Skip to main content

Recursive Teaching Dimension, Learning Complexity, and Maximum Classes

  • Conference paper
Algorithmic Learning Theory (ALT 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6331))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper is concerned with the combinatorial structure of concept classes that can be learned from a small number of examples. We show that the recently introduced notion of recursive teaching dimension (RTD, reflecting the complexity of teaching a concept class) is a relevant parameter in this context. Comparing the RTD to self-directed learning, we establish new lower bounds on the query complexity for a variety of query learning models and thus connect teaching to query learning.

For many general cases, the RTD is upper-bounded by the VC-dimension, e.g., classes of VC-dimension 1, (nested differences of) intersection-closed classes, “standard” boolean function classes, and finite maximum classes. The RTD thus is the first model to connect teaching to the VC-dimension.

The combinatorial structure defined by the RTD has a remarkable resemblance to the structure exploited by sample compression schemes and hence connects teaching to sample compression. Sequences of teaching sets defining the RTD coincide with unlabeled compression schemes both (i) resulting from Rubinstein and Rubinstein’s corner-peeling and (ii) resulting from Kuzmin and Warmuth’s Tail Matching algorithm.

This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant SI 498/8-1 and by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angluin, D.: Queries and concept learning. Mach. Learn. 2, 319–342 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balbach, F.: Measuring teachability using variants of the teaching dimension. Theoret. Comput. Sci. 397, 94–113 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Ben-David, S., Eiron, N.: Self-directed learning and its relation to the VC-dimension and to teacher-directed learning. Mach. Learn. 33, 87–104 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Ben-David, S., Litman, A.: Combinatorial variability of Vapnik-Chervonenkis classes with applications to sample compression schemes. Discrete Appl. Math. 86(1), 3–25 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Floyd, S., Warmuth, M.: Sample compression, learnability, and the vapnik-chervonenkis dimension. Mach. Learn. 21(3), 269–304 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goldman, S., Kearns, M.: On the complexity of teaching. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 50(1), 20–31 (1995)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldman, S., Rivest, R., Schapire, R.: Learning binary relations and total orders. SIAM J. Comput. 22(5), 1006–1034 (1993)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldman, S., Sloan, R.: The power of self-directed learning. Mach. Learn. 14(1), 271–294 (1994)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Helmbold, D., Sloan, R., Warmuth, M.: Learning nested differences of intersection-closed concept classes. Mach. Learn. 5, 165–196 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jackson, J., Tomkins, A.: A computational model of teaching. In: 5th Annl. Workshop on Computational Learning Theory, pp. 319–326 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kuhlmann, C.: On teaching and learning intersection-closed concept classes. In: Fischer, P., Simon, H.U. (eds.) EuroCOLT 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1572, pp. 168–182. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuzmin, D., Warmuth, M.: Unlabeled compression schemes for maximum classes. J. Mach. Learn. Research 8, 2047–2081 (2007)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Littlestone, N.: Learning quickly when irrelevant attributes abound: A new linear-threshold algorithm. Mach. Learn. 2(4), 285–318 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Littlestone, N., Warmuth, M.: Relating data compression and learnability. Technical report, UC Santa Cruz (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Maass, W., Turán, G.: Lower bound methods and separation results for on-line learning models. Mach. Learn. 9, 107–145 (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Natarajan, B.: On learning boolean functions. In: 19th Annl. Symp. Theory of Computing, pp. 296–304 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rubinstein, B., Rubinstein, J.: A geometric approach to sample compression (2009) (unpublished manuscript)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sauer, N.: On the density of families of sets. J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A 13(1), 145–147 (1972)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Shinohara, A., Miyano, S.: Teachability in computational learning. New Generat. Comput. 8, 337–348 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Vapnik, V., Chervonenkis, A.: On the uniform convergence of relative frequencies of events to their probabilities. Theor. Probability and Appl. 16, 264–280 (1971)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Welzl, E.: Complete range spaces (1987) (unpublished notes)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zilles, S., Lange, S., Holte, R., Zinkevich, M.: Teaching dimensions based on cooperative learning. In: 21st Annl. Conf. Learning Theory, pp. 135–146 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Doliwa, T., Simon, H.U., Zilles, S. (2010). Recursive Teaching Dimension, Learning Complexity, and Maximum Classes. In: Hutter, M., Stephan, F., Vovk, V., Zeugmann, T. (eds) Algorithmic Learning Theory. ALT 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6331. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16108-7_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16108-7_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16107-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16108-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics