Skip to main content

Modeling and Formally Checking Workflow Properties Using UML and OCL

  • Conference paper
Book cover Perspectives in Business Informatics Research (BIR 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 64))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, a new metamodel for workflows is described by using UML. The underlying UML class diagram is formally extended with OCL pre- and postconditions for operations and OCL invariants for system states. The metamodel allows the developer to specify processes, activities in processes and temporal relations between them. Known workflow patterns are formally captured in the metamodel and sophisticated temporal relations between activities can be expressed easily. Development of workflow models is explained as well as process instantiation and process execution on the basis of a tool realizing parts of the UML action semantics. Prototypical process execution and animation allows the designer to discover properties of the designed processes and activities in early phases of the development without the need for building a full implementation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brambilla, M., Cabot, J., Comai, S.: Automatic Generation of Workflow-Extended Domain Models. In: Engels, G., Opdyke, B., Schmidt, D.C., Weil, F. (eds.) MODELS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4735, pp. 375–389. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Brüning, J., Forbrig, P.: Modellierung von Entscheidungen und Interpretation von Entscheidungsoperatoren in einem WfMS. In: EPK-2009 Geschäftsprozessmanagement mit Ereignisgesteuerten Prozessketten, Berlin, CEUR-WS 554 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brüning, J., Wolff, A.: Declarative Models for Business Processes and UI Generation using OCL. In: The Pragmatics of OCL and Other Textual Specification Languages 2009, Denver, ECEASST, vol. 24 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Decker, G., Overdick, H., Weske, M.: Oryx - An Open Modeling Platform for the BPM Community. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 382–385. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.: UML Activity Diagrams as a Workflow Specification Language. In: International Conference on the Unified Modeling Language (UML), Toronto (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Engels, G., Soltenborn, C., Wehrheim, H.: Analysis of UML Activities Using Dynamic Meta Modeling. In: Bonsangue, M.M., Johnsen, E.B. (eds.) FMOODS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4468, pp. 76–90. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Förster, A., Engels, G., Schattkowsky, van der Straeten, R.: Verification of Business Process Quality Constraints Based on Visual Process Patterns. In: TASE’07, Shanghai (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gogolla, M., Büttner, F., Richters, M.: USE: A UML-Based Specification Environment for Validating UML and OCL. Science of Computer Programming 69, 27–34 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hollingsworth, D.: The Workflow Reference Model, WFMC-TC-1003 (1995), http://www.wfmc.org

  10. Kühne, S., Kern, H., Gruhn, V., Laue, R.: Business Process Modelling with Continuous Validation. In: Ardagna, D., et al. (eds.) BPM 2008 Workshops. LNBIP 17, pp. 212–223. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. OMG Unified Modelling Language (UML) Superstructure Specification Version 2.2 (2009), http://www.omg.org/spec/UML/2.2/Superstructure/PDF/

  12. OMG Object Constraint Language (OCL) Specification Version 2.2 (2010), http://www.omg.org/spec/OCL/2.2/PDF

  13. OMG Workflow Management Facility Version 1.2 (2000), http://www.omg.org/spec/WfMF/1.2/

  14. OMG Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) Specification Version 2.0, Beta 1 (2009), http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?dtc/09-08-14

  15. Rosemann, M., zur Muehlen, M.: Evaluation of Workflow Management Systems - a Meta Model Approach. Australian Journal of Information Systems 6(1), 103–116 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Scheer, A.-W.: Business Process Modeling. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schonenberg, M., Mans, R., Russell, N., Mulyar, N., van der Aalst, W.: Towards a taxonomy of process flexibility (extended version). BPM Center Report BPM-07-11, BPMcenter.org (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. ter Hofstede, A., van der Aalst, W.: YAWL: Yet Another Workflow Language. Information Systems 30(4), 245–275 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. van der Aalst, W., ter Hofstede, A., Kiepuszewski, B., Barros, A.: Workflow Patterns. Distributed and Parallel Databases 14(3), 5–51 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. van der Aalst, W., Pesic, M., Schonenberg, H.: Declarative Workflows Balancing Between Flexibility and Support. Computer Science - Research and Development 23(2), 99–113 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Weske, M.: Workflow Management Systems: Formal Foundation, Conceptual Design, Implementation Aspects, Postdoctoral Dissertation at University of Münster (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Brüning, J., Gogolla, M., Forbrig, P. (2010). Modeling and Formally Checking Workflow Properties Using UML and OCL. In: Forbrig, P., Günther, H. (eds) Perspectives in Business Informatics Research. BIR 2010. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 64. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16101-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16101-8_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16100-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16101-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics