Image Segmentation with a Statistical Appearance Model and a Generic Mumford-Shah Inspired Outside Model

  • Thomas Albrecht
  • Thomas Vetter
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 6376)


We present a novel statistical-model-based segmentation algorithm that addresses a recurrent problem in appearance model fitting and model-based segmentation: the “shrinking problem”. When statistical appearance models are fitted to an image in order to segment an object, they have the tendency not to cover the full object, leaving a gap between the real and the detected boundary. This is due to the fact that the cost function for fitting the model is evaluated only on the inside of the object and the gap at the boundary is not detected. The state-of-the-art approach to overcome this shrinking problem is to detect the object edges in the image and force the model to adhere to these edges. Here, we introduce a region-based approach motivated by the Mumford-Shah functional that does not require the detection of edges. In addition to the appearance model, we define a generic model estimated from the input image for the outside of the appearance model. Shrinking is prevented because a misaligned boundary would create a large discrepancy between the image and the inside/outside model. The method is independent of the dimensionality of the image. We apply it to 3-dimensional CT images.


Image Segmentation Input Image Appearance Model Active Appearance Model Statistical Shape Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Cootes, T., Taylor, C.: Statistical models of appearance for medical image analysis and computer vision. In: Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging, vol. 4322, pp. 236–248 (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Romdhani, S., Vetter, T.: Estimating 3d shape and texture using pixel intensity, edges, specular highlights, texture constraints and a prior. In: IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2005, vol. 2 (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mumford, D., Shah, J.: Optimal Approximations by Piecewise Smooth Functions and Associated Variational Problems. Center for Intelligent Control Systems (1988)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cremers, D., Rousson, M., Deriche, R.: A Review of Statistical Approaches to Level Set Segmentation: Integrating Color, Texture, Motion and Shape. International Journal of Computer Vision 72(2), 195–215 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chan, T.F., Vese, L.A.: Active contours without edges. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 10(2), 266–277 (2001)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heimann, T., Meinzer, H.: Statistical shape models for 3D medical image segmentation: A review. Medical Image Analysis (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blanz, V., Vetter, T.: A morphable model for the synthesis of 3d faces. In: SIGGRAPH 1999: Proceedings of the 26th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, pp. 187–194. ACM Press, New York (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dedner, A., Lüthi, M., Albrecht, T., Vetter, T.: Curvature guided level set registration using adaptive finite elements. In: Pattern Recognition, pp. 527–536 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhu, C., Byrd, R., Lu, P., Nocedal, J.: L-BFGS-B: Fortran subroutines for large-scale bound constrained optimization. ACM Transactions on Mathetmatical Software 23(4), 550–560 (1997)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Albrecht
    • 1
  • Thomas Vetter
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Basel 

Personalised recommendations