Skip to main content

Learning without Coding

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6331))

Abstract

Iterative learning is a model of language learning from positive data, due to Wiehagen. When compared to a learner in Gold’s original model of language learning from positive data, an iterative learner can be thought of as memory-limited. However, an iterative learner can memorize some input elements by coding them into the syntax of its hypotheses. A main concern of this paper is: to what extent are such coding tricks necessary?

One means of preventing some such coding tricks is to require that the hypothesis space used be free of redundancy, i.e., that it be 1-1. By extending a result of Lange & Zeugmann, we show that many interesting and non-trivial classes of languages can be iteratively identified in this manner. On the other hand, we show that there exists a class of languages that cannot be iteratively identified using any 1-1 effective numbering as the hypothesis space.

We also consider an iterative-like learning model in which the computational component of the learner is modeled as an enumeration operator, as opposed to a partial computable function. In this new model, there are no hypotheses, and, thus, no syntax in which the learner can encode what elements it has or has not yet seen. We show that there exists a class of languages that can be identified under this new model, but that cannot be iteratively identified. On the other hand, we show that there exists a class of languages that cannot be identified under this new model, but that can be iteratively identified using a Friedberg numbering as the hypothesis space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angluin, D.: Finding patterns common to a set of strings. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 21(1), 46–62 (1980)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Blum, L., Blum, M.: Toward a mathematical theory of inductive inference. Inform. Control 28(2), 125–155 (1975)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Becerra-Bonache, L., Case, J., Jain, S., Stephan, F.: Iterative learning of simple external contextual languages. Theor. Comput. Sci. 411(29-30), 2741–2756 (2010)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Beick, H.-R.: Induktive Inferenz mit höchster Konvergenzgeschwindigkeit. PhD thesis, Sektion Mathematik, Humboldt-Universität Berlin (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Case, J.: Periodicity in generations of automata. Math. Syst. Theory 8(1), 15–32 (1974)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Case, J.: Infinitary self-reference in learning theory. J. Exp. Theor. Artif. In. 6(1), 3–16 (1994)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Carlucci, L., Case, J., Jain, S., Stephan, F.: Results on memory-limited U-shaped learning. Inform. Comput. 205(10), 1551–1573 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Case, J., Kötzing, T.: Strongly non-U-shaped learning results by general techniques. In: Proc. of COLT 2010, pp. 181–193 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Case, J., Moelius, S.: Optimal language learning. In: Freund, Y., Györfi, L., Turán, G., Zeugmann, T. (eds.) ALT 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5254, pp. 419–433. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. de Brecht, M., Yamamoto, A.: Topological properties of concept spaces (full version). Inform. Comput. 208(4), 327–340 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Freivalds, R., Kinber, E., Wiehagen, R.: Inductive inference and computable one-one numberings. Z. Math. Logik 28(27), 463–479 (1982)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Friedberg, R.: Three theorems on recursive enumeration. I. Decomposition. II. Maximal set. III. Enumeration without duplication. J. Symbolic Logic 23(3), 309–316 (1958)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Fulk, M.: Prudence and other conditions on formal language learning. Inform. Comput. 85(1), 1–11 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Mark Gold, E.: Language identification in the limit. Inform. Control 10(5), 447–474 (1967)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Jain, S.: Private communcation (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jain, S., Lange, S., Moelius, S., Zilles, S.: Incremental learning with temporary memory. Theor. Comput. Sci. 411(29-30), 2757–2772 (2010)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Jain, S., Stephan, F.: Learning in Friedberg numberings. Inform. Comput. 206(6), 776–790 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Kummer, M.: An easy priority-free proof of a theorem of Friedberg. Theor. Comput. Sci. 74(2), 249–251 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Lange, S., Wiehagen, R.: Polynomial time inference of arbitrary pattern languages. New Generat. Comput. 8(4), 361–370 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Lange, S., Zeugmann, T.: Incremental learning from positive data. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 53(1), 88–103 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Lange, S., Zeugmann, T., Zilles, S.: Learning indexed families of recursive languages from positive data: A survey. Theor. Comput. Sci. 397(1-3), 194–232 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Moelius, S., Zilles, S.: Learning without coding (2010),(unpublished manuscript), http://www2.cs.uregina.ca/~zilles/moeliusZ10TR.pdf

  23. Rogers, H.: Theory of Recursive Functions and Effective Computability. McGraw Hill, New York (1967); Reprinted, MIT Press (1987)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Shimozono, S., Shinohara, A., Shinohara, T., Miyano, S., Kuhara, S., Arikawa, S.: Knowledge acquisition from amino acid sequences by machine learning system BONSAI. Trans. Inform. Process. Soc. Jpn. 35(10), 2009–2018 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wiehagen, R.: Limes-Erkennung rekursiver Funktionen durch spezielle Strategien. J. Inform. Process. Cybern. (EIK) 12(1/2), 93–99 (1976)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Wiehagen, R.: A thesis in inductive inference. In: Dix, J., Schmitt, P.H., Jantke, K.P. (eds.) NIL 1990. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 543, pp. 184–207. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Moelius, S.E., Zilles, S. (2010). Learning without Coding. In: Hutter, M., Stephan, F., Vovk, V., Zeugmann, T. (eds) Algorithmic Learning Theory. ALT 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6331. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16108-7_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16108-7_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16107-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16108-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics