Biologically-aware Latent Dirichlet Allocation (BaLDA) for the Classification of Expression Microarray

  • Alessandro Perina
  • Pietro Lovato
  • Vittorio Murino
  • Manuele Bicego
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6282)

Abstract

Topic models have recently shown to be really useful tools for the analysis of microarray experiments. In particular they have been successfully applied to gene clustering and, very recently, also to samples classification. In this latter case, nevertheless, the basic assumption of functional independence between genes is limiting, since many other a priori information about genes’ interactions may be available (co-regulation, spatial proximity or other a priori knowledge). In this paper a novel topic model is proposed, which enriches and extends the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) model by integrating such dependencies, encoded in a categorization of genes. The proposed topic model is used to derive a highly informative and discriminant representation for microarray experiments. Its usefulness, in comparison with standard topic models, has been demonstrated in two different classification tests.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bicego, M., Lovato, P., Ferrarini, A., Delledonne, M.: Biclustering of expression microarray data with topic models. In: Proc. Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bicego, M., Lovato, P., Oliboni, B., Perina, A.: Expression microarray classification using topic models. In: ACM SAC - Bioinformatics and Computational Biology track (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blei, D., Ng, A., Jordan, M.: Latent dirichlet allocation. J. of Machine Learning Research 3, 993–1022 (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bosch, A., Zisserman, A., Munoz, X.: Scene classification via PLSA. In: Leonardis, A., Bischof, H., Pinz, A. (eds.) ECCV 2006. LNCS, vol. 3954, pp. 517–530. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brändle, N., Bischof, H., Lapp, H.: Robust DNA microarray image analysis. Machine Vision and Applications 15, 11–28 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Castellani, U., Perina, A., Murino, V., Bellani, M., Brambilla, P.: Brain morphometry by probabilistic latent semantic analysis. In: MICCAI (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chang, J., Boyd-Graber, J., Gerrish, S., Wang, C., Blei, D.: Reading the tea leaves: how humans interpret topic models. In: NIPS (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Diaz-Uriarte, R., Alvarez de Andres, S.: Gene selection and classification of microarray data using random forest. BMC Bioinformatics 7(1), 3 (2006)CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frey, B., Dueck, D.: Clustering by passing messages between data points. Science 315, 972–976 (2007)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hofmann, T.: Unsupervised learning by probabilistic latent semantic analysis. Mach. Learn. 42(1-2), 177–196 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jaakkola, T., Haussler, D.: Exploiting generative models in discriminative classifiers. In: NIPS, pp. 487–493 (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jordan, M., Ghahramani, Z., Jaakkola, T., Saul, L.: An introduction to variational methods for graphical models. Machine Learning 37(2), 183–233 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lee, J., Lee, J., Park, M., Song, S.: An extensive comparison of recent classification tools applied to microarray data. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 48(4), 869–885 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Martins, A., Smith, N., Xing, E., Aguiar, P., Figueiredo, M.: Nonextensive information theoretic kernels on measures. J. of Machine Learning Research 10, 935–975 (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Masada, T., Hamada, T., Shibata, Y., Oguri, K.: Bayesian multi-topic microarray analysis with hyperparameter reestimation. In: Proc. Int. Conf. on Advanced Data Mining and Applications (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    McLachlan, G., Bean, R., Peel, D.: A mixture model-based approach to the clustering of microarray expression data. BMC Bioinformatics 18(3), 413–422 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Osareh, A., Shadgar, B.: Classification and diagnostic prediction of cancers using gene microarray data analysis. J. of Applied Sciences 9(3) (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pomeroy, S., Tamayo, P., et al.: Prediction of central nervous system embryonal tumour outcome based on gene expression. Nature 415(6870), 436–442 (2002)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rogers, S., Girolami, M., Campbell, C., Breitling, R.: The latent process decomposition of cdna microarray data sets. IEEE/ACM Trans. on Comp. Biology and Bioinformatics 2(2), 143–156 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dhanasekaran, S., Barrette, T., et al.: Delineation of prognostic biomarkers in prostate cancer. Nature 23 412(6849), 822–826 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Statnikov, A., Aliferis, C., Tsamardinos, I., Hardin, D., Levy, S.: A comprehensive evaluation of multicategory classification methods for microarray gene expression cancer diagnosis. Bioinformatics 21(5), 631–643 (2005)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Valafar, F.: Pattern recognition techniques in microarray data analysis: A survey. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 980, 41–64 (2002)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ying, Y., Li, P., Campbell, C.: A marginalized variational bayesian approach to the analysis of array data. BMC Proceedings 2(suppl. 4), S7 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alessandro Perina
    • 1
  • Pietro Lovato
    • 1
  • Vittorio Murino
    • 1
    • 2
  • Manuele Bicego
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of VeronaVeronaItaly
  2. 2.Italian Institute of Technology (IIT)GenovaItaly

Personalised recommendations