • Claartje Vinkenburg
    • 2
  • Marloes van Engen
    • 3
  1. 1.Erasmus University RotterdamRotterdamNetherlands
  2. 2.VU University AmsterdamAmsterdamNetherlands
  3. 3.Tilburg UniversityTilburgNetherlands

Personalised recommendations