Advertisement

Professional Service Firms as High Performance Work Systems

  • Stephan Kaiser
  • Max Josef Ringlstetter
Chapter

Abstract

The previous chapter focused on individual human resources management instruments in professional service firms. The next chapter now takes things one step further and discusses possible advantages of a systematic combination of individual HR measures in the sense of an integrative approach in comparison to a random application of individually designed personnel measures. This view is based on the finding that the coordination of individual HR measures in the sense of a consistent concentration increases the success of personnel management.1 The so-called high performance work system approach takes this insight into account by emphasizing the systematic concentration of personnel measures with the purpose to enhance entrepreneurial performance.

Keywords

Intrinsic Motivation Human Resource Management Organizational Commitment Extrinsic Motivation Sustainable Competitive Advantage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Allen NJ, Meyer JP (1990) The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. J Occup Psychol 63:1–18Google Scholar
  2. Arthur JB (1994) Effects of human resource system on manufacturing performance and turnover. Acad Manage J 37:670–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bailey TH (2004) High Performance Arbeitssysteme and ihre Auswirkungen auf die Organisationsleistung and die Beschäftigten. In: Gruber H, Harteis C, Heid H, Meier B (eds) Kapital and Kompetenz. WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker BE, Huselid MA (1998) High performance work systems and firm perfromance. Res Pers Hum Resour Manage 16:53–101Google Scholar
  5. Becker BE, Huselid MA, Pickus PS, Spratt MF (1997) HR as a source of shareholder value. Hum Resour Manage 36:39–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benkhoff B (1997) Disentangling organizational commitment. Pers Rev 26:114–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boselie S, Paauwe J, Richardson R (2003) Human resource management, institutionalization and organizational performance. Int J Hum Resour Manage 14(8):1407–1429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boxall P (2003) HR strategy and competitive advantage in the service sector. Hum Resour Manage J 13(3):5–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chaston I (1998) Self-Managed teams. Br J Manage 9(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cook J, Wall T (1980) New work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment, and personal need non-fulfilment. J Occup Psychol 53:39–52Google Scholar
  11. Deci EL, Ryan RM (2000) The “What” and “Why” of goal pursuits. Psychol Inq 11:227–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ditillo A (2004) Dealing with uncertainty in knowledge-intensive firms. Account Organ Soc 29:401–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gmür M (2003) Die Ressource Personal and ihr Beitrag zum Unternehmenserfolg. In: Martin A (ed) Personal als Ressource. Munich, pp 21–52Google Scholar
  14. Guest DE (1997) Human resource management and performance. Int J Hum Resour Manage 8(3):263–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hartog Den DN, Verburg RM (2004) High performance work systems, organisational culture and firm effectiveness. Hum Resour Manage J 14(1):55–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hitt MA, Biermant L, Shimizu K, Kochhar R (2001) Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms. Acad Manage J 44:13–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huselid MA (1995) The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Acad Manage J 38:635–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ichniowski C, Shaw K, Prennushi G (1997) The effects of human resource management practices on productivity. Am Econ Rev 87:291–314Google Scholar
  19. Kerr G, Way SA, Thacker J (2007) Performance, HR practices and the HR manager in small entrepreneurial firms. J Small Bus Entrepren 20(1):55–68Google Scholar
  20. Kor YY, Leblebici H (2005) How do interdependencies among human-capital deployment, development, and diversification strategies affect firms' financial performance? Strat Manage J 26:967–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. MacDuffie JP (1995) Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance. Ind Relat Labor Rev 48:197–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Paauwe J, Boselie P (2005) HRM and performance. Hum Resour Manage J 15(4):68–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sherer PD (1995) Leveraging human assets in law firms: human capital structures and organizational capabilities. Ind Labor Relat Rev 48(4):671–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wallace JE (1995) Organizational and professional commitment in professional and nonprofessional organizations. Adm Sci Q 40:228–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Way SA (2002) High performance work systems and intermediate indicators of firm performance within the US small business sector. J Manage 28:765–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Whitefield K, Poole M (1997) Organizing employment for high performance: theories, evidence and policy. Organ Stud 18:745–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wright PM, Dunford BB, Snell SA (2001) Human resources and the resource based view of the firm. J Manage 27:701–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Appelbaum E, Bailey T, Berg P, Kalleberg AL (2000) Manufacturing competitive advantage. Ithaca, NYGoogle Scholar
  29. Baschab J, Piot J (2005) The professional services firm bible. Hoboken, NJGoogle Scholar
  30. Deci EL, Ryan RM (1985) Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  31. Fitzgerald L, Johnston R, Brignall S, Silvestro R, Voss C (1994) performance measurement in service businesses. LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Frey BS (1997) Markt and motivation. MunichGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universität der Bundeswehr München, Wirtschafts- und OrganisationswissenschaftenNeubibergGermany
  2. 2.Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche FakultätKatholische Universität Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Lehrstuhl für ABWL, Organisation und PersonalIngolstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations